Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Oldyoungin, Nov 28, 2023.
If you say so
But when Trump asks for a public trial, Righties say its because dems are trying to bide something.
Why is this different?
Nonsense. Republicans have been smearing and publicly defaming Hunter, including many on the right defaming him on this forum, for almost a year now, and they''ve published all the 1/6 tapes, but no, they won't allow Hunter to defend himself in a public hearing.
They need to have the Hunter gravy train going until Nov. 24 and beyond. That's their best guarantee for votes from the Fox-watching part of the country.
AGREE? He will be made to testify as the committee sees fit...Hunter will not be setting the rules, Comer is..
and as Comer said on TV... THIS IS ABOUT JOE BIDEN'S INVOLVEMENT...
@Patricio Da Silva
@The Mello Guy
Why are you afraid to have Hunter be questioned? Let's get it over with... if there is no there there, then you will have another feather in your hat to rub in our faces...
Comer does not want a public testimony because of the national security issues Hunter has created with involvement with his daddy the President Joe Biden
So Hunter had several Chinese spies... JiaQi Bao , Gongwen Dong, Patrick Ho? Will he be asked about them and Joe's involvement with them?
Why is Comer (and you apparently) afraid to have Hunter questioned in public.
Let's get it over with...
The problem with questioning him in private is that the liars will still claim there is a there there even as there is no there there..
Even Raskin can't counterleak the truth fast enough to keep up with the liars...
If what they were doing was "completely legal", I wouldn't be commenting.
I suppose anyone can have any opinion they want. An open door hearing must protect sources and means. Or are you suggesting that we simply allow those to be exposed in public?
Two different things entirely. A public trial that brings in sources and means in the trial wouldn't be public. No one would bat an eye. There are several specific reasons for an open hearing, namely lots of time limits, etc. A public hearing could be a platform for lots of "I don't recall" moments. We lived through the Hilldebeast's testimony. Why do you suppose that folks might not want that recurrence?
Then by all mean bring a case counselor...... LMAO... Suggesting that somehow reporting the allegations is "smearing and defaming"... Can we quote that in the case of like most all of your posting here?
This is an interesting thread. With the exception of one or two posters, the only ones participating in this Hunter Biden thread are mostly left leaners. I guess it doesn't fit the appropriate narrative.
The absolute LAST thing any MAGA's should want is testimony (public or private) from Hunter Biden...
Talk about conspiracy theory buzzkill...
So you have already deco, without hearing what he has to say, that there was illegal activity?
There is evidence that has been publicly presented that demonstrates illegality. The real question is why the Biden DOJ hasn't already taken steps to address it.
I think Comer needs to explain why he won't accept a public testimony
That “evidence” is consistent with perfectly legal activities.
Amazing, isn't it?
Or, is there a possibility that there is no "proof" of illegal activity exists?
Remember that a prosecutor should have irrefutable evidence of a crime before charging occurs. I think you are looking through partisan colored glasses.
State secrets need to be protected regardless of whether it is an open hearing or not. Also, protecting state secrets does not mean you cannot have an open hearing, providing evidence of the misuse of classified material does not mean you need to disclose the information of said classified material.. if it did, then the Committee itself would not even be able handle a case involving classified information, since not all members of the Oversight Committee are granted a security clearance.
The House Oversight Committee literally had multiple open hearings regarding Hillary Clinton's email investigation, because again, using evidence of classified material doesn't require disclosing the specifics of what that classified information is. Hell, even in a criminal trial, not even the jurors are given the specifics of the classified material. The Classified Information Procedures Act was passed for this very purpose, it is to allow for a fair legal procedure while also protecting state secrets.
If the House Oversight Committee had evidence that Hunter had access to classified material, that in itself would be very telling considering he is not an individual with a security clearance of any capacity.
This is about Joe Biden's involvement.... What did Joe know and when did he know it.... Where is the DOJ investigation into this?
There will be no public questioning due to National Security issues and Joe's Biden involvement..
National security nightmare of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop containing phone numbers for the Clintons, Secret Service officers and most of the Obama cabinet plus his sex and drug addictions - all secured by the password Hunter02.. this came from the office of the VP
Please notice it was sent to Hunter and Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov (which is Joe's pseudonyms on e-mails) from the office of the vice president while he was still in office.
Don't worry. The Democrats in Congress will come out to support Hunter. They are lining up their canned questions as we speak.
I have heard that the Whitehouse is not happy about this. Hunter could spill some beans, but I tend to doubt it will happen. It will be in the form of depositions which will be cleaned up for public consumption.
So they would rather hear "I don't recall" behind closed doors?
As Comer explained last night, a closed door hearing comes first and then an open hearing. He said that’s the law.
Separate names with a comma.