I guess they should’ve told Martin Luther King the same thing that he should have stopped making race an issue. They should have told Gloria Steinem that she should stop making gender an issue You remind me of Rodney King who asked, can’t we just get along? Race is not an outdated idea, as we see with the rise of white supremacy. You cannot define black people as inferior human beings for hundreds of years and then suddenly see them as equals
No society is not less racist because we promote and value equality..it is because it is illegal. Trump has unleashed racism like we have never seen in generations. I agree people can choose not to be racist but unfortunately more and more people are choosing to be racist
Horseshit? Are you always this rude? Again you have difficulty addressing my comments. I said nothing about criminality but you do seem to want him fired for expressing an opinion you don't like in an independent publication. Do you believe people should be judged by their humanity rather than skin color (and all that implies) or not? Do you believe painting a philosophy with a broad brush, per my example, is dishonest or not?
Hm, what does ''it's time to let these clowns support themselves'' actually mean? Does it mean they are out of their last job? What does it mean to you? I'm sorry, you don't answer direct questions do you, but you do have no trouble mischaracterizing what I wrote.
Why should tax payers fund this racist crap from this extremist professor? These crooks get students to take on debt, supposedly in exchange for greater earning ability and then leave them saddled with loans that they cannot make the payments on because they sold them a lie rather than a marketable skill. I say it's time to let students bankrupt, and claw back half of the taxpayers costs from the institution that it was spent at. That will give them some skin in the game and this idiot can focus on providing his students marketable skills rather than this virtue signalling nonsense posing as moralistic self-flagellation.
As I said taxpayers did not pay for ''this racist crap'' but you continue to deflect and change the subject. Another substance free angry right-winger. Pointless.
Racist attitudes have subsided in recent decades since the Civil Rights movement which raised awareness about racial injustice. Systematic Racism is illegal but racist attitudes still exist including in the criminal justice system and many people still have racist attitudes such as separatism and opposing interracial relationships. I agree that racism has been resurgent since Donald Trump became President. He feeds off of the hatred of the far-right and he encourages racism. I believe he is really a racist himself as people who have spoken to him privately have stated but he claims to not be for political purposes.
Much of the separationist movements current in the news is blacks demanding their own private events, graduations, and environments free from white people. White people that advocate this are shunned while blacks that do it are ignored if not applauded. As for the criminal justice system the irregularities are usually found due to profiling (which utilizes unbiased statistical data) as well as rates of recidivism and prior records. Black men need to stop committing almost half of all crime while compromising around 7% of the population to call this data into question.
Really? Do you know who the founder of Planned Parenthood was? Her name was Margaret Sanger. She was a proponent of eugenics. Given her racial ides and the DNC's near-fanatical defense of PP, I'm confident I have established a track record from the 1860's to today. That's 150 years+. Seems to me the only times the DNC is concerned about minorities is when they can make political points from it. Where was the outrage when Obama was putting kids in cages? If the Dems really had a problem with this, the problem could/should have been solved long before DT came into office. Not that I think he shouldn't have fixed it himself. These (and the points before) are not talking points. They show the true position of the Democratic Party. /s/sorry if they don't like it./s/
Through my 66 years I have seen many changes, especially in business, how race is thought of and handled. I was raised in what would be called at the time, a progressive family on race. Since I was raised by a single mother the male/female issues were also present. With that, throughout my career I have treated everyone with only one thing in mind. Can they do the job or not. If they can, at what level. Race or gender never considered but in reverse, that did not always work. In one case a woman I was training disappeared while I was training her. When I asked where she went it turned out to be the bathroom to cry. She was very pretty and used to men bending over backwards to help her. I treated her like I treated everyone.
LOL, Obama built the cages and many of the pictures shown to prove Trump was putting kids in cages were from 2014. Your lack of knowledge is showing.
Some I do and you probably don't know what her views were. She believed that women should only have as many babies as they can afford. Do you disagree? Here's more, some I agree with some I don't: ''Sanger's eugenic policies included an exclusionary immigration policy, free access to birth control methods, and full family planning autonomy for the able-minded, as well as compulsory segregation or sterilization for the "profoundly retarded".[117][118] Sanger wrote, "we [do not] believe that the community could or should send to the lethal chamber the defective progeny resulting from irresponsible and unintelligent breeding."[119] In personal correspondence she expressed her sadness about the aggressive and lethal Nazi eugenics program; and donated to the American Council Against Nazi Propaganda.[118] In addition, Sanger believed the responsibility for birth control should remain with able-minded individual parents rather than the state, and that self-determining motherhood was the only unshakable foundation for racial betterment.'' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger#Eugenics Society has moved forward like it has from the founding father's day. Is that all you have? On the DNC, I gave you concrete examples of the RNC ''conspiracy'' you are a little vague on the DNC's. Can you be more specific?
If I didn't know her views I wouldn't have brought her up. I'm not as stupid as you think I am. I don't disagree. But that still points to a negative eugenics approach, which I do not agree with. When we look at the clients of PP, we see a disproportionate number of minorities. Even if Mrs. Sanger had the best of intentions (doubtful)., the result has been pretty racist. I don't recall that. I recall that I have given you a history of the DNC's actions from the Civil War to the present, showing a historic bias in that party.
True: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-build-cages-immigrants/ But: ''Trump in his Telemundo interview sought to blame Obama for the family separations as well, but the Obama administration did not have a policy around large-scale separation of migrant families. The thousands of children separated from their parents last year were separated entirely due to Trump policies.'' https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-says-obama-built-migrant-children-cages-2019-6
[ These (and the points before) are not talking points. They show the true position of the Democratic Party. /s/sorry if they don't like it./s/[/QUOTE] They are looking at Sanger through 2019 eyes
Those were the kids that came ALONE without any parents in 2014. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_American_immigration_crisis They were NOT SEPARATED from their families by the Obama administration. Those are the UNDENIABLE FACTS!
Actually many were if the parent had a criminal record but then Obama chose not to follow the law, often.
