If You Believe Homosexual Acts Are Immoral, Why Are You Labeled a "homophobe"?

I don't see proof, plus the supreme court struck down many marriage bans including Texas's.

Incorrect.

All of this is built on an incorrect statement so there for it's irrelevant.

 

I see quotation marks around "gay marry". Who are you quoting? Or is that one of your fabricated quotes you use to pretend you have something relevant to contribute?

 

Incorrect.

It has.

 

You, you invented this term.

*yawn

 

"You" have a big problem when "anyone uses" quotation marks when they "aren't actually quoting anything in particular". "Why?"

Furthermore, the fact of the matter is that, even if the definition of marriage in your 1975 version of Merriam-Webster's dictionary has the words "man and woman" in it, that doesn't change the fact that men are going to soon be marrying men and women are soon going to be marrying women country-wide. And your side of the legal debate will lose, because legally, you have no leg left to stand on.

 

You would need to read the quote from the Supreme court, and in the real world the Supreme Court of the US has never struck down any such marriage bans. Im sure they have repeatedly in your delusions.

 

I tried to tell him he was making an appeal to tradition. He didn't believe me.

he doesn't realize guys own fallacy.

 

Because I am under the impression, in the English language, quotation marks are used to indicate a quote.

- - - Updated - - -

Nope. I did tell you that you wouldnt understand.

 

What quote?

Incorrect. They have struck down marriage bans, see fit yourself.
https://www.google.com/search?redir...owser-type&qsubts=1399505807814&action=devloc

*yawn

 

The gay marriage crowd likes to ignore that case in favor of Loving's truncated dicta as it shoots down their argument that marriage is predicated on some unbounded, undefined inalienable right.

 

Yes, I was quoting you. You invented some ridiculous term and I was quoting your meaninglessness.

 

Ah, so then, it is not also used to denote irony at times? Or perhaps a different meaning of a word or a phrase. You sure do seem to have a high opinion of your intelligence, yet you do not acknowledge the fact that there are alternate ways to use punctuation, words, etc.

And no, I don't understand. Of course, if you answered direct questions in more than sentence fragments, I would. But that's your prerogative.

 

What is this "gay marriage"? (dixon, I am quoting smevins). Gay people don't want to "gay marry" their spouses, they want to marry them.

 

A fantasy kind of like Cinderella except with a ring instead of a shoe.

 

No, two heterosexual of the same sex are excluded as well. NOT because they are homosexual, they are not, but instead because they are of the same sex. Their sexual orientation is irrelevant. Homosexual man with a little imagination and a homosexual woman can procreate together just fine.

 

Well in many places it's a reality.

 

No, in all places it is a fantasy perpetrated by adults who think they can play dress up and consider themselves normal when they are no more real than one of the 750 Spocks at a Star Trek convention.

 

This is a dumb argument. Because of you could marry people of the same sex. Two heterosexuals of the same sex. could marry as well. I am arguing to remove the exclusion and thus increase liberty.

All of this really defeats your argument and supports mine. Because if there were no restrictions on the sex of the person you married all of that would be true and you could have more choice.

Completely irrelevant to this discussion. I am talking about law, not biology.

- - - Updated - - -

Opinion noted.

 

Well, you're quite simply wrong. One of these days you might try to join the rest of us in the real world.

 

As one gay man to another gay man, the level of self-loathing that I read in each of your posts has led me to encourage you to seek professional help. I also would like to invite you to my home in El Paso. You can stay with my husband and I, and you can make the determination on whether or not we're "normal". I know I'm normal... my mother had me tested.

 

I think he is a youngsteryoungster based on the following sentence, "No, in all places it is a fantasy perpetrated by adults..."

Perpetrated by adults, that is a curious thing to say. I don't refer to other people as adults.

 

You mean the real world where Rob Riener auditions and hires people to say they want to be married to pay to put them in front of gay judges to get pro-gay rulings?

No, I am not wrong. I have standards.

 

If he is indeed gay.

meh, normal is so subjective it is meaningless. My life with my husband is normal for me.

 

Same here, I just said that so I could throw a "Big Bang Theory" (Ooo! There's ANOTHER USE for quotation marks other than quoting something! Titles!) reference into a post.

 

you are opinionated. Join the club.

- - - Updated - - -

I picked up on that reference. I am a big fan of that show.