IG REPORT: FBI AGENTS REGULARLY RECEIVED FREE HANDOUTS FROM JOURNALISTS

[QUOTE="Covfefe, post: 1069222718, member: 7644]
Sorry that's what happens when you put party before principles.[/QUOTE]
lol, the irony...you should know

 

your conspiracies are ridiculous, this one with the fbi, is as valid as the birth certificate. grow a spine and shed your persecution complex.

 

The FBI completely ignored the smoking gun email exchange with Clinton subordinate Jake Sullivan in June 2011 instructing him to strip classification markings from a document and "send nonsecure." The evidence of bias in the FBI's handling of the investigation is pretty clear.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...p-hillary-clinton-email-fbi-column/704815002/

 

clinton should not have a security clearance. other than that, flame on

 

Justice Dept. email report proves anti-Donald Trump/pro-Hillary Clinton bias

The most shocking statement was from the Peter Strzok/Lisa Page texts. “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page wrote. To which Strzok replied, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.” The IG report noted that this is “not only indicative of a biased state of mind,” but “even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact (Trump’s) electoral prospects.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...p-hillary-clinton-email-fbi-column/704815002/

 

It's amazing that she still has security clearance.

The most shocking statement was from the Peter Strzok/Lisa Page texts. “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page wrote. To which Strzok replied, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.” The IG report noted that this is “not only indicative of a biased state of mind,” but “even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact (Trump’s) electoral prospects.”

This was also around the time that Strzok was starting the sketchy Russia investigation, which will be the subject of a future report. Another interesting wrinkle is that while Page’s question had been released to congressional investigators, Strzok’s answer was specifically omitted and remained unseen until this report. It makes you wonder what other inflammatory evidence has been withheld, and why.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...p-hillary-clinton-email-fbi-column/704815002/

 

that has nothing to do with her security clearance.

 

that is an opinion piece, keep feeding those monsters under your bed.

 

Well I think the FBI and IG know better than you. Perhaps you missed the hearings yesterday.

 

In July 2016, James Comey admitted that Clinton had lied about not having sent or received classified material, about only using one electronic device, and about having turned over all her work-related emails. But nothing was done about it. She ordered hard drives wiped with BleachBit after Congress had issued a subpoena for their contents, but investigators gave her a pass.

Critical evidence against Clinton
And the FBI completely ignored the smoking gun email exchange with Clinton subordinate Jake Sullivan in June 2011 instructing him to strip classification markings from a document and "send nonsecure." In these cases, the evidence of bias in the FBI's handling of the investigation is the absence of action.

The bureau put together a team whose biases were clearly pro-Clinton and virulently anti-Trump. And somehow, the same cast of Trump-hating characters pops up in the Clinton email probe, the Russia investigation and the Mueller matter, undermining the validity of all three investigations.

Finally, although the IG found “no bias or other improper consideration” in the “FBI’s decisions or actions,” the bureau is still going to require a new training that will address exactly that. In the words of the FBI, the training will drill "home the importance of objectivity — and of avoiding even the appearance of personal conflicts or political bias in our work."

Because they want to work swiftly to eliminate this problem that doesn’t exist.

 

as always, you dont what you hear or read, it becomes a conspiracy.