IKEA apologises for child shooting a gun

Can you provide one critique of a paper that you've read? If not, why not?

 

Arthur Kellermann was subject to much critical appraisal and publish in the New England Journal of Medicine, despite his work being factually deficient. Those in charge of such a decision proved that they are more interested in political advocacy than the truth, and demonstrated that the peer review process means nothing.

 

Sorry for the stupid request! You can't.

 

Academia is the one that undermined its own credibility when it sold out to becoming nothing more than a front for political advocacy. It is a stain that cannot be recovered from.

 

Yep, its those clever academics that are at fault, not the ideologue whinging because they don't agree with his grunt.

 

Factually correct.

 

Damn them clever academics and their knowledge!

 

Until you go from the fact that your under 14s are some 17 times more likely to be shot than in the rest of the developed world then where do you go from here ?

 

The above is a direct result of being involved with gang affiliations, and taking part in illegal activities.

 

Improve your posts to me or feck off

 

And free access to guns allows them that facility and obviously thats all good

 

If I am wrong please 'correct' me ?

 

You posted cobblers to me and asked me to put you right? Do one.

 

Bummer and there was me thinking I was always on your side. Hey ho I guess your gun neurosis is far deeper than I can ever imagine

 

If you can't construct an argument, then no. Feckin obviously.

 

Having guns are bad where not having them is good I cannot get more simplistic than that ! The math doesn't lie

 

Given you couldn't be arsed to post a relevant comment to me, forgive my sneer. Kindly feck off.

 

So do I take it you like the way your society is then viz guns ?

fill your boots !

 

Nope, but I don't have any faith in someone that can't communicate with me correctly. Pretend elsewhere.

 

Get back to me when you are less confused. I've lived in your society for more than two years in the past and am well aware of just how f*cked up it is with respect to guns so I'm well experienced to comment

 

Blubbering to me when your original post was in error won't help. Do one.

 

Because engaging in criminal activity plays absolutely no part in someone being killed, correct?

 

Well its a whole lot less likely to be lethal without guns

 

So you like your societies lethal gun fixation ? Sorry that I misread you

 

And since such is not going to transpire in the united states, where firearms ownership is recognized as a constitutional right, the above is nothing more than an idealistic statement with no more credibility than the statement of how if there were no disease then no one would die from illness. It is circular logic that cannot and does not exist in the real world, and is not worth discussing as if it held merit.