Illinois teen arrested in fatal shooting at Kenosha protest, police say

There is no logic.

He just heard the leftist media nonsensical talking point about "across state lines" and he regurgitated it thinking it was some sort of valid argument.

 

it is 21 miles from antioch IL to Kenosha WI .

what reasons could rittehouse have had to be in Kenosha ?? was he a minor at the time of the murders?? where did he get the rifle and amo??

did he own property there?? did he have relatives there ?? did he own the gun used to kill the 2 men?? what and who was he protecting?? who gave him the authority to open carry?? did he had a gun license?? had he been trained in combat??

as i said. ..his parents are piss poor parents.
they should have told him if he wants to kill people then wait until his 18th birthday, then join the military
become a navy seal or a green beret .. they will train him that murder is always the last resort. so when they kill they have just cause

what was kyle rittenhousea “just cause”

were the guys he shot armed?! a real man would have fought with his fists not a gun

this kinda proves below

most gun owners are big pussys. that is why they need a gun because fear controls their life


kinda sad actually

 

You know the dirtbags he shot were all white, right?

 

Literally all of your questions in this post have been answered over the course of this thread, most of them repeatedly. If you'd just go back and read what has been written here, you'll find the answers to your questions and be immensely better-informed before commenting again.

 

You should make an effort to learn the basic facts of this case.

That's actually something you should've done before you decided to chime in with your uninformed two cents like a typical clueless 2A hater.

 

Here's one of the guys he shot.



You think it's a good idea to bring fists to a gunfight?

 

For @gringo's benefit, I'll point out the obvious: the dead pedo tried your "a real man would have fought with his fists not a gun" 'strategy' and he's now dead. Another dirtbag tried to be a half a man and fight with a skateboard, and he's dead too. the two that survived, Kyle and the one-armed wonder, were both armed with guns. It seems quite obvious what the winning tactic is here.

 

I asked you a question on whats your logic of losing your right to self defense if you cross state lines.
All you did was ask a bunch of questions that have already been answered before. and non of them address why you think crossing a state line means you cant defend yourself.

Want to take another try at backing up your position on why a state line should strip you of your rights?

 

how lame can the gun nuts become?

yes i know the questions i posed already had replies.
but
there is a difference between a reply and an answer

my guess is rotten house will be tried as a child because at the time of the murder he was a juvenile

again. rottenhouse had no business being in the cheese state other than to be a vigilante

i do believe a person has a right to defend him/her self ..but a person does not have a right to get involved in matters that is none of his business

as i said. if the people rotten house killed had went to illinois and began attacking him
or his property or family then fire away

but a person can not go looking for a fight then claim self defense

kinda like a boxer getting in a ring and gets an ass whooping, then stabs the opponent because he lost the fight

 

You're not going to bother to learn the basic facts of this case, are you?

 

Why does Rittenhouse not have a right to go WI? And again why would crossing state lines strip someone of there right to self defense?

And using a fire extinguisher to put out an arsons fire is starting a fight how exactly?

You have shown several times you have no clue what happened there so maybe actually read up on the events that happened first.

But regardless still looking for the logic of the state line stripping your rights away.. You want to try and tackle that one again?

 

rittenhouse certainly had the right of self defense ..

but as stated...if rittenhouse had stayed home like 99.9% of every other normal 17 year old kids while there was a riot going on

then rittenhouse may be enrolled in college at this time

rittenhouse was looking for trouble going to kenosha..

why else would he have a gun??

a gun is only a peacemaker in theory..in reality a gun is a weapon used to kill

 

BOOM!

Correct. You got that fact about the case right.

High five!

That's all irrelevant, because this-

 

So your blaming Rittenhouse for not staying home, but giving the rioters a pass for being there burning down buildings and attacking him? So do you also blame a woman that is cutting down a dark ally after a night out at a club that gets raped? I mean if she was home she wouldnt of gotten raped right? I think thats called victim blaming..

 

I am giving NO ONE a pass..

the rioters should be held responsible for burning down buildings and attacking rittenhouse and others while rioting

should their punishment be decided by a 17 year old kid with a rifle??

this is why the US government has the national guard and Wisconsin has state police departments and Kenosha county has a sheriffs department

their job is to keep the peace and to serve and protect the citizens

they should have taken away rittenhouses gun and sent him home to his momma

not since WW 1 has a 17 year old kid been asked to defend this country


obviously the above law enforcement administrations were doing a piss poor job

they allowed ritenhouse to roam the streets with a loaded weapon

rittenhouse should have been arrested the same as the rioters and looters

 

Yes, that's how it works when you physically attack a 17year old kid with a rifle
You are literally putting your life into his hands..

If the pedophile decided to stay home he would still be alive today, or if the pedophile decided to not to attack a person with a rifle and he would still be alive today.. but radical lefty's will do what lefty's do I guess..

 

wow!!

what post are you referring ??

this is the problem with the believers

the topic was about a 17 year old kid roaming the streets with a high powered load rifle and committing murder

now the topic turns to pedophilia??

 

again maybe you should actually read up on an event before commenting on them, The Pedophile is Rosenbaum the first person who attacked Rittenhouse and got shot. He raped several kids aged 9-11 years old.

Again all you have done here is shown how ignorant you are on the events that happened, why dont you read up on what happened.. this thread has all the info

 

The rioters had been given a pass by the police which is why the people felt the need to organize and help protect themselves.

If people can drive a long distance to burn buildings loot and assault people then I'm ok with people driving 15 minutes to protect people and property.

Your logic doesn't make any sense. And is devoid of reality.

 

He wasn't roaming the streets he got approached and assaulted by the pedophile.

 

You seriously need to research the basic facts of this case.

It amazes me how much effort some people put into arguing things they clearly know nothing about.

High emotion, low comprehension. Typical gun hater.

 

My father was sitting in a ball turret operating twin fifties at that age. Through out History warriors have been young

 

It was an AR-15. I don't think you would consider that a high powered rifle.

 

Yip.. a varmit round.. and the Army liked it because it didn't kill outright, but rather wounded ,, thereby taking three enemy off the field, the one wounded and two to carry him to medical treatment.

 

To defend himself from the mob, which he did admirably. The gun was a fantastic tool in making that possible.