That poster NEVER said saving lives was egotistical.....see how you twist things because truth is hard to face...and you have no facts...
My answer is clear and concise. Human life begins at conception. Abortion is the willful termination of a human life. It is a good thing to save human lives.
FoxHastings said: ↑ That poster NEVER said saving lives was egotistical.....see how you twist things because truth is hard to face...and you have no facts... I've come to realize that your repeated "That's funny" reply is another way of putting, "I'm stumped again, caught with no proof"... OR you think it's funny for you to be wrong all the time.....
When has there been a real filibuster? Mr Smith goes to Washington? Since the 1970s, the Senate has also used a "two-track" procedure whereby Senate business may continue on other topics while one item is filibustered. Since filibusters no longer required the minority to actually hold the floor and bring all other business to a halt, the mere threat of a filibuster has gradually become normalized. In the modern Senate, this means that any controversial item now typically requires 60 votes to advance, unless a specific exception limiting the time for debate applies
You just made my point. 60 votes are required in the Senate. Now tell us what cloture is (it’s in your post) and what the Reid rule is.
No one has ever aborted a child. There are thousands of unwanted children that will never see the inside of a loving home, have their scraped knee fixed with a kiss, or know what it is like to be cherished. Why do you turn your back on them simply because they are breathing?
You are free to ask any of them if they would prefer to have been aborted because their life sucks. How many do you think will say yes? Oh, that's right, you want to make that choice for them don't you? You are going to tell them what's best for them. How pathetic. If their life sucks so bad they are more than welcome to go stand on the train tracks at night but at least they have that choice which is ironic since you guys whine about choice all the time but want to take the children's away.
One one hand, we have people writing creative pieces on how precious life is and how much they care about these precious humans. On the other, we have all these precious humans who need someone to care. My question is why you turn your back on these children after making such a strong claim to care? How many have you adopted?
AGAIN, there are no children involved in abortion, a fetus is aborted...not a child, not a teenager, not an adult...it is a fetus. A fetus has no way to think or speak so DUH, it's impossible to ask their opinion. YES, the pregnant woman decides what is best for her and her fetus....it's no one else's business. Yes, BORN PEOPLE are free to take their lives, it's their choice. (BTW, a fetus is free to leave the woman it's in and grow on it's own or stand on RR tracks.....do you really think that happens??) Born people are also free to do what they wish with their body concerning pregnancy... YOU have the right to your own body , why do you want to take that right away from pregnant women?
Abortion is preventing a life from forming, whether or not you think it's a child at a certain age or not is irrelevant, the end result is the same. It's the lack of a beautiful child in this world. You can't justify that.
She also has the choice not to have sex and make this never happen. If you do then you need to take responsibility for it. There are no such things as mulligans when it comes to human life.
How many do you foster or have adopted? And are you one of those in support of cutting family aid? Be honest here.
You know full well that I am tecoyah. You have known me for many years and my views have never changed. Quit trying to bait me into some sort of trap of yours.
But NOT irrelevant to the law....and rights. There's plenty...go adopt one... . YES, I can justify women having the right to their own bodies....just like you and everyone else has...
