I was simply pointing out hypocrisy and asking you questions to make you see it. Apparently it did not work.
There is no hypocrisy there, the two events are completely unrelated. You lefties try to connect them but it doesn't work. It's like saying, "yeah you support the lives of unborn children but are you a Red Sox fan", "OMG the hypocrisy".
. Yes, women have that CHOICE..."choice" means there is more than one option. They all don't want to limit themselves to "Jennifer" and kissy face YES, THEY have to take responsibility for it NOT YOU. It is THEIR responsibility to decide to keep it or not.... WTF is a mulligan?
We are actively working to change that law by the way. And it may happen sooner rather than later once a case works it's way up the supreme court.
Who is "we"..... RvW still stands after 50 years... And you can't change a law based on emotional hyperbole( which is all you have)....the Anti-Choicers have NEVER come up with a good argument to destroy women's right to their own bodies. Uh, RvW is still there at 50.
Of course they are. The problem is that you guys tell yourselves we don't care and you say that lie so much you start to believe it. It never came from us. It's a creation of the lefties.
FoxHastings said: ↑ . Yes, women have that CHOICE..."choice" means there is more than one option. They all don't want to limit themselves to "Jennifer" and kissy face YES, THEY have to take responsibility for it NOT YOU. It is THEIR responsibility to decide to keep it or not.... WTF is a mulligan? Yes, and I shouldn't have since you used it as an excuse to avoid addressing my post.
Okay...so you want a woman to carry a child to birth, but don't really care about it afterward...how is that unrelated? You my dear are Pro-Birth vs. Pro-Life.
RvW is a flawed ruling that actually has no basis to stand on. There was no standing to sue in that case and it should be tossed, really never should have been heard in the first place but they did it for political reasons. Basically a bunch of activists invented a case to bring before the court, there was no actual victim in it therefore it's not legit.
NO, it isn't , the right has a history of cutting or attempting to cut entities that aid LIVING BREATHING ON THE GROUND CHILDREN...entities like Welfare, WIC, SNAP, even healthy school lunches and public TV...
Not to harm the children but to prevent parents from abusing the system. If the parents can't take care of a child without it then I fully support removing that child from their custody, improving our foster care system, giving that child free medical and college support and whatever else they need. It's all about the kids dude.
FoxHastings said: ↑ NO, it isn't , the right has a history of cutting or attempting to cut entities that aid LIVING BREATHING ON THE GROUND CHILDREN...entities like Welfare, WIC, SNAP, even healthy school lunches and public TV... DUHHHH, cutting funding HURTS those who need it, CHILDREN, it doesn't stop cheats....but keep making excuses for punishing children for the acts of their parents....ho cruel. And this strange place you're talking about is on what planet??? Righties are dead against free medical and free college support, they call it socialism and act like it's Really Bad. Yup, kids who the righties don't give a ship about AFTER their born....but that's because Republican politicians have used abortion to get votes and once elected they don't care.
Oh when did this mysterious "we" present that crap to the Supreme Court....the date when it was heard?????
I am the furthest right you can get on that scale and I support fully providing everything for abused children. You can even raise my taxes to pay for it, raise the taxes on the rich or cut the military if that is what is required. <Rule 2/5>
I see, so you have adopted kids mixed in with the ones you foster, and support your local orphanage while working the soup kitchen….right?
Actually soup kitchens are old school, I have expanded ours to provide sandwiches which are far more healthy. Sometimes when the stingy democrats actually donate I will prepare hot meals for the children. Either way I always meet the strict guidelines Michelle Obama laid out so our children don't get fat.
