Independant Investigation on WTC Dust

Discussion in '9/11' started by Hannibal, Mar 2, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It helps expose your dishonesty. Look at all available info? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Bull(*)(*)(*)(*)! You IGNORE info based on arbitrary crap you make up. Come back when you actually can tell the truth.
     
  2. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look up thermitic material. Thermitic material is any material that gives off heat. High explosives, like those used in controlled demolition, don't cut with heat. They cut with pressure waves. You should really learn something before pretending you know what you're talking about.

    *YAWN* Don't you have anything new or truthful to say? You've had the crap kicked out of you six ways from Sunday and shown to be a dishonest liar, and all you can come back with is WE'RE dishonest? :lol: LAME!

    Of course I did. And you keep running while pretending nothing has been presented. Think anyone is fooled by your dishonesty?

    For anyone who thinks SS is being honest, watch this.

    Do you deny I linked to you the 9/11 commission report?

    Do you deny the 9/11 commission report contains information linking all 19 hijackers to 9/11?

    Watch him run!
     
  3. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you still cannot prove they were all in al qaeda. Not surprised but please keep up with your false claims as it shows just how much dishonesty you need to defend the OCT.
     
  4. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Once again, just so there is absolutely no doubt as to the dishonesty of your posts:

    Do you deny that I linked the 9/11 commission report to you?

    Do you deny that the 9/11 commission report contains information that links all 19 hijackers to Al Qaeda?

    Run away once again. The more you run, the more people can see you for what you REALLY are.
     
  5. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe that is why I said the term "explosives" refers to any artificial means of bringing down the buildings? It is painfully obvious but your posts are painfully dishonest.

    You ever going to show how they were all in al qaeda or will you keep running from another unsubstantiated claim?
     
  6. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you still can't prove they were all in al qaeda? Give it up and stop making claims you can't support.
     
  7. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thermitic material cannot bring a building down. Why do you think it isn't used in controlled demolitions? It would take so much thermitic material to heat up the steel to the point of collapse that it is ludicrous to even consider it as an option.

    You've been shown the truth. You continue to run from the truth. That is why you STILL can't answer two simple questions any honest person would be able to answer.

    Did I link you the 9/11 commission report?

    Does the 9/11 commission report contain information linking all 19 hijackers to Al Qaeda?

    Why is it you STILL can't answer these questions? I will answer that for you. You can't answer the questions because you know the answer to both questions is yes which exposes your dishonesty for everyone to see. But don't worry. The very fact you run from the questions answers the questions as clearly as though you answered them yourself. It just makes you look even worse for not having the balls to answer them.
     
  8. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you EVER going to prove they were all in al qaeda? Doesn't look like it....
     
  9. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thank you for answering the two simple questions that expose your dishonesty. Even though you don't answer the questions, you know everyone knows what the answer is. So it is clear you don't care about your credibility and you know everyone knows just how dishonest you are. What do you have to gain from continuing the childish charade?
     
  10. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So instead of having the balls to back up your claims you simply blame other people.

    Go study the 9/11 issue and be sure you can back up claims you make because you obviously can't prove all the hijackers were in al qaeda.
     
  11. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've not only backed up my claims, but I blame no one? Why is it you continue to run from the truth?

    Do you deny I linked you the 9/11 commission report?

    Do you deny the 9/11 commission report contains information that links all 19 hijackers to Al Qaeda?

    You can run, but the truth is becoming more blatantly obvious with every denial you make.
     
  12. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You still can't prove they were all in al qaeda.

    Here is the deal. Until you either retract or prove your claim I will ask you to prove it every single time you quote one of my posts.
     
  13. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Serious question for you. Do you honestly think anyone is fooled by your antics?

    Here you go yet again. All the evidence one needs to link the 19 hijackers to Al Qaeda. You've been given it before. You've run away from the truth time and time again. More running only proves you know the truth of 9/11 and are not man enough to admit the truth.
     
  14. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You need to prove they were all in al qaeda.
     
  15. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The link contains all the evidence. The fact you deny all the evidence in order to push your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) agenda is not my problem.
     
  16. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You ever going to prove they were all in al qaeda?
     
  17. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Said the guy who refused to read the report referenced in the OP.
     
  18. kowalskil

    kowalskil New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    398
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The report is too rich in details, as far as "civil discussion" on this forum is concerned.
    .
     
  19. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I didn't read every page of the report but I read enough to know they don't know the origin of the chips and the guy had an agenda instead of attempting an objective study.
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Then you didn't read far enough.

    Comprehension is fundamental. The details (as another poster pointed out) are rich.
     
  21. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jones couldn't prove the origin of the chips either. What Jones did do, however, is give a very detailed checklist of how they identified the red gray chips and how they determined them to be thermitic.

    As for your agenda claim, what is your evidence? By your own admission you haven't read the paper, so how do you know the study is not objective? Do you honestly think a known proven liar labeling a paper he has not read as agenda driven and not objective is a believable claim? Because nobody I know would be stupid enough to believe you based on just your good word that the report is biased. Maybe you should post some evidence of bias to prove your claim or admit you were once again making (*)(*)(*)(*) up and lying your ass off.
     
  22. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You ever going to prove they were all in al qaeda?
     
  23. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Since the origin of the chips are unknown the results are meaningless. Is that really so difficult to understand? Maybe some people are actually dumb enough to fully read a 59 page report where the results prove nothing on any claim.
     
  24. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Already have.

    Way to run from the questions directed at you. Seems to be all you can do, doesn't it. Oh wait. It IS all you're capable of doing. :lol:
     
  25. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You ever going to prove they were in al qaeda?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page