Insufferable fools

Imagine going to work everyday and while you're there sitting at your desk, you have to hear your "intelligent" coworkers talk about rumor and gossip, the adult version of the HS mill. And it makes you want to rip your hair out.

Introducing the White House 'Press Corps'. In 18 minutes, I think only ONE question was thought-provoking. One. The Press Corps is an excellent view into the pathetic, dreadful, sad, miserable and even angering state of our pathetic excuse of a media outlet.

If these people weren't "hired" by these companies, would they be employed at all? That's a serious question. Their IQ's are incredibly low and you really get the sense that they wouldn't be able to work for any other profession.

My favorite is the second to last questioner(among a few actually) who had the audacity to ask about diversity in hiring. As though it has anything to do with the issues in the press conference, or for that matter is a relevant question for Sarah. Wouldn't that be BETTER served for a PR person? I'm sure the WH has people who can answer personnel questions if they're that damn curious(of course, we know they're not.)

Then they spent the better part of 8-9 minutes trying to equate the names listed yesterday as part of an 'enemies' list, and despite numerous dumb asses asking the same question(and getting the same answer) they continued to ask. Because that's how much they valued their time to question(sarcasm)

Our media is unreliable, it has hired people of the lowest possible grade to do what JFK once called the 'tremendous task of alerting and informing the American People.' These dumb asses should start by informing themselves. Or they should resign if they can't do that.

Or close down the Press Corps(not like people are watching) if the only effect of it is for Ms. Sanders to suffer through the insufferable. I wouldn't wish hanging out with such dregs of losers on anybody. A room pit of misery with the lowest IQ trash.

 

I think they might as well get rid of her press conferences. She never answers a question.
Why not just come out with it?
Yep he took away their clearance because they made him mad.
Yep, he said the N word.
Why play stupid and uninformed by the boss?

 

Wow! It isn't often we are treated to such a display of judgmental arrogance. "Lowest IQ trash," "dregs of losers," "dumb asses," etc. This is what happens when a divisive president gives voice to the lowest inclinations of their followers - it enables them to spill their pent up frustration and venom onto the streets. The rest of us have to rely on our restraint and good manners to make our arguments. We get to talk at the family Thanksgiving gathering.

Ms.Sanders suffering is nothing compared to the press cops frustration at their inability to extract truth from the podium. One journalist left the room in utter dismay exclaiming, "I can't stand any more of this lying." The difference between Ms. Sanders and Baghdad Bob is that Baghdad Bob dressed well and was likable.

 

Unintelligent people deserve to be called out for their lack of intelligence. Questions which don't deserve to be answered, shouldn't be answered. And no, it's not 'when a divisive president gives voice to the lowest inclination of their followers'. The president didn't "pay" or "order" me to have the contempt for these scumbags. I have them naturally.

The American People deserve to have thought-provoking questions asked, you might then get some actual insightful information. But given the low IQ that permeated the room, you saw the results. I'm rather open about my hatred, bigotry and malice towards all stupid people. Stupidity isn't a crime, but sometimes it should be one. It's just jarring to the rest of us normal IQ people.

 

For the sake of the discussion, what "thought-provoking" question would you ask if given the chance given your assumed high IQ.

 

"The new report came out that retail sales have increased exponentially which of course is good news. How does the administration plan to try and stay ahead of economic developments and keep it from bottoming out as some critics would say could happen?"

An actual thoughtful question that would give a valuable insight.

 

The WH press corps are indeed the dregs. When the establishment is out of power, these walking talking examples of Dunning Kruger no longer have the cozy, do-nothing, graft career paths available in government and lobbies. When it is threatened that the public is turning away from them, they have -nothing- to sell to the graft mills after their mediocre press employment ends. That many of them are millionaires based on the disservice they do to the country is a testament to the truth of the old Peter Principle.

Day in and day out, it's 8th grade awareness, literacy and skill on display... but from supposedly highly competent adults. There is no greater farce in U.S. public life today than the WH Press Corps, and the low level of discourse they engage in is unprecedented in U.S. press history.

Trump called "fake news" the enemy of the people. I will go one step further and state that the current iteration of the U.S. press AT LARGE is the demonstrated enemy of the people. Their collusive editorial titty baby whining today across the country proves this unequivocally.

 

You know what else the American people deserve? Honesty from the podium of the press briefing room. Yet Sarah lies and spins the truth on a daily basis.

More than 300 US newspapers run editorials promoting press freedom after Trump attacks on media

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/16/us-...ess-freedom-after-trump-attacks-on-media.html

 

The New York Times, meanwhile, acknowledged that criticism of the news media for under or overplaying stories or for errors was the correct thing to do, but stated: "Insisting that truths you don't like are 'fake news' is dangerous to the lifeblood of democracy. And calling journalists the 'enemy of the people' is dangerous, period."

Meanwhile in North Dakota, where Trump received 63 percent of the vote, The Journal and The Tioga Tribune's editors wrote: "Rather than entertaining the notion of silencing any opposition, citizens need now, more than ever, to challenge themselves to hear multiple views, not take the word of those attempting to quash critical thinking."

Those who agree with the Grifter-in-Chief the press is the enemy of the people are the insufferable fools.

 

It is a good question and one Sanders wouldn't be prepared to answer. Why? Because the answer would call for a plan. Plans are not this administrations strong point. They never have one.

 

For the sake of the discussion, what "thought-provoking" question would you ask if given the chance given your assumed high IQ.[/QUOTEI]

I just thought of something, before 2016 one of the most importants questions Democrats wanted asked and answered was, do you wear boxers or briefs ?

Why didn't the media ask Hillary what kind of panties she wore ?Post #10


That question isn't in the "high IQ" category.

 

But was asked in 1992, 2000 and 2008 by CNN.

 

Guessing to incoming Presidents. In what context? They do joke sometimes, but more to the point is the question was "what would YOU ask".

 

Why say things that aren't true?

 

And in what way are they being curtailed from their precious 'press freedom'? I used the word 'insufferable' purposefully. Demonstrated example #1: The crusade for press freedom. They're not being assassinated or poisoned as in Russia, or NK or in Venezuela. And no, despite removing security clearances, Brennan can still yap his mouth. It would appear, that the 'assassination' of press freedom is indeed that criticism that the dude said was okay. So he's talking out of his ass, just like every other media personality since the 2016 elections.

Their mocked cries, which earn them nothing but scorn from non-Democrat Americans make a mockery out of countries where press freedoms really are curtailed.

I swear, TDS is a thing and it's absolutely ridiculous at this point. We all need to step back, acknowledge him as POTUS and move on.

 

Well, to be fair, at least one of those times it wasn't actually CNN it was During Obama's appearance on MTV, as he pretended to be all hip and cool, by one of the geniuses they selected for their audience participation group. Of all the questions I might wish to ask a presidential candidate, that doesn't rank in the top 5000.

 

they are some stupid mother fckers. not just because of their stupid questions, but because the corrupt hacks stupidly believe no one can see through their 'legitimate media' act.

 

Well, Spanky just confirmed he was mad about the Russia probe. So one down, one to go.

Waiting now for a tape from the Apprentice..

Stay away from 5th avenue.

 

More and more people are starting to push back.

William McRaven, a retired Navy admiral who served as commander of the U.S. Joint Special Operations Command from 2011 to 2014, wrote an opinion piece for The Washington Post Thursday asking President Trump to revoke his security clearance in solidarity with former CIA director James Brennan, who had his security clearance revoked Wednesday. McRaven oversaw the 2011 Navy SEAL raid in Pakistan that killed al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bin-la...-asks-trump-to-revoke-his-security-clearance/

 

More insuffering. Have you noticed these people have used the clout of their 'public service' status to presume themselves to be untouchable?
They think of themselves as the apostle of the State. They're just servants of it, and need to be reminded of that.

 

When you have given your life to the service of your country, you probably don't suffer to much BS from a draft dodger.

 

When I see the WH press on TV, they are rude crude and stupid.

 

A stunning rebuke.

 

duplicate