It's called comic relief. Wal Mart has already discounted it the day it came out. How's that not funny?
Judge Gorsuch is another good thing, we need more judges who can judge impartially with respect to the law. It's sad that Dems played obstructionism, instead of widely nominating a superior judge.
It's like a car wreck you're seeing and can't turn away, besides it's funny as hell. Just me, myself and I in my head.
It's more about being fascinated that this deranged congenital liar insists on staying in the spot light. If Hillary goes away, the so called "obsession" will disappear. Make sense?
October 15, 2005... #1 USC travels to South Bend, IN to play #9 Notre Dame. Notre Dame is up 31 - 28 with 3 seconds left and USC QB Matt Leinart gets the ball on the goal line and pushes for the end zone. Reggie Bush pushes Leinart far enough to cross the line and USC wins the ballgame. After review, Bush's push was illegal and should have drawn a penalty but the refs didn't call it a penalty and USC won the game. Fast forward 12 years later to August 4, 2017 and Brady Quinn, 2005 Notre Dame's QB is still talking about how USC cheated. Point is, even though Quinn was right and Notre Dame should have won that game, everyone got over it and now Quinn looks like a sore loser. Now imagine how bad it is when you lose because you weren't as good as your opponent and then you STILL try to point your finger and place blame somewhere else, that's even worse than a sore loser... That's Clinton. At least Quinn was actually right.
There were preorders. Plus some of the reviews are likely just trolls. Hmm... 3 possible reasons, pick 1: 1) Huge George Soros conspiracy 2) Amazon deleted all them 3) They're still there but some people apparently can't find them... I'll give you a hint, the answer is #3.
Hey I wouldn't doubt it one second... The Clinton Foundation, Hollywood, New York, Katy Perry, Bruce Springsteen, Forrest Gump, George Clooney, and the list goes on... What's a couple hundred thousand out of their pockets....? That'll purchase 11,117 books. From the looks of it, there's a lot of buying and no reading... And Amazon is wiping out the 1 star reviews. I was going to leave one to ask why they were doing that and I wasn't a verified buyer, so that tells me that they're wiping out the opinions of those who bought the book and didn't like it.
#2 you mean? I don't need your washed out troll responses. When the review count goes from 1,852 to 711 and the 1 star reviews go away, that means they were deleted, not misplaced. It don't work that way. At least I can better understand, now, why you don't think Hillary deleted 33,000 emails. Bully for you on getting the most confused forum member to like your post. Heh.
Same dud just claimed it's pathetic to talk about losers when half of her posts call Trump a loser. Such a ****ing tool.
Yeah, you don't see liberals starting threads on it. We only make fun of the obvious hypocracy of Trumpster complaining about her credibility! LOL!
If that were the case, they'e be taking a page out of the right wing playbook. Right wing screeds by folks like Ann Coulter, Limbaugh, Gingrich, etc are routinely bulk bought by right wing organizations and promoters and used as giveaways to get people to sign up to their blog or organization. This has been going on for over twenty years now. I remember how the right winger ranted when the New York Times added an asterisk next to the rankings on their bestseller list. The asterisk was sub labelled (indicates evidence of bulk buying). They hated being caught at that. The tactic has not only been used to attract eyeballs to websites, but also to put money in the pockets of right wing screed authors and promote the illusion that their screeds were more popular and reached a wider audience than they actually did. That one small change exposed the practice (but did not end it). My how the right wing noise machine howled!
Interesting. What happened to Hillary's credibility, in your mind, when she intentionally lied to the families of the Benghazi dead? I'd like to know how you rationalized one of the worst lies that could possibly be told to grieving human beings. Help a "righty" understand how that works.
Absolutely... This Republican would never vote for a democrat but he certainly would have gotten my vote, at least from that point...
I don't see this in the way that you do. But then, I didn't buy the fake right wing narrative either. On the day of the attack, there was no definitive conclusion that this was a terrorist attack. There was plenty of reason to believe that the American produced anti Muslim video that was going viral all over the Middle East was the culprit. There had been riots in several countries over that. (how do you explain to grieving human beings that their loved ones got killed because of some right wing crackpots in the US????) In any event, the story only lasted about three days. Contrast that with the way the Bush Administration repeatedly claimed that Bin Laden was probably dead. Or, how about the way Trump jumped to conclusion and labelled an airplane crash as a terrorist attack?
Well then it's probably highly likely that that's what's happening here... I'm disappointed in Amazon's deleting of negative reviews though.
That could well be. I don't care either way. I'll probably watch her interview tonight, but I had not planned on buying the book. I almost never buy books by politicians, at least not until they are at the memoirs stage, anyway.
Of course there was reason. They attacked our embassies, 'coincidentally' on the anniversary of the biggest terrorist attack on US Soil. Romney called it what it was, and the media hit back to ensure Obama's reelection. I remember that dirty play. And in hindsight, Romney's "47%" gaffe was less brutal than the "deplorables" statement by the lady in question. Since unfortunately, it's true: Many Americans are making so little money as to need to draw welfare.
But there WAS a definitive conclusion the day after the attack. Hillary told the Egyptian PM the following: "We know that the attack in Libya has nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack not a protest". http://benghazi.house.gov/sites/republicans.benghazi.house.gov/files/documents/Tab 79.pdf Tom, notice the wording of this rather definitive statement. There is no "we're not sure at this point". There is no "we need more time to investigate and sort out events". It's an unambiguous statement of fact regarding the US assessment of the attack. So will you explain how this is all a right wing narrative?? Then 2 days later at the casket ceremony, she looked into the eyes of the families of the Benghazi dead and told the lie of video. Here is what the uncle of foreign service officer Sean Smith, who was killed in Benghazi, recently said about her comments: "She's been in plausible deniability about Benghazi ever since it happened," Michael Ingmire told Fox News. "She was standing, basically before the coffins of Americans, blaming a horrible anti-Islamic video, but she's just being consistent with her psychosis. The liar, the criminal, the crooked politician -- those are the three faces of Hillary." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...enghazi-tragedy-hurt-her-politically.amp.html Before you start attacking Michael Ingmire's credibility, remember that Hillary told the same video story separately to 2 of the other families. The bottom line is 3 different families didn't lie. BTW, the Obama Administration continued to pander the video narrative for several weeks. Given that Obama's re-election was just 2 months away, they didn't want any perception that they were weak on terror. Whatever Obama's failures as a leader, he sure more than made up for in political manipulation. So Tom, maybe you can explain why you don't see it the way I do. The events leave little to the imagination.
