International Code Council agree's with NIST too

Adding to the list of organisations who agree with the NIST findings, is the International Code Council;

Source.

Guess they were bribed, right guys?

 

Jurisdictions have the option of incorporating some or all [OR NONE] of the code's provisions, Sunder said.

If they tried to enforce them suits would fly and their asses would get dragged over the coals proving fraud and their whole house of cards would be destroyed.

this thread at best deserves the highest levels of ridicule if its intent was to validate NISTs bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
​

 

or none? Doesn't say that anywhere. Or even insinuate. Some, or all, does not mean none. NIST doesn't need validating. Its findings are now in code. Fail again, koko.

 

Good, great. Still doesn't close out the 9/11 conspiracy though.

 

Right fraud,show the 'lies'

I'll wait.

 

You think they don't occasionally read the posts?

 

LoL you certainly do have an inflated sense of self worth. You really think you're worth the hassle? Get over yourself, Jango. You're not even in the top 5 of "most intelligent" truthers I've seen. You're a fence sitter, and one of the worst. You're too scared to come up with an actual theory, like all truthers. You nitpick and bring up ridiculous arguing points like they mean something. You handwaive anything contradicting your ideals whining about how it's "MSM" or a "government website" or it's "JREF". Meaning that no matter what you can keep those blinders on non-stop.

All said and done...grow a pair. Either admit that your whole theory behind 9/11 is completely stupid and not backed by any evidence, or come out and tell us exactly what your theory is and how it happened. At least that way I can have a good laugh while I, step-by-step, debunk the idiocy which you believe in.

I'll be over here, holding my breath.

 

One thing, you know I like the media. Though I've lost considerable respect for CNN over their anti-2nd amendment stance. I still watch them though. So it is blatantly false that I do what you what claim I do: back up your assertion with evidence. No excuses.

As to government sources, I'm skeptical. Governments lie, cover their asses, distort the truth, spin, etc. We've, as a nation, seen this phenomenon for a very long time. So I apologize that I don't take things at face value by my government.

Regarding JREF, I dislike the holier than thou sentiment. The place serves as an echo chamber too, similar to Let's Roll. There seems to be a large aversion to speculation, which is odd considering the level of classification and secrecy involved with 9/11. Overall though, the place is its own unique niche on the Internet... one where all conspiracies are ridiculous and not worthy of serious thought.


You asked for my theory. Would you prefer I open another thread for that? And how do you wish it to be presented? Anything in particular you want me to include / not include?

 

I don't care, I probably won't participate in it, as it will more than likely be extremely political....and I could give a (*)(*)(*)(*). As for the rest, arguing with you is worthless. If you were going to learn anything from me, you would have done it by now. You can, happily, start the thread though. I know there will be others here to shred it.

I have the next 3 days off. I have no intentions of doing anything other than clean my lake cabin, sit on the pantoon, go fishing, and drink. You can do whatever you'd like sir.

 

What about the physical aspects of 9/11 (the topic of this thread) is not closed?

 

yep as usual,as always, he is getting desperate now.hee hee.this thread is even more desperate than tha laughable first thread he made with the blog thats been throughly debunked by several experts.hee hee.

- - - Updated - - -

stands up and gives standing ovation.thats the understatement of the century.

 

Is there ever an instance where someone stands up, yet still gives a seated ovation?

 

you so much tell it like it is.I love it.well done.

- - - Updated - - -

another standing ovation issued.
and attention as well.


Good, great. Still doesn't close out the 9/11 conspiracy though.

nope.sure doesnt.

 

thats pretty much all he has done since day one.

Awe, someone cried to the moderators.

ever notice that the OCTA'S "ALWAYS" go and whine to the mods like crybabies? They hate the truth being told and getting their arses handed to them on a platter so they always go and whine to them.

 

Standing ovations....ALL AROUND. JANGO, RTW, 9/11!!! Who else wants one? They're going quick, they're going cheap, I have to be CRAZY to give away this many standing ovations!!! Can you believe it?

- - - Updated - - -

Totally...I hate that guy. It's like...wtf, right?

 

OCTA'S only see what they want to see so it would just be a waste of time presenting it to them.

 

Your little cheerleader skirt is riding up, Miss.

 

What are you ranting about the moderators for? I show Hannibal's post on the 6th of July, then everything else is from today. I don't see anything being removed, edited, or moderated.

Which begs me to think that you might be an apple short of a fruitbasket.

 

Ahh the dishonesty of koko and his sock puppet....neglecting to mention the [OR NONE] wasn't in the original article,but added by koko

- - - Updated - - -

Redundancy.....traits of the truther

 

Hee Hee....

 

Wow!

At first I thought I was missing something.
Then I looked at the forum location and realized
Just another looney toon!

What a maroon!
That's all folks.