"Belgian former pro cyclist-turned-reporter Sven Spoormakers set off a sexism storm on social media with his comments on a female reporter covering an event in Argentina." Obviously there is no serious definition of "sexism" and for cause-pushers this is deliberate. The "sex" in his image is the female reporter. The reaction to another reporter's crass comment shows there must be restraint upon male behavior - but no restraint upon female behavior. The woman wore no bra and her top is open. That's fine if you want to attract male attention. Both reporters lacked modesty - but the woman is allowed to be immodest, and that's the real sexism. https://www.rt.com/sport/479598-spoormakers-cycling-reporter-argentina-sexism-row/
I don't have a problem with it as long as male reporters can wear tight revealing pants while working womens sports.
And of course, if we could destroy the career and life of any woman who commented on the tight pants.
If you're going to show them off don't expect people to not notice. And getting pissy because someone commented on your display, does not make you a strong woman, it makes you a pissy little girl.
The graphic reminded me of one word -- Exhibitionism. Usually means exposure of the individual's "parts" to an unsuspecting stranger. This female is one grade above a "flasher".