Is the Trump impeachment dead?

Impeachment is not quite yet DOA while Maxine has a pulse. Impeachment is under the delirious influence of a wild cocktail of street drugs; it's on the gurney and the Narcan is getting no results.

 

Well when the AG believes that a sitting president cant be charged with any crime ( which is the reason that Barr got the job. He is nothing more than Trumps boot licking lackey ), then congress can and must exercise its power of oversight.

 

When did the Democrats file articles of impeachment?
I must have missed it?

 

He can't be PROSECUTED until he is out of office, there is no such prohibition to bringing a criminal charge. Congress cannot charge someone with a crime let alone prosecute someone for a crime nor would we ever want such a partisan political body to do so.

 

why would I attack the Mueller report, the Barr summary is what I disagreed with

 

And if he wins re-election, the statute of limitations will run out on many of his crimes, making him totally immune.

 

He hasn't been charged with any crimes and the grand jury could vote the indictment now and the prosecution delayed. Starr took specific criminal charges to Congress to seek Clinton's removal from office and had a grand jury indictment which was presented to Clinton by Robert Ray as he left office. There are no charges awaiting Clinton even if he is removed by a phony impeachment which ain't gonna happen.

 

You attack him as just a Republican and thus his report. Where do you claim the Barr summary went astray Mueller is reported to have agreed with the summary?

 

nope, I am saying he is a republican, is that an attack on Mueller?

Mueller did not agree with the summary

 

Impeachment is indeed dead. Even WikiLeaks/Julian Assange stated that what they actually had on Trump didn't really have any impact than what he already have done over Twitter.

For two years we've heard this "Trump Russia possible collusion" bullcrap, for only those collusion leads leading to the Dems instead. Funny that.

This have aged well, I have to say.

 

What was the purpose of noting he is a Republican and saying that Republicans choose him? Quote Mueller saying he did not agree with the summary conclusions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...82d3f3d96d5_story.html?utm_term=.f31940e0268c

Barr also gave Mueller his personal phone number and told him to call if he had future concerns, officials said.

Throughout the conversation, Mueller’s main worry was that the public was not getting an accurate understanding of the obstruction investigation, officials said.

“After the Attorney General received Special Counsel Mueller’s letter, he called him to discuss it,” a Justice Department spokeswoman said Tuesday evening in a statement. “In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel’s obstruction analysis. They then discussed whether additional context from the report would be helpful and could be quickly released.

“However, the Attorney General ultimately determined that it would not be productive to release the report in piecemeal fashion,” the spokeswoman said. “The Attorney General and the Special Counsel agreed to get the full report out with necessary redactions as expeditiously as possible. The next day, the Attorney General sent a letter to Congress reiterating that his March 24 letter was not intended to be a summary of the report, but instead only stated the Special Counsel’s principal conclusions, and volunteered to testify before both Senate and House Judiciary Committees on May 1 and 2.”

 

Impeachment is deader than disco.

 

the purpose is to show he was not a liberal, the right often tries to make it seem this was the left investigating Trump, it wasn't

 

How many of the prosecutors on his team were Republicans? And I have no idea if Mueller is a liberal or a conservative. A big so what?

 

there were some of both parties I do not know the numbers, it was a bipartisan investigation which I think is good and was needed in this case

are you attacking the report now?

 

It was the Deep State investigating Trump and the Deep State is bipartisan.

 

Nope they were all Democrat donors some of whom even attended her planned inauguration party. It was a partisan investigation and even at that could find nothing to charge Trump with.

 

There is no factual or evidentary distinction what is your disagreement?

 

Trump wouldn't and won't go along to get along, thus enters Mueller as special counsel "chief" investigator -- and it's now in question if he was running the show.

 

Sounds a lot like the South Africans land grabs, killing off the white farmers and stealing "back" the land. After having done so, they just sit there on the land and go hungry. Democrats want so bad to take the power back, but if they are successful they will just sit there in office, having no other priority other than to defeat Trump in the election.

 

It's good that you are embarrassed.

 

I wish democrats would make peace with Trump being president, but you all just want something to complain and whine about. My life hasn't changed since he became president, yours must of gotten worse, but that's not Trumps fault, it's yours.

 

Yes, he's one more idiot who's delusional.

 

The division is in your heart. Trump is merely revealing it.

 

My Cardio checkup is fine, thank you