Islam has replaced communism.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/...e-terrorist-acts-that-have-occurred-in-the-us

What load of absolute garbage...but typical taqiyya from the left...

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/...tandard-swedish-with-migrant-inclusive-accent

Sweden...gone...finished...cactus....rooted...Swedenistan..

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/...llation-of-president-trumps-state-visit-to-uk

Just have a look at the arrogant schmuck...

Quotes from link:

Sadiq Khan said: “I am quite clear, this ban is cruel, this ban is shameful, while this ban is in place we should not be rolling out the red carpet for President Trump.”

Let’s put this in perspective. Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain. Sadiq Khan didn’t say anything.

The UK Home Office recently admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.” Sadiq Khan didn’t say a word.

May’s government also recently admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Sadiq Khan didn’t protest.

Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country. Sadiq Khan didn’t raise a fuss.

But the U.S. trying to defend itself from jihad terrorists? That’s over the line for Sadiq Khan!

somehistory says
January 31, 2017 at 10:55 am

So he demands. Who cares? Yes, he is clear…through and through clear, that he is a moslim with satanic chips on his shoulders telling him that he has every *right* to be arrogant because he is so *superior* to everyone else. The head back, the crossed arms and the *tough* look on his face. Yes, all of the U.K. should bend to his “demand” and bow to the beast of islam.

gravenimage says
January 31, 2017 at 7:08 pm

Khan’s not so hidden agenda is furthering the Islamolization of Britain.


Charli Main says
January 31, 2017 at 12:59 pm

Its the Muslim huggers and Muslim apologists that are paving the way for the Islamisation of Britain. Muslims are doing what they are doing in Britain because they are being allowed to do it.

IQ al Rassooli says
January 31, 2017 at 2:10 pm

For as long as necessary I shall keep on PROVING that NO Muslim can ever be a LOYAL Citizen among non Muslim/ Kuffar/ Infidels

Mayor Khan with all of his OUTWARD appearances is nonetheless a closeted Muslim

Merkel has repeatedly called the Muslim INVASION a BURDEN that should be shared

No one in the leftist brain dead media asked her: Since they are a BURDEN, WHY are you allowing them in Europe?

WHY also ask the American people to SHARE this UNNECESSARY and avoidable Burden? Americans have to be utterly STUPID to add to their problems (except if they are Leftist/ Liberals)

Dear American KUFFAR, please always remember that as Infidels/ Kuffar/ Non Muslims, you are NOT the only ones targeted for EXTERMINATION by Muslims (Arabs or otherwise) hence it is VITAL that you realize that one does not need more than two brain cells of logic to understand Muslims & Islam in a nutshell~

Since every Muslim is Sharia compliant, every Muslim cannot ever be a Law abiding LOYAL citizen in ANY non Muslim nation because these nations do not submit to Allah’s Sharia.

Hence every Muslim is the enemy of every none Muslim Infidel/ Kafir on planet Earth (80% of current of non Muslim humanity)

Every Muslim is a potential Mass Murderer the instant he/ she decides that he/she is NOT Sharia compliant enough. (Not ALL Muslims are Terrorists but ALL Terrorists against Infidels are MUSLIMS)

Every Muslim is therefore a hair trigger Time Bomb primed to go off

Only in the WARPED imagination of leftists can one find Moderate Militant Radical or Extremist Muslims because in reality Muslims are Muslims just as Nazis are Nazis and no one ever addressed Nazis as Moderate Militant Radical or Extremist

Therefore, because Sharia prohibits them, no Muslim can ever be LOYAL to the laws or the peoples who are Infidels/ Kuffar

All other explanations are superfluous and redundant

It is time for every decent human being to unshackle yourselves from the pre conceived but erroneous notions that ANYONE who is not a Muslim can make PEACE with Islam. All anyone in doubt has to do is READ only chapter 1 to 9 of Muhammad’s Quran

Keeping Americans SAFE from MUSLIM terrorists must be one of the PRIMARY reasons WHY DJ Trump was elected President in the first place. He is only fulfilling what he PROMISED “We the People” he would do.

In summation: To HELL with the Human Rights, Civil Liberties, ACLU, ISNA, CAIR and associated TRAITORS in the USA!

IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!
http://www.alrassooli.com
MAGA & DTS!

End quotes

A wise man once said.."you may be concerned about your neighbours burdon, but you dont have to carry it"

 

http://madworldnews.com/muslim-brides-virginity-test/

Must be a virgin bride....that would have to be a stone age ruling if I ever saw one...
But then again if youre only 12..well..its possible...
Wouldnt it be fun married at 12 to a muslim man about 50.....can only feel sorry for
the little girls who have to go through this.....oh yes... and theres also female genital
mutilation to begin life....and if you arent a virgin bride...oh well...you just get murdered....
Where are all the female activists....this must be in the too hard tray....

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/...es-cross-from-logo-to-avoid-offending-muslims

Dear oh dear...we cant offend muslims can we..football clubs changing their logo because it has a cross
in it..we have to be sensitive towards other values.
As the link says Of course. But where do Muslims ever display a similar sensitivity to non-Muslims? The old adage always holds: when in Muslim countries, conform your behavior to suit Muslim sensibilities. When in non-Muslim countries, conform your behavior to suit Muslim sensibilities.

How long will it be before St George RLFC and St Kilda AFLC have to change their names/logo
so they dont upset muslims...

Getting a bit ridiculous isnt it....

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-02/trump-slams-dumb-refugee-deal/8235820

Well, if our politicians have to kiss islamic Indonesias @rse by not towing the boats back, this
is the result. We get stuck with the economic wanderers that have come through islamic
Indonesia.
But once again our politicians cant upset any nation, we have to cowtail to one and all,
and if that includes an islamic nation, then its a no brainer, we just have to be nice.....

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/...d-police-raid-54-mosques-homes-and-businesses

Quotes from link:
somehistory says
February 1, 2017 at 1:13 pm

Well, well, well. islam is connected to terror after all.

End quotes from comments.
Other quotes:

Police stormed 54 homes, mosques and businesses in the state of Hesse in the early hours of the morning in an operation targeting extremists planning “serious state-threatening violence”.

End quotes

The question I would ask is: why is it necessary for the Police to raid mosques?
Arent all imams and muslim clerics/scholars beyond reproach?
I would have thought that mosques would have been the last place Police would
raid in suspicion of a crime being committed or perpetrated.
Mosques are a place of worship, where all muslims go to pray and learn about
their religion/ideology.
A mosque is a place of peace, a place where the imam gives guidance to the old
and the young, the frail and the vulnerable.
Goodness me, why would the Police interfere with the reverence of a place of worship.

Could it be then, that mosques are more than just the above....who would have thought....

 

Here we go again, another police cover up...

http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/news/two-teens-and-a-woman-injured-in-stabbing-at-a-sydney-high-school/news-story/fc8c2edcb74187a538b335873cd3d369

Not terrorism related, yeah right ....COVER UP

I mean look at it, he used a knife, classic terrorist weapon, some of those murdering Muslims give their son's knives when they become men, at 9 or so when they are thinking of getting married. He was found with a meat cleaver, a meat cleaver mind you, what would a 15 year old boy from Bonnyrigg want a meat cleaver for, was he an apprentice butcher, I bet it was halal if he was. Heads, cutting heads off, that is why he had it, heads, slit, slop, flop.

OH OH OH last minute edit, nearly forgot, see his hair...that's right, it's black, yes that's right, he has black hair. 80% of known terrorists have black hair.

OH and I do believe he worshiped Allah, not God oh no he hated God. I believe he once stood in front of his mother and shouted "Oh God I hate you"

what more proof do you need?

I'm sure someone must have heard him shouting Allahu akbar I will check facebook.

This is a paid political announcement by Abdula's Gun Shop, the family gun shop, for all your armament needs.

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/...cked-off-by-husband-for-speaking-to-other-men

Defend islam all you, but you wont find me defending it after reading this...

Quote from link:

A former child bride has had her ears hacked off by her husband after he accused her of speaking to other men.

Reza Gul, 20, had her nose sliced off by her husband in an attack in January last year.

“Women’s rights constitute the only valid indicator for democracy,” according to the report below. That is a true statement, but sadly, women continue to be deplorably abused across the Islamic world and to an extreme extent in Afghanistan, where men get away with murder.

Right before Christmas, a disgusting report described some “horrific cases” of women and girls being abused in Afghanistan….

that a man had incised the nose and lips of his 30-year-old wife…. two innocent women were hanged from a tree in Logar province….. a group of unidentified gunmen had raped a 12-year-old girl in Baghlan province of northern Afghanistan…. a 15-year-old girl from Herat province told a human rights reporter that she was beaten by her husband and father-in-law at least three or four times every day.

Those are just a few stories, but Western leftists have no mercy on these innocent women and girls, because when they see abuse that is sanctioned by Islamic texts, they do not judge it by the same standard or rules.Former child bride has her EARS hacked off by her husband in Afghanistan after he accused her of speaking to other men”, Daily Mail, by Gareth Davies, February 1, 2017:

A former child bride has had her ears hacked off by her husband after he accused her of speaking to other men.

Zarina from Afghanistan got married at the age of 13 and her husband is on the run having attacked her.

The couple were sleeping at their home in the northern province of Balkh when he suddenly woke her up, bound her and mutilated her.

Having suffered the beating, she told the BBC: ‘I haven’t committed any sin.

‘I don’t know why my husband did this to me.’

Zarina said her husband had tried to stop her from seeing her parents, and that she wanted to divorce him.

‘He is a very suspicious man and often accused me of talking to strange men when I went to visit my parents,’ she told Tolo News.

Sadly, her case is not an isolated on in Afghanistan.

Reza Gul, 20, had her nose sliced off by her husband in an attack in January last year.

Sadly, the domestic abuse victim’s account is not a one-off.

Girls as young as six in Afghanistan are being forced to marry men old enough to be their grandfather and into a life of sexual slavery, beatings, pregnancies and death during childbirth, a charity said last month.

More than 12,000 girls under 15 will become child brides every day of 2017 around the world – or one every seven seconds.

The disturbing figures are revealed in exhaustive research and analysis carried out by the UK-based charity Save the Children, who predict 15 million schoolgirls of 15 or younger will marry in 2017.

UK aid workers highlight a shocking catalogue of cases where young married girls face domestic violence, abuse and rape.

In one, a six year-old girl is reported to have been ‘sold’ into marriage with a man more than 40 years older in exchange for a goat in Afghanistan while Afghans are also said to use the marriage of their pre-teenage-daughters to settle disputes….

Dave says
February 2, 2017 at 10:36 am

And we are bringing in these savages ? And Left/Liberals want them in ?

Trump should start deporting these criminals and their supporters like Iceland Police are doing here http://tinyurl.com/jqbvanr

Immigration of muslims is a deliberate plan. Its been deliberate trojan horse program in action or “vicious snakes” as Trump kept warning people about http://tinyurl.com/gwfxa8s

Angemon says
February 2, 2017 at 11:12 am

Girls as young as six in Afghanistan are being forced to marry men old enough to be their grandfather and into a life of sexual slavery, beatings, pregnancies and death during childbirth, a charity said last month.

Repulsive? Yes. Islamic? Yes. All according to the example of muhammad, who married Aisha when she was six.

DRHazard says
February 2, 2017 at 3:27 pm

This is the example some Muslim men set for their sons. Marry for sex, your wife is your property, there is no love or respect, women are to shutup, stay home and obey. All in all it sets an example of perpetual relationship dysfunction that gets the stamp of approval from Allah and his spokesmen.

End quotes

And this is the ideology/religion that leftists defend and Turnbull tells us to embrace.
Not me...not while my @rse points to the ground....

 

Defending the truth IS NOT defending Islam, it is defending TRUTH.

The terrorists use lies and propaganda, you are often helping spread those lies and propaganda inadvertently promoting terrorism. Their weapon is fear, but they are not the only ones who use fear as a weapon, nor gain power because of it.

I look at what I see objectively, to even think that every Muslim is an enemy is absurd, and to honestly believe that Sharia law will take over the world is even more ludicrous. Most dominantly Muslim countries are not ruled by sharia law, some do have Sharia courts for things like property settlement and divorce but most follow international standards and norms on laws like age of consent etc.

Yes there is a major world wide conspiracy to take over the western world and have a very fundamentalist and obscure version of Islam. As far as any religion goes, they are all the manufacture of man, so why would I defend an ideology I don't believe in. Like I say, it is truth I am defending, sanity and reason. You defend what you want, but you are actually promoting what you are fighting. Terrorism works by spreading terror, all you are achieving is to help them achieve their goals.

THAT IS WHY I ARGUE

 

You contradiict yourself in paras 2 and 3
You havent told me yet why sharia courts are presided over by men only
You are not defending the truth. Defend my last post then if you are.
I am not spreading fear, I am attempting to alert people as to what happens
in islamic countries.
Should we all keep quiet then about islam, and not say a word.
Isnt that the perfect way of letting islam spread.
Isnt that another way of curbing free speech, by convincing people to be quiet

 

sharia courts are presided over by men because that is what it says somewhere.
I will get back to you on your last post, I have some things to do and will look at it this afternoon.
Spreading what is 99% suspiciously like a concocted story about the guy in Melbourne who drove the car into the crowd is not alerting people to anything except that you are a fool.
No we should all be talking about Islam, hopefully truthfully, without bias and well researched, we should also all be talking about terrorism and how they use the teachings of the Koran and Mohammad to justify what they do.
Yes it is, if people study Islam closely and decide to convert then fine, we are a religious tolerant country and people in Australia have religious freedom, that's what so many died for. We should do EVERYTHING in our power however to stop religious extremists of any ilk.
No telling the truth does not curb free speech, prosecuting people for giving alternative truths is also OK if those alternative truths cause harm of any sort.
There is only ONE alternative to the truth, although it comes in many guises, but it is still a lie

THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH
is exactly not equal to
THE RIGHT TO LIE​

 

OK give me a link where it states that sharia courts are presided over by women.
You wont find one, because it is totally contradictive to the islamic doctrine that women are
only half the value of men. Therefore how could a woman be permitted to preside over men
in a sharia court.
Also, if you look at the thread on the Melbourne incident in the American forum, you will find that I withdrew from the discussion out of respect for the victims and their families. Never at any stage did I go on about the pos being a muslim.
I think youve got your wires crossed there. The only person talking incessantly about him being a muslim
was guavaball, not me.
As far as talking about islam, this is what I attempting to encourage. If people read this thread and do their
own research, then they can form their own conclusions, just as you have. The fact that my conclusion may be
totally different to someone elses matters nought. The fact of the matter is people are becoming more aware
of islam. Only recently I was talking to someone in the lift about islam. I saw him a few days later, and he told
me he had borrowed books from the library about islam to study.
People dont have to believe my thread. Im not holding a gun to anyones head.
If they think that its rubbish, then so be it...no skin off my nose...

 

Thinks will change, they need our support, people are trying to change millenniums of culture overnight, it won't happen overnight but it will happen despite efforts of people like you and Jihadwatch.org doing your utmost to stop it. Your pretense at concern for the women's rights is sickening when you ran a thread here condemning modern women for wearing short skirts because YOU didn't know where to look on escalators, another that was an electronic page 3 that openly objectified women and now you have the hide to try and take the high ground.

https://karmicreaction.com/2017/02/01/wcw-judge-kholoud-faqih/

 

Well, good for her and her friend..although they would be considered as exceptions to the rule.
Hopefully, there will be more female islamic judges.
My pretense for womens rights as you put it is for the rights of islamic women..
I have always referred to the rights of islamic women on this thread, have I not..
as they are the people who need more rights to place them on an equivalent footing
to the abusive men they so subserviently bow to.
Your referral to my other threads is just a strawman. Why dont you talk about FGM or
posts involving beheading of a woman for going shopping without her husband, or the amputating of a womans
ears because she spoke to a man, or maybe the murder of a muslim woman in Trinidad as an honour
killing which is commanded by the koran...nothing from you about these issues, but you drag up another
thread just to discredit me....why dont you give me your opinion on one topic..lets say honour killings...
You are a real piece of work.

 

because all those things are happening in a different world in a different time, they just don't know it isn't.

All these things are so minor as far as numbers. OK so a few thousand Muslim women have something horrible done, so your answer is to debase them all, guilty or innocent. You make it your business to take every opportunity to denigrate their most holiest of holiest, and why, because a few radicals go around terrorizing people, a few thousand preach that unbelievers should all die.

You do nothing but lie, manipulate the truth, throw insults at anyone who has the slightest difference of opinion.

I do not comment on every trivial piece of garbage you post, but some of it is so obviously concocted I cannot help myself. Most Muslim women I know, and I know a lot, love the fact that they have to wear what they wear. They talk about Christian women first being slaves to the fashion houses, then men want them to show off their tits when they go out, usually so they can then say, what are you looking at.

Your going to a jockeys ball, your wife comes out in a tracksuite, you say "Your joking, your not going to wear that are you."

Yeah your right, we mistreat our women better

 

OK So as usual you cannot debate without insult, I am a real piece of work, you take first prize though. 1: it's useless me telling you what I think of underage marriage, stoning, honour killings and the such as I have discussed them all time and time again for months. When I say it you say I am lying. Example. If I say something like if a man, lets say 47, marries a 13 year old girl, he is technically not a pedophile. You and your mates immediately label me a pedophile, you say I am excusing child marriage, etc. I never said anything like that, all I did was clarify a point. Just because someone breaks an egg, doesn't mean they are scrambling them, they could be baking a cake.

Honour killings, not sure if it is actually in the Koran itself, but I do know it is written in some law somewhere. It is barbaric, it wasn't always limited to Muslims and was carried out long before, probably included in religious texts because it was custom at the time, most religious texts are just customs, God doesn't really exist to have inspired them, it is something, one of thousands of things in the Islamic texts that needs revision/removing, thankfully it is not recognised by most Muslim countries and happens rarely.

 

It was you who attempted to discredit me when you referred to previous threads I posted, and when I
criticise you, you then suggest I am the one insulting you. Thats a bit hypocritical isnt it. Further to that,
I never called you a pedophile. I stated once that a court would not convict a muslim man for having
sex with his under age wife because of a lack of mens rea. You even sent me a private message thanking
me for what I had posted.
As far as honour killing are concerned, yes it is in the koran, and I find it despicable that you simply gloss
over the sadness of many muslim women who live in an abusive marriage overseas, and suffer from the
brutality of their husbands. You say that honour killings are not recognised in most muslim countries and happens rarely. Are you sure about that. Better do some more research on that old mate.
Finally, I really had to smile at you picking up on the two female sharia court judges, because really, this is
a good thing, because it means that muslim women, in their courts maybe, just maybe, will get a fair go.
I think thats called shooting yourself in the foot...or treading on your dick...
And btw, there is a female sharia court judge in the UK, but she seems to be at odds with people, because
she insists that its ok for muslim men to have several wives in the UK, and that muslims need not adhere
to UK marriage laws allowing one wife only. And to make it worse, she condones abusive marriages.
Well, I suppose just because you are a judge it doesnt mean youre a good one.
And another btw, there is a female class of sharia judges being "schooled" in India, so there will be
more female sharia court judges there. Maybe they should get some in Pakistan where honour killing
is prevalent...oh no wait...it only happens rarely....

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/18/the-female-sharia-judges-of-india.html

But even the female judges have been brainwashed as Soman states that islamic men and women are equal...not true...

https://islamqa.info/en/1105

 

http://www.therebel.media/what_they_won_t_tell_us_about_the_quebec_mosque_attack

Is there a cover up or isnt there a cover up and if so.....why...

Make up your own minds....
I wont post the comments, there are too many..read them and decide...
Well, maybe just one...

JOHN BARRON commented 1 day ago
Unfortunately this whole tragic situation seems to be a ‘set-up’ through which M-103 will be brought in to law. I know that seems far fetched, but there are too many ‘coincidences’ that can’t be discounted.

All of this started 1400 years ago with the Warlord Mohammed and it goes much deeper than religion.

Canadians had better wake up. This is the exact ploy Islam has used throughout it’s history. Muslims portrayed as the victims (I’m not referring to the unfortunate Mosque deaths) ‘Stealth Jihad’, the ‘Trojan Horse’, death of democracy and the host country’s values through the manifestation of ‘Islamophobia’ , the elimination of free speech, and the installation of Sharia Law.

Look at Europe. Look at the UK. Look at Dearbourne, Michigan. We are next!

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/erdogan-tells-off-merkel-for-using-phrase-islamist-terrorism

What a joke. Erdogan is widely known as a madman.
Islam means submission, does it not...
Mad Merkel will obviously surrender to this victimology, and become more of a dhimmi than
she is now.
If a terrorist is from Germany, France, Italy, Sweden or Austria, they would be called a
German terrorist, or a French terrorist, an Italian or a Swedish terrorist, or an Austrian terrorist.
BUT if they shout allahu akbar, and are obviously muslim because evidence uncovered exposes
them to be islamic...we cant call it islamic terrorism......what utter garbage Erdogan peddles.
The koran states "strike terror into the hearts of the infidel...."

Quotes from link:

This expression ‘Islamist terror’ seriously saddens us Muslims,” Erdogan said. “Such an expression is not correct because Islam and terror cannot be associated. The meaning of Islam is peace.”

Now if only he can convince Islamic jihad terrorists of this. They routinely associate Islam with terror, without a murmur of protest from Erdogan. Islamic spokesmen are always very concerned that non-Muslims not associate Islam with terrorism, but they never put much energy into getting Muslims to stop doing so.
“Please let’s not use it. As long as it is used we need to stand against it. As a Muslim president personally I cannot accept that,” he said.

gravenimage says
February 3, 2017 at 7:42 pm

Yes–the idea that Erdogan rejects Jihad terror is just ludicrous. He just doesn’t want it referred to as “Islamist”, lest the filthy Infidels become alarmed and start defending themselves.

Singh the Sikh says
February 3, 2017 at 4:01 pm

Senile old (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) Merkel is a pushover for Muslims. Appeasement is her game. Her cowardice has made Germany weak.

Walter Sieruk says
February 3, 2017 at 4:12 pm

That fool Merkel had not learned anything at all since that last December jihad truck attack in Berlin . Now Merkel is afraid to call it islamic terrorism what it actually is . Which is Islamic terrorism.. That’s odd because no one is afraid to call a person who engages in violence for anarchy and “anarchist terrorist”. Nor are people afraid to call a Marxist who engages in violence for the ideology of communism a “Communist terrorist.” Likewise, a person who commits violence for Environmentalism an “Environmentalist terrorists. “Nevertheless, when it comes to a Muslim terrorist who engages in deadly violence because of the theology and ideology of Islam, many people fear to call that person an “Islamic terrorists.” Strange but true.

Antivenin says
February 3, 2017 at 4:32 pm

Perfect example of taqqiya: lying to protect Islam (mandatory for Muslims)

Islam means submission (to Allah)

Allahu akhbar means Allah is the greatest (i.e. Allah is greater than your God)

Make Europe an Islam-free zone, MAKE Europe GREAT AGAIN!

End quotes.

Mad Merkel reminds me of the shell game.
Under one shell you have taqiyya, under another shell you have victimology, under another shell you
have dhimmitude...guess what, you incompetent old schmuck, you got the lot.....one only has to
look at the senile old simpleton to see that shes incompetent.

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/...or-christian-symbols-ban-after-burka-outlawed

How childish and petty is this.
If you want our veils to be removed, then we want your crosses to be removed.Hopefully Austria will
have the stomach to stand up this pedantic b!tch and not be suckered by the victimology which is
so obvious the card that they're playing.

Quote from link:

andra says
February 4, 2017 at 9:22 am

Typical Muslim. So called moderate Muslims usually claim that the full face veil is NO religious must-have in Islam but rather a cultural tradition. But as soon as we want these things removed from our public places they begin to cry. If our beloved veil has to disappear it is only fair that all crosses are removed from all the country. I really can´t stand it any more. If they want to have Islam around them they can move to 57 islamic countries. If they want to integrate into the west they should stop trying to islamize our countries.

End quote

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmQRMK3ClU8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGaO3NKJa-8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEcoyWW-H4g

Welcome to Minnesota,where sharia law is being taught in schools.

 

this is my first post so please give me some slack here

as for Islam replaced communism
at least you could safely argue against communism

I can never understand why we put religion up there in the "not to criticise category"
its an emotional issue with the all the baggage
might take another 100 years of evolution for us to regard religion as another theory , nothing special
we can criticise economic theories like communism and globalisation

if I was God I would ban religion

 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/26/canada-inching-towards-islamophobia-law/#ixzz4WwEKVjlm

Quotes from link:

Canada is inching toward a broadly-based law that would codify “Islamophobia” as a hate crime without even defining Islamophobia or demonstrating that it is a phenomenon requiring legal action.

After first passing a motion that condemns Islamophobia, last month, Iqra Khalid, a Member of Parliament (MP) from the governing Liberals, tabled Motion M-103 in the House of Commons. The motion demands that Islamophobia be treated as a crime without even bothering to define the offense.

Thomas Mulcair, the leader of the leftist New Democrat Party, read the first motion in the House of Commons:

“Mr. Speaker, in a moment I will be seeking unanimous consent for an important motion based on the e-petition sponsored by the Hon. Member for Pierrefonds–Dollard that asks that we, the House of Commons, condemn all forms of Islamophobia,” Mulcair said

.Monique Thomson-Bean • 9 days ago
To all the people shouting islamophobia.. Just wait till your wife, daughter, sister can’t walk the dog at night anymore because the chance of sexual assault is higher than not. That’s life in Europe now!!! That will be life in North America soon as it’s shown to be happening already. Then they’ll all be singing a different tune. Think your women are safe??? Not if there is one radical Moslem living in your town.

A Canadian woman living with this threat in Europe
25 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Natalie Green Monique Thomson-Bean • 9 days ago
There's been some sexual assaults already in a New Brunswick school, the latest victim was told not to worry about it, and to try to understand from his point of view, yes a Syrian refugee. It's sickening
24 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
chekme2 Natalie Green • 9 days ago
islam is actually a sick cult.
16 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Bobby Robinson chekme2 • 7 days ago
It's a bastardized ideology, forcing it's followers to follow a very misconstrued of uneducated ideas!!
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Monique Thomson-Bean Natalie Green • 9 days ago
I'm Canadian and when this (*)(*)(*)(*) started over here none of my friends and family had heard or seen anything on the news about it. It wasn't going to come to Canada.....No way ( sarc). I warned them it was only a matter of time. Trudeau opened the gates wide. I've read about all the trouble in eastern Canada and believe me it's only gonna get worse. Hopefully not as bad as here where every country is borderless and they can come and go and no one is the wiser. Worse thing you guys did was vote another Clinton in office.
6 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
LittleRoot_48 Monique Thomson-Bean • 9 days ago
Which Clinton would that be?
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Monique Thomson-Bean LittleRoot_48 • 9 days ago
You're kidding right?
2 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Mary Brumley Monique Thomson-Bean • 5 days ago
I would like to know also!
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Bobby Robinson Natalie Green • 7 days ago
If there were any others, they've been covered up by MSM by this Lieberal Government, leading us to war!!
1 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
john spielman Monique Thomson-Bean • 7 days ago
I am not nor will ever be an "islamophobe" , I am whoever an ISLAMOLOATHE- I loathe islam, it is a vile antichrist doctrine of Satan and muhammed the 'perfect man ' of islam was a demon possessed mass murderer thief liar and pedophile pervert!
6 • Reply•Share ›
Undefeated Against Democrats • 9 days ago
Under the guise of tolerance it's goal is to circumvent free speech and
introduce Sharia Law in a limited manner for the Muslim community that
ascribes to it. It was narrowly defeated the last time it was voted on
in parliament. Allowing it a foothold like in Britain is a grave error.
First it's a mosque, a neighborhood and then a suburb. Having an island
of people that are essentially under theocratic rule has no place in a
democratic country.

Since it goes without saying that in a
democratic society all religions are allowed to practice their faith
freely and that criticism whether it is warranted or not can be expected
where free speech is part of the democratic process favoring one over
all others is promoting censorship and a political agenda which I
addressed previously. And when the liberal indoctrinated free speech
police move to arrest an offender will they pursue someone with
Christian-phobia, Judaism-phobia and Buddism-phobia with the same
zealousness?

End quotes.

Interesting to see the difference between a politicians view and the views of the
people of Canadastan...obviously poles apart...

 

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/canadas-surrender-to-islamic-blasphemy-laws-on-the-glazov-gang

A must watch video...