Israel’'s minister of culture says Palestinian children should be shot

Here's another example of how the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) operate:

Iman Darweesh Al Hams (…) was a 13-year-old Palestinian girl killed by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) fire near a military observation post in a "no-man's" zone near the Philadelphi Route on 5 October 2004, in Rafah in the Gaza Strip. (…) The IDF commander of the soldiers who shot her was accused by his comrades and Palestinian witnesses of using automatic fire to deliberately shoot her repeatedly, (…) During trial, he expressed no regret over his actions and said he would have done the same even if the girl was a 3-year-old.[2] (…) The commander was charged with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and perverting the course of justice by an Israeli military court but was found not guilty.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iman_Darweesh_Al_Hams

But I'm sure that the hasbara activists could find six million ways to explain away this crime.

 

which was?

 

They did not "trashed". Israel provided the oppurtunity for the Arabs that left n the 1948 war, to retrieve heir lands ot them, but the Arabs simpl did not do it. As the Israeli laws regarding the lands of the Arabs after the war stated:

Which means, by that section, the Arab owners of a land that they lost are entitled to compensation which shell be given in money that will be fixed by agreement between the Development Authority and the owners. The Arab owners did not sit withthe Development Authority to agree on the amount of the compensatiton.
Furthermore it states:

Which means that in case of land that was used for agriculture and was the main source of livelihood of its Arab owner the Development Authority will offer him an other property, either for ownership or lease. That will be after the Arab owner will demend it from the Development Authority. Such of demend did not happend.

Source: http://www.israellawresourcecenter.org/israellaws/fulltext/landacquisitionlaw.htm

As I showed you earlier, there is the father of the Genetic Anthropoligy that did a research on it and concluded that "race" does not exist. please re-read comment #20.

You wrote in comment #10 the following:

Hence you said that he couldnt throw a stone because of the hurt he feels that comes from the hand with the sling.

From one of the OP sources, it claims:

Which means that the soldier tried to detain the child for stone throwing and not to kidnap the child, as the OP tried to claim in the thread itself in it's opaning sentence.

The OP quotes the OPINION of the IDF, as I said. And the word of the IDF is a joke.

They detain the child for several of days and then release them.

You are now saying that the Arabs are been judged in courts, while several comments earlier you stated that the Arabs do not judged in courts. Please stop contradicting yourself.

I just replied to it, but I guess you done really care, as you put it in comment #16.

 

race, as in the "black" race, the "white" race, the "yellow" race, is socially constructed trash.

if there are any TRUE races, they are based on genetic haplotypes, meaning there are maybe 100 races or more.

the concept of race, seperated by clear and pronounced phenotypical characteristics, is simply the product of Eurocentric bigots who wanted to classify humans into convenient little categories.

 

In the British newspaper The Guardian we get another example of how Israeli "soldiers" operate:

Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, 9, as a human shield avoid jail

We need people like these in the military," Katz said. (…) The ruling was welcomed by Israeli politician Otniel Schneller. "The judges showed the appropriate level of balance between meticulously following IDF orders and Jewish moral values and the responsibility for maintaining the initiative and decisiveness of IDF soldiers when in battle," he told Ynet.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/21/israeli-soldiers-human-shield-avoid-jail

 

I am not interested in your pseudo-science, that is just a word for... not science at all.
I'll be sticking to what is says in the dictionary.

- - - Updated - - -

Makes perfect sense a Jew is able to use a Palestinian child as a human shield, in order to racially oppress Palestinians.
It fits the apartheid rule of Israel.

 

Here's another example of how Israeli "soldiers" operate:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2009/04/tropas-israelies-revelan-abusos-gaza-20090401/

But I guess the folks at Amnesty International are also "antisemites", huh?

 

Jewish terrorists who attack and murder Palestinians have the tacit support of the Israeli authorities:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_settler_violence

Absolutely disgraceful.

 

This clown's mask looks like it belongs in one of those sadomasochistic pornographic movies that his fellow tribesmen produce in the US.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...forces-caught-using-boy-as-shield-561052.html

Yes, this is an old article (from 2004) but Israel's vile behavior hasn't changed.

 

Pallywood at its finest. Gather women and children, make sure someone takes video and get your little boy to throw rocks at armed soldiers. They were hoping for bloody footage to use for global sympathy, followed by a big payout for the family, but only got an example of exemplary restraint in spite of being bitten and attacked. In this case, the boy got an award from Turkey, a great example of humanity in the region. They haven't had a massacre in several months!

 

I love your attempt to insult by admitting to watch sadomasochistic pornographic movies!!!

 

Is Amnesty International also "Pallywood":

http://archive.is/hsq9M

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2009/04/tropas-israelies-revelan-abusos-gaza-20090401/

http://www.kawther.info/K20040513A.html

Nice try, dude, but black sadomasochistic leather/latex masks are so common in pop culture that you don’t actually have to watch pornographic movies to know about them. Still, I believe that defending war crimes and human rights violations is worse than watching porn, and I think that most normal people would agree with me.

 

Jewish propaganda at it's finest.
How about that ethnic cleansing Jew just stick to his side of the border instead of violently oppressing children in the WB?

 

Normal people do not send their children to throw rocks at armed soldiers. This video does not show a war crime; is shows extreme restraint on the part of a soldier in spite of being attacked. The video clearly starts and stops at times to show the soldier in the worst possible light and I am not falling for it. As far as the other videos you watch, I am not judging.

Oh, is that video Jewish propaganda? I didn't know. They could have done better.

 

Normal people don't shoot innocent women and children who pose no threat to their lives. Normal people don't fire white phosphorus indiscriminately over densely populated residential areas (which is a war crime, by the way). Normal people don't use children as human shields. Normal people don't break into other people's homes and defecate on the tables, and wipe their behinds with the clothes that they find in the wardrobes. Yet Israeli "soldiers" do all this and much, much more. And you defend them.

Yeah, that's the ticket, buddy. Keep making lame jokes about how I (allegedly) watch pornography, and ignore all the articles about Israel's human rights violations that I've posted in this thread.