Jack has had enough.

And you Should quit relying on the alphabet soup media and lawfare.blog for yours.

 

Well I guess we don't have to concern ourselves over Jack Smith anymore.

Huzzah!

 

I’m not. I rely on my own judgment and knowledge.

 

AS do I.

 

Now Smith will have the opportunity on appeal not only to have her ruling reversed but at long last have her removed from the case.

 

But she successfully debuted with the Orange Rectum for a higher court. By pissing on the rule of law and her oath of office.

 

No he won't. Not unless there's some kind of error in her reasoning.

Which I've heard, there isn't.

 

There are tons of errors. Every time this scenario has been in the courts before, EVERY. TIME., this argument has lost. Including in the Supreme Court. She's either an incompetent, corrupt, or both.

 

LOL! You "heard" that? Who said that?

 

He doesn't need to remove her from the case, though. She's already off of the case. Either it gets appealed to a higher court or gets re-introduced with a Fed prosecutor, which means there would be a new judge anyway. She's out of the fight.

 

But, no chance of evidenciary hearings, appeal rulings nor justice for this year.. justice delayed, justice denied. Misson accomplished, well coordinated with the Trump team and some SCOTUS. We have witnessed corruption right in your face...and we have to currently take it.

 

Oh, absolutely. That was always the ploy. Delay. Defer. Do everything possible to make sure the rule of law just doesn't happen for as long as possible. I don't see how she gets out of this without more sanctions, but I'm not sure if she cares.

 

Every time Chevron ever came up before the Courts in the last 40 years, the argument lost.

Until a couple weeks ago anyways.

 

You are shifting the goalposts. But at least you now understand that the flaws in her argument are obvious unless all previous precedence is overturned.

 

Why do you care? You sound pretty certain.

Me? I'm not worried at all.

 

You're a Constitutional scholar, eh?

Well, I guess we'll see.

 

No. But the judges who have tried this in the past (which you are incapable of talking about or even thinking of . . . even when it comes to the Supreme Court) are. I'm sorry you are so mad that precedence says your favorite Trump lackey is an ignorant piece of ****.

 

I guess that you were ************ about this "I heard" nonsense.....

And I am pretty certain about the outcome.

 

Good luck.

 

“I heard” that Smith’s chances on appeal were great.

Good luck to us all. The rule of law is too important to be left to the whims of a deliberately **** application of the law.

 

How does the childish name calling help your cause?

 

Lying Jack Smith Isn’t a Special Counsel ‘by Law’

Federal prosecutors must be duly appointed and confirmed by the Senate. He fails both tests.



'there is no legal authority for the creation of the office of special counsel, he wasn’t appointed in compliance with the Constitution', and his funding source is unconstitutional.

We Threw Off The Monarchy.

'The Constitution’s Appointments Clause limits how executive offices can be created and how they may be filled. Before the Revolution, the king could both create and fill offices. The Constitution eliminated that power by giving Congress the authority to create offices or to authorize their creation in specific instances, and requiring the advice and consent of the Senate before the president could fill certain offices. It empowers the president to nominate and appoint “officers of the United States” not specifically provided for in the Constitution only with the advice and consent of the Senate, and only to offices “which shall be established by Law.” The Appointments Clause does allow for the appointment of officers by the president, a court or the head of a department—such as the attorney general—but, again, only when such appointment is permitted “by Law.”'

'Authority for appointment of the current special counsel doesn’t exist “by Law,”'

'if “Congress has not reached a consensus that a particular office should exist, the Executive”—in the person of the attorney general—“lacks the power to create and fill an office of his own accord,”'

'If Congress had wished to allow the attorney general to create an office of special prosecutor, it would have done so with a statute as simple and direct as those that give the power to create offices to other cabinet secretaries—including the secretaries of transportation, agriculture, health and human services and education.'

Congress never authorized the AG to create the office of Special Counsel.

Lying Jack Is FIRED!

https://archive.ph/bkdPM#selection-6013.0-6013.328

 

Lying Jack Smith's out of a job.

Biden-Harris DoJ Reportedly Winding Down Trump Criminal Cases

"The American people defeated Jack Smith at the ballot box."

As Jonathan Turley notes, Donald Trump’s victory was the largest jury verdict that some of us anticipated for years of unrelenting weaponization of the legal system.

''Smith’s prosecutions ended with the 270th Electoral College vote secured around 2 a.m. Wednesday. His unrelenting efforts to convict Trump and then, when prevented from holding a trial, to release damaging material before the election have collapsed with the blue wall in the Midwest.'

'Trump has said he plans to fire Smith on Day 1. That means the end of both the January 6 and the classified documents cases.'

'That leaves James and Bragg as residue of long-forgotten lawfare battles, but even there Trump’s prospects look good.'

'James was able to secure a fellow lawfare warrior in Justice Arthur Engoron, who imposed a grotesque $455 million in fines and interest.'

Lying Jack will be slinking off before Trump fires his corrupt ass.

Good Judge Cannon will continue handing down carefully reasoned decisions.

 

Millions of dollars pissed away by the worst administration in history (on top of the Ukraine money pit and all the other issues

 

Maybe John Durham will be back to prosecute Jack Smith and several others he wasn't allowed to fully investigate for their coup against a sitting President.

https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1658196453573926953