Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Golem, Jun 28, 2022.
Are you going to share with us how you learned that?
They promptly and immediately offered it on hearing Amber Heard II's testimony. Now we'll see is crazy eyed Schiff, Old washed up hag Nancy and Traitor Liz, have the BALLS to put them on the stand.
RE!!! You were in the limo?
What news channel were you listening to, or did they drop by and tell you personally?
J6! committee credibility exploded!
Breaking Explosive Photographic Evidence Of Trump Lunging For The Steering Wheel!
Try to imagine a judicial system where the prosecutor gets to decide who the accused is allowed to select for a defense lawyer.
If that's where you want to put your opinion you'll get no argument from me.
Try to imagine an investigation where the investigators give a phuk.
Whenever someone uses words like "everything" or "always" the only conclusion I can come to is that they are full of **** and what they say is not worth considering.
How about this: tRaitor tRump lied over 30K times in his four years in office playing golf.
Whatever floats your boat.
Having a pathological liar for President isn't it. But yours seems to be riding high in the water of tRaitor tRumps lies.
I especially enjoyed the Loser trying to claim that he "hardly knows" Hutchinson after her proximity to Trump in the West Wing was shown.
“Anyone downplaying Cassidy Hutchinson’s role or her access in the West Wing either doesn’t understand how the Trump [White House] worked or is attempting to discredit her because they’re scared of how damning this testimony is,” former White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews tweeted.
Try to imagine a bipartisan Congressional investigative committee in which nearly all the witnesses testifying under oath are Republicans.
Could that be because Pelosi wouldn't allow Republicans to freely choose who to sit on the Committee?
That's as wild as pretending a "Landslide!" was mysteriously stolen with no suspects or credible evidence that could hold up in any legal venue over a year-and-a-half later.
It could certainly be because Republicans sabotaged the bipartisan independent commission they had initially supported.
As it is, the disgruntled seem unable to discredit the substantive sworn testimonies of all those Republican witnesses.
I'll wait for the actual crimes to be reported and charged. This sham is just a distraction for the failures of the Democratic Party.
I understand that you are upset that so many Republicans of integrity have provided sworn testimony, the substance of which has not been refuted, but that is the consequence of rejecting the proposed independent, bipartisan commission that would have allowed them to be harassed and diversions contrived.
The scheme could not just be swept under the rug after the Trump goons attacked Congress.
"We cannot just sweep this under the rug. We need to know why it happened,
who did it, and people need to be held accountable for it.
And I'm committed to make sure that happens!"
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy
Good! 4 diversions from the subject in 1 sigle post!
It's this: "These Dems are animated by a deep thirst for revenge and incapable of a fair-minded inquiry as this demonstrates" that I POSTED that explains what they are avoiding dealing with, while their star witness blew up their credibility as a fair-minded finder of fact.
When?.... Who says he is going to trial?....
Pelosi pulled the second and third hand testimony before in the impeachment ... She also tried no cross-examination before also in the star chamber...
FOX News: Secret Service Prepared To Refute Cassidy Hutchinson's Claim That Trump Lunged At Wheel, Assaulted Them
And your silly Trump lunged garbage is being challenged by someone actually there.... not some 2nd and third hand testimony by some low level aide that was not there..
Did your guy testify under oath?
Who finds that? Trump?
Separate names with a comma.