January 6 Hearing Session 6: "They're not here to hurt ME"

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Golem, Jun 28, 2022.

  1. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cross-examination would bring out the truth on each and all the witnesses... Without cross-examination the truth is in question and just more tax payer money flushed down the toilet when the testimonies are found to be flawed.
     
  2. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Eric Herschmann does not have to testify...Cross-examining Cassidy Hutchinson would have brought that fact out...
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2022
  3. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    33,107
    Likes Received:
    13,753
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly! And if you're going to commit perjury, you don't give that level of details, nor do you describe facts that the DoJ can verify by simply calling any of the many witnesses that were present.
     
    Rampart and MJ Davies like this.
  4. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    22,422
    Likes Received:
    8,968
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The whole nation, if they have been watching.
     
  5. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    22,422
    Likes Received:
    8,968
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    According to the Secret Service, the committee did not even bother to ask them.
     
  6. Doofenshmirtz

    Doofenshmirtz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    22,743
    Likes Received:
    15,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If were not careful, next time there will be 2 guys wearing fuzzy hats and someone will bring a golf club! Our government can't oppose such an "insurrection"!!!

    I see this as a last ditch effort to keep him from running again. Its not like dems can run on their accomplishments!
     
  7. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    33,107
    Likes Received:
    13,753
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The complete quote was “I don’t f---ing care that they have weapons. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the f---ing mags away.”

    So when he told armed insurrectionists to march to the Capitol, he knew who they WERE going to hurt. That's why he didn't want their weapons confiscated.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2022
    Rampart and MJ Davies like this.
  8. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    62,798
    Likes Received:
    41,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Committee took his sworn deposition, to this very fact, before they put this poor girl on the stand in front of a national television audience.
     
  9. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    22,422
    Likes Received:
    8,968
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There appears to be some question whether that conversation took place according to the Secret Service.
     
    Zorro likes this.
  10. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    62,798
    Likes Received:
    41,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are starting with the presumption that it's not possible that she thought what she was saying was true, even if it wasn't. That's not necessarily a valid assumption. She very well could have believed every word she said was true, and every word could be false. That's why a responsible committee would have corroborated her claims against first person testimony and physical evidence.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2022
  11. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    37,624
    Likes Received:
    12,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Demonizing Pelosi does nothing to refute the sworn testimonies of all the Republican witnesses.

    The substance of their accounts has yet to be refuted, under oath, by anyone.

    At the basis of the scam is the Loser's lie that he had a "Landslide!" stolen. As his Attorney General and others repeatedly informed him, that is "bullshit."
     
    Rampart and MJ Davies like this.
  12. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She was not in the car.... it is called 2nd hand testimony at best..

    She lied...and Trump was not in "the beast" that Hutchinson claims... he left in the "Camp David Packard SUV"

    from a former secret service agent who protected Obama...

    ff 15:00 plus

    https://rumble.com/v1afzv3-the-trum...that-wasnt-ep.-1800-the-dan-bongino-show.html

    upload_2022-6-29_19-25-1.png
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2022
  13. freedom8

    freedom8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Messages:
    1,684
    Likes Received:
    992
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They testified under oath. Do you know what it means?
     
  14. freedom8

    freedom8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Messages:
    1,684
    Likes Received:
    992
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She told what the secret service guys told her. She never said she was there.

    Did the secret service agents testify under oath?
     
  15. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pelosi was directly involved with this sham 3rd impeachment... she has her dirty little fingers all over it and she will never be held accountable because she helped write the laws that make Congress and her records exempt from any FOIA requests...2022 and that all turns around..
     
  16. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It means they can leave out the exculpatory substances without repercussion..

    It also means they can lie directly to Congress and not be held accountable..
    Example.... Adam Schiff reading a made up Zelensky call and also lied about what the Jordan texts said... was he held accountable for lying to Congress... nope...
     
  17. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would he testify? ..... when the obvious answer would to be to cross-examine the witness saying it...
     
  18. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    62,798
    Likes Received:
    41,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The OP's witness exploded and with it the credibility of the J6 Dog and Pony Show.

    Adam Schiff Hardest Hit as Bad News for Capitol Riot-Obsessed Dems Gets Even Worse:

    [​IMG]
    "Fresh polling out on both the sham ongoing Capitol riot “investigation” and also on what direction a majority of Americans feel America is headed provides further evidence that Democrats are likely to face a red tsunami in November."

    LEAST IMPORTANT - J6

    [​IMG]
    MOST IMPORTANT - INFLATION

    "The latest AP-NORC poll shows that an “overwhelming and growing majority” of people believe the nation is on the wrong track. That includes a whopping 78% of Democrats:"

    [​IMG]

    "Democrats utterly embarrassed themselves by showcasing the supposed “bombshell” testimony of a “witness” who actually hadn’t witnessed anything at all, and key parts from her third-hand story are about to get debunked by Secret Service agents."

    Voters have been sending a crystal clear, unresponded to message to Democrats: #JUSTSHUTUPANDFIXINFLATION
     
  19. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    37,624
    Likes Received:
    12,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rampart likes this.
  20. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    62,798
    Likes Received:
    41,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
  21. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    37,624
    Likes Received:
    12,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump's habitual modus operandi, rather than testify under oath in a legal venue, is to spew his vapid bluster via entertainment media where he can avoid perjury charges.

    As he and his lickspittles try pulling this scam yet again, training his weird worshipers to parrot his bombast, the consistent, polite, proper response is to cordially invite him and them to repeat their ravings in a legal venue, under oath.

    I hope Attorney General Garland consistently emphasizes the distinction. He'll be the target of vilification and vendetta, of course, but that comes with the territory.
     
    Rampart likes this.
  22. Gateman_Wen

    Gateman_Wen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then you boys better get to testifying.
     
  23. Gateman_Wen

    Gateman_Wen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This isn't a court. That will come later.
     
  24. Gateman_Wen

    Gateman_Wen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The questioning was done mostly by your "side". What more do you want?
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2022
  25. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    37,624
    Likes Received:
    12,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cassidy Hutchinson testified, quite clearly, that she had not personally witnessed it, but she had been told that by then-White House deputy chief of staff Tony Ornato.

    Mr Ornato has yet to testify whether he told her that, who told him, or whether he had witnessed it firsthand.

    Should Meadows, Cipollone and others testify under oath to corroborate or contest her sworn testimony? Obviously.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2022

Share This Page