Jaw dropping- New 9/11 footage destroys main stream narrative

Discussion in '9/11' started by Flare, Sep 13, 2016.

  1. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,017
    Likes Received:
    2,151
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When will you show some evidence?

    - - - Updated - - -

    There is no evidence that the video you refer to were israelis or were involved in the attacks

    - - - Updated - - -

    There has never been any evidence of any of these claims
     
  2. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    14,188
    Likes Received:
    4,266
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just eyewitnesses and police reports. Get a grip you whacky knucklehead.
     
  3. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    14,188
    Likes Received:
    4,266
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look up Dominick Suter. What the hell is up with that guy?
     
  4. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And traitors and terrorists.
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For you? No, no, no, no, no and never. When will you ever post anything that means anything to anyone? Don't bother, it's a rhetorical question, you don't know how, that's obvious.
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,017
    Likes Received:
    2,151
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong there are no such police reports and eyewitnesses mean nothing

    - - - Updated - - -

    In other words you have no evidence for me or anyone else.

    In all of your posts on every thread you have only made baseless assertions without one shred of supporting evidence
     
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like I said it was rhetorical, it really wasn't necessary for you to validate my point.
     
  8. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    14,188
    Likes Received:
    4,266
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong again champ. Five Israelis were arrested in a white van after the police recieved a report that these men were cheering as the WTC buildings collapsed. They were also reportedly filming the event. When the New Jersey State Police stopped the van there were five Israelis in it. They found wads of cash stuffed in the sock of one of the guys, box cutters and the police dog hit on the van for traces of explosives. It was later found that two of those arrested were Mossad agents. The next day FBI agents went to the place that the Van was registered to and spoke to the owner, Dominick Suter who was doing bussiness as Urban Moving Services. They asked about these employees and Suter said he knew nothing about them. The next day the FBI came to follow up with Suter at Urban Moving But Suter had bolted to Israel abandoning his entire bussiness and leaving his customers in a lurch. This Urban Moving a service was evidently a Mossad front and Suter's behavior was very suspicious to say the least. Also, you can tell the thousands of prisoners around the world, some on death row that "eyewitnesses mean nothing". I am sure that they would be glad to learn that you dingbat. Now get a grip you wacky ding a ling.
     
  9. MVictorP

    MVictorP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2014
    Messages:
    7,666
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's orders and job contracts that can effectively muzzle one from being a whistleblower. No organisation, be it volunteers, likes whistleblowers, and they continue, in many cases, they attack them even when their whistle blow was saluted by all, resulting in emprisonment or even death. Just look at Assange.

    Rejection by co-workers and general opprobe is also an efficient deterrant. Most organizations do know to which point they can trust an employee with "sensitive" informations, and these ones get deployed at the right places. A singing bird will never be in function anywhere near the organization's dirty laundry pile.

    There was a thread somewhere deep in this board that had a title like "Most Cops Are In Fact Criminals", that was based on the fact that many cops saw partners do something not entirely right and kept it quiet, making them accomplices for that crime.
     
  10. Ddyad

    Ddyad Advisor Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    29,962
    Likes Received:
    10,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cops are like soldiers. There is an old Highlander saying "Friends are good -- in war". Common bureaucrats are not combatants. Most will not blwo the whistle so long as there are not compelled to expose themselves to a felony prosecution - especially one for conspiracy to commit 1st degree murder.

    Clerks are very dedicated to covering their own butts.
     
  11. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,529
    Likes Received:
    2,306
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you know what a conspiracy of silence is?
     
  12. Ddyad

    Ddyad Advisor Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    29,962
    Likes Received:
    10,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure. That can work - unless it involves common bureaucrats conspiring to commit serious crimes like mass murder.

    Very protected ordinary federal civil servants are not at all shy about giving the their bosses the finger, and they are not easily fired or punished.
     
  13. phoenyx

    phoenyx New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I didn't refer to any video in this thread.
     
  14. phoenyx

    phoenyx New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Domick Suter, the man who owned Urban Moving Systems, is certainly a person of interest in any serious 9/11 investigation. 9/11 Research Wikia has an entry on his former company:
    http://911research.wikia.com/wiki/Urban_Moving_Systems

    He fled shortly after he was initially questioned in the U.S. shortly after 9/11, avoiding the fate of his workers who were detained and allegedly tortured for a time, but has apparently come back to the U.S. now that things have cooled off for him...
    http://mybigfatanti-zionistlife.blogspot.ca/2009/10/suters-back-in-town-9-11-dancing.html
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,017
    Likes Received:
    2,151
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong and proven wrong sport.

    There were no arrests made period nor could there be. It is not illegal to cheer and there are no police reports proving any of the crap you just lied about.

    The whole thing is manufactured fantasy which is why you cannot back it or any of your other idiotic claims up with any evidence

    - - - Updated - - -

    There is no evidence of the " dancing israelis "

    Video or otherwise
     
  16. One Mind

    One Mind Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Messages:
    16,858
    Likes Received:
    5,809
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, and fashion yourself a tinfoil cowboy hat, and then look up the Gulf of Tonkin conspiracy and Northwoods for a start.

    I am not saying 911 was in part an inside job, but given what we know about the G of T conspiracy and the Northwoods plan, which was axed by JFK, to think that gov't is incapable of inducing, or aiding a conspiracy as a reason to go to war is being gullible in a very infantile manner. Now, G of T was a conspiracy, a false flag, that to us fully committed to Vietnam, and those sailors on that ship never let the secret out. So to think that a secret cannot be kept for a long time is just absurd. It was decades before we found out the truth of that false flag.

    There is a possibility that a few people in gov't knew of the 911 attack before it happened. They may have known an attack by aircraft was coming. And allowed it to happen. For by the time just the invasion of Iraq is paid for, it will reportedly cost 7 trillion bucks. With much of that ending up in the pockets of our war industries and their owners. And afterall, the takedown of Iraq was on that neocon new American century list of nations to take out. The dots are there, to be connected, but that does not mean there was a conspiracy, but to say it is impossible is just silly.
     
  17. phoenyx

    phoenyx New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  18. phoenyx

    phoenyx New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not only is it a known fact that arrests were made, it would appear there were -2- vans of Israelis that were stopped:
    **It was reported the van contained tonnes of explosives (14).

    What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (15), the New York Post (16), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (17) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

    But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (18), and Yediot America, (19) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

    It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

    Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.

    From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks...
    **

    Source: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html
     
  19. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not a "possibility", it's a fact backed by overwhelming evidence.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0

    9/11 Family Member Patty Casazza: Government Knew Exact Date and Exact Targets

    http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/11/911-family-member-patty-casazza.html

    [video=youtube;rukxI_GLc3w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rukxI_GLc3w&feature=youtu.be[/video]

    Of course it does. 9/11 was a conspiracy by the highest elements within the US government, whether one believes these criminals actively participated in the planning and execution of that terrorist act or not. Complicity is the same as having actively participated because it is passive participation in the crime.
     
  20. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    14,188
    Likes Received:
    4,266
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As always, you are a flat out liar. Thanks for exposing this once again.
     
  21. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    31,422
    Likes Received:
    33,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    implosion was definitely the cause of Tower 7 as it had not been struck by an airplane or missle
     
  22. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    454
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    can you cite the official reason why that tower fell?
     
  23. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "World Trade Center 7 collapsed because of fires" - Shyam Sunder, NIST lead engineer and spokesman.

    [video=youtube;PK_iBYSqEsc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc[/video]

    It's as official as there is.
     
  24. danielpalos

    danielpalos Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,110
    Likes Received:
    454
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    thank you. seems like heat and stress caused the "implosion".
     
  25. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,017
    Likes Received:
    2,151
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No the lies are coming from you.

    Where is the evidence to support your claims?

    Saying there are police reports means nothing unless you can show them

    - - - Updated - - -

    No there is not.

    He link merely repeats the story with no evidence.
     

Share This Page