Joaquin Castro Shares Names and Employers of Trump Donors in His San Antonio District

You have not read many federal criminal statutes have you?

 

Lmao what does the words on the page say?

You must be getting dizzy by now

Here's what will do then from now on no one will be outraged when someones name and place of business is put on Twitter left or right

 

It's not anyone's civic duty to lose money.

 

I find nothing funny about what he did. Surprisingly, I am not at all surprised that you do.

 

They publish all donors.

 

Is giving out someone’s cell phone number illegal?

 

Would you say a persons name with the city they live in and their place of business is identifying information?

 

Except for the miss Michigan pageant right?

 

I think he wishes to make excuses for this behavior by a top dem.

And also to distract from that subject.

 

Yes which is why it’s required to donate to a campaign.

 

Yes, Castro was wrong, and his actions seem to be a prima facie violation of federal law.
Castro must have talked to a lawyer.

“Cyberstalking

The US Attorney’s Office (USAO) released a report in 2016 which stated that, “under the federal cyberstalking statute, ‘cyberstalking’ includes any course of conduct or series of acts taken by the perpetrator on the Internet that place the victim in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury, or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to the victim or the victim’s immediate family. 18 U.S.C. § 2261A (2015). However, there are a number of federal statutes that may apply in cyberstalking situations.”

The DOJ’s Office of Victims of Crime cites the following common elements of cyberstalking:

• Repeated, unwanted, intrusive, and frightening communications from the perpetrator by phone, mail, and/or email
• Making direct or indirect threats to harm the victim, the victim’s children, relatives, friends, or pets
• Harassing the victim through the Internet
• Posting information or spreading rumors about the victim on the Internet
• Obtaining personal information about the victim by accessing public records, using Internet search services, hiring private investigators, searching through the victim’s garbage, following the victim around the internet and contacting the victim’s friends, family, co-workers, neighbors, etc.”SECURITY AFFAIRS, Trolling, Doxing & Cyberstalking: Cybercrime & The Law, By Pierluigi Paganini, March 3, 2017.

https://securityaffairs.co/wordpres...ling-doxing-cyberstalking-cybercrime-law.html

 

I love Wikileaks!

Righties more worried about public donor info than illegal hacked private emails

 

Then it would probably be difficult to prove that it was done to encourage attacks on specific targeted donors. Nevertheless, some of these federal statutes are designed to make it very easy to win a conviction.

 

Lucky for him the president filled the DOJ and fbi with morons lol

 

Where is Julian Assange, and is he a "right winger"?

 

Hes been arrested for doxxing lol

 

By now everyone knows that the DOJ/FBI was well staffed with morons long before he was elected.

 

That should be very reassuring for Cong. Castro.

 

So then per the definition of doxxing that's what Castro did...

If those people were to be harmed I'd say Castro might be facing atleast a civil suit

 

Should we no longer track who donates to campaigns?

 

Castro better hope nothing happens to those people if that info is correct

 

Based on your "logic," the phone book is doxing. It isn't. Not if we try logic for a change. No private information was communicated. At all. It was all public information.

 

Did he release everyone how donated to all political campaigns or just his political opposition?

 

There was no public outcry; no lost money. The pageant management decided to discriminate against the winner.

 

Ya your wrong period