Judge claims 10 year old consented to gay rape by migrant. Overturns conviction

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by guavaball, Oct 25, 2016.

  1. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One of the of the biggest lies from the LGBT community was that despite ZERO wording in the argument for gay marriage addressing age of consent we should never worry that children would never be held for groups like NAMBLA because children cannot consent.

    Now we have a second case out of Europe (the first was in Italy) where a judge in this case overturned a rape conviction of a 10 year old boy by an immigrant because the judge couldn't figure out if the 10 year old consented to being raped by the adult.

    And since the gay marriage movement began in Europe how long will it be before one of these sick freak judges draw the same conclusion here?

    And I checked gay advocate websites in Europe and could not find a single one condemning the ruling. Nor any in America either What a shocker.

    This along with Lena Dunham, Harvey Milk and the multiple child male actors like Cory Haim reporting rape by male adults in the entertainment industry prove once again the LGBT community has no commitment to protecting children from child rapists and predators because their community not only condones it they celebrate those who commit the act and fail to condemn when its revealed.

    And before the LGBT defenders come to Austria's defense , age of consent is 14. Certainly didn't protect this child did it?

    An Austrian judge overturned the conviction of an Iraqi refugee who raped a 10-year-old boy at a pool, suggesting the man was unsure if the boy had consented or not.
    The 20-year-old Iraqi refugee, identified as Amir A. in court documents, came to Austria via the Balkans in 2015. He was taken to the Theresienbad pool in Vienna in December, 2015 as part of program to integrate refugees into Austrian society.
    Once at the pool, Amir dragged the boy, identified only as “Goran,” into the changing rooms, locked the door and sexually assaulted him.
    After Amir returned to the pool, the boy reported the incident to a lifeguard and the police were called; Amir was arrested at the scene.
    Amir confessed to the sexual assault, claiming he acted because of a “sexual emergency” as he had not had sex for four months.
    Despite being sentenced in June to six years in prison for rape and aggravated sexual abuse of a minor, the Austrian Supreme Court has overturned the conviction after arguing the lower court did not prove Amir knew the child had not consented.
    “This intention was not sufficiently established, so the Supreme Court quashed the rape conviction,” Austria’s national ORF reported.


    http://www.infowars.com/iraqi-refug...tion-overturned-after-claiming-boy-consented/
     
  2. GeddonM3

    GeddonM3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Messages:
    20,180
    Likes Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Well already had something like that in California , the guy didn't get off free like in Europe but he apparently had connections and only got 10 years probation for kidnap and rape of a 10 year old boy. Or I think he was 10.

    Also back in the 70's a rapist represented by Hillary had a very lenient sentence after he raped a -2 year old girl.

    And wasn't there another judge somewhere that had stepped down after a horrible sentencing on another child rapist recently?

    NAMBLA gonna make their push soon, and the democrats will be holding their hands every step of the way.
     
  3. RonnieFan

    RonnieFan Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    Messages:
    2,502
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    48
    F*cked up.

    What is wrong with today's so-called modern world?

    One thing for sure, another sign that Western Europe and the American Left have placed 'the poor Muslims' another step up on their pedestals.
     
  4. supaskip

    supaskip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Aside from the judge being a tool and not recognizing statutory rape, if nothing else [assuming that exists there], I don't see what that has to do with LGBT etc
     
  5. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe I've made that clear. The LGBT community refused to address consent in any argument on gay marriage, celebrates and even honors gays either admitted or witnessed to molesting underage children and refuses to condemn rulings like this.
     
  6. supaskip

    supaskip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    But the ruling wasn't made because there was anything gay involved; if it were a 10 year old girl I would assume that the judge would have followed the same logic.
     
  7. 9royhobbs

    9royhobbs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    7,752
    Likes Received:
    2,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's your point?

    "Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp said that while the verdict was “watertight” with regard to the serious sexual abuse of a juvenile, the written verdict on the second indictment, rape, cannot be sufficiently proved.

    The 20-year-old is expected to remain in custody until the second trial takes place, when a new sentence will be imposed.

    It is believed the new legal process will take place in 2017."

    http://nypost.com/2016/10/24/migran...turned-after-court-cant-prove-victim-said-no/

    The guy is still in jail and will remain there.
     
  8. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    22,598
    Likes Received:
    13,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Same sex marriage did not have anything to do with age of consent - it only removed the gender limitations. Also I'm not seeing how this has anything to do with gay people, these types of events are occurring to adult females (rape of a man is considered a sin) and to girls and boys everywhere the "migrants" are allowed to reside.

    They do not even view the action as "gay" as child rape is completely normal in their culture - as long as it's not with a mature male you are within the confines of their f'ed up beliefs.

    Good try trying to pull gay people into this though, religion is more culpable than orientation here.
     
  9. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its the very argument that consent will never be an issue after opening marriage up made by the LGBT community which is the point.

    - - - Updated - - -

    You just quoted it.

    Until he's released per the judge's ruling over overturning the conviction which should have never been overturned in the first place.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Wrong. The wording of the argument for gay marriage was very specific to exclude age of consent.

    Its who the LGBT community celebrates as their leaders who molest and rape underage children that goes to the argument that they do not care about age of consent.

    I could care less how the POS viewed it. Its a homoseuxal act on a 10 year old child.
     
  10. 9royhobbs

    9royhobbs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    7,752
    Likes Received:
    2,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You don't know what you're talking about.
    He's in jail and will stay in jail.
    There is no connecting dots to gay marriage.
     
  11. CJtheModerate

    CJtheModerate New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,846
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This migrant was charged with two crimes: rape and aggravated sexual abuse of a minor. The sexual abuse conviction is watertight and was not overturned, but the rape conviction was overturned because, under Austrian law, it must be proven that the rapist understood that the victim was not consenting, and the prosecution did not prove that.

    Source
     
  12. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    104,848
    Likes Received:
    37,842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    glad I live in the USA....
     
  13. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    25,320
    Likes Received:
    6,564
    Trophy Points:
    113
    fyi, the op has an infowars source
     
  14. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    22,598
    Likes Received:
    13,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This case has nothing to do with marriage, it involves child rape. That you can not decipher between the two is alarming.

    Age of consent was not mentioned because it was not being altered.

    False

    Most human sexuality experts (I'm sure your experience with child rape is vastly superior) do classify child rape as homosexual as heterosexual. That said all child rapists should be executed on the spot with a single shotgun slug to save on expenses. Why do you only care about children when it is something you can warp to attack gay people?
     
  15. supaskip

    supaskip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't see how. There are laws to protect minors, and that's regardless of sexual orientation. I see no correlation between those laws being changed and LGBT issues.
     

Share This Page