Kavanaugh, Ford set to testify in Senate Judiciary Committee hearing

Could any democrat on this forum give me a good reason why DIFI would not have used the information that she had since july for private investigation? Is there any reason other than trying to delay the vote to have held the information?

 

Under penalty of felony.

 

And you know it was a lie how? I imagine it was a calculated decision to not watch Ford's testimony as it would be tempting to attack Ford's testimony and he was wisely advised to stay far away from that.

 

It can take place but it usually doesn't and when it does it is generally not all girls. Just because she went to parties does not by any means imply that she took place in the events you suggested. That is an accusation you can't back up at a;; and you should never be making.

 

I was referring to the accusations that were lamely brought in after the Ford accusation. I think it's possible that some event happened to Ford but I highly doubt Kavanaugh had anything to do with it. I would like to see the shrink notes where this came up or if his name was filled in later.

 

That doesn't make any rational sense. Perhaps you could clarify. Do you feel the same way about those threatening Kavanaugh and his family as you do about those threatening Ford? I certainly do.

 

Not watching the Ford testimony and not attacking her testimony are necessarily dependent upon each other.

 

Threats against the Kavanaughs and Fords are equally reprehensible.

 

This is the sort of bullshit the right passes around on their little idiot posts on FB - the same rabid drivel like this:



Complete idiocy and I see if on both sides every single day.

 

Why is CNN referring to Kavanaugh's FBI investigation as "reopening" his background check? Why not say the FBI is conducting another background check on Kavanaugh? Wouldn't that be more correct?

 

Sarcasm doesn't always have to make rational sense... Of course I reject anybody threatening either of these people or their families.

 

Why would a female go to a party of Men and Boys, mostly, if not to engage in sexual wilds? There is no reason for females to go to frat parties, other than to engage in sexual activities. There are such social entities as sororities, you know. It is because of these facts, I am not buying Dr. Ford's cutesy act. She was a Loose Goose. Regrettably, her antics, along with Diane Feinsteins' uncanny witch-hunt, are negatively effecting a person's life.
BTW, I never said that ALL girls in high school are debaucherous, I was particularly mentioning the Loose Goose Party Girls.

 

Loose Goose?? Are you kidding me??

Her story is: she went to an impromptu party (probably not knowing who exactly would be there) wearing a 1 piece bathing suit (We can guess the style of suit, but if it was a 15 year old at a country club, I'm guessing pretty utilitarian) UNDER other clothes after a day at the pool, had a beer, went upstairs to pee in private, and got jumped...

I'm not saying your first sentence is incorrect... we all know those girls do exist... But you have no background or obvious intent with this particular story...

Loose Goose.... LMAO

 

Perhaps you didn't go to many parties in high school but the young girls I saw at those parties were generally interested in meeting boys but they weren't their to get laid by random boys. To make that sweeping generalization seems a bit off. You can't jump to that conclusion - at all.

 

Meanwhile back at the Ranch, or better yet, back in Reality, no one can recall where the party was, what time the party was and the date that party supposedly took place. She also claimed that she cannot flight on an aeroplane, yet it is KNOWN that she is a frequent flyer and those are just two of the problems little miss prissy has concocted. As for her time as a Loose Goose, it will stand until proven otherwise and by your own admission, she attended an impromptu party so my contention is correct, ONLY Loose Girls looking to party, i.e., Loose Gooses attend such parties.Yet I am supposed to believe Prissy's B.S. and divorce logic and accept her theatrical performance, which will never happen being that I grew up in America (the United States of) and like most others, I recall the types of parties that took place during high school and knowing that college parties are much worse.. To think, between Miss Prissy and Sinator Fienstein, the confirmation process has be turned into a circus.

 

It is a known fact that at such parties, there are frequent sexual activities, drunkenness, drugs, etc. It may not have been the intention of the boys or girls who attend the parties to have sexual relations, but it is known that such activities do take place which is why I made the statements that I have.

 

She also claimed that she cannot flight on an aeroplane

Please present link or quote from her or her lawyer to back up THAT particular brand of BS...

The claim was she has a FEAR of flying, which millions of people legitimately do... that doesn't mean most of those people aren't capable of doing whatever they need to do to drag their butts on a plane, including heavy sedatives if needed...

Obviously she can flight (??) on an aeroplane (AKA airplane) explained by her presence in Washington DC from California

Where do you get this crap?? Never mind, I know where...

 

THE LEFT AND THE DOUBLE BIND: setting a new standard for chutzpah.

The left’s attack on Kavanaugh involves the following, which I think sets a new standard for chutzpah: take a man with a sterling public record during his entire life, mount an attack on his integrity that involves an unsubstantiated, uncorroborated, impossible-to-defend-against charge of sexual attack (up to and including gang rape), and do it at the pinnacle of his career, unleashing a social media war against him of the most vicious kind, including death threats towards him and his family. Do that publicly while cloaking yourself in self-aggrandizing sanctity, and make him sit there and listen.

But that’s not the “chutzpah” part, although that does take some chutzpah. The real chutzpah part is this: if he acts at all angry in his response to being defamed in that way, say that his anger shows that he doesn’t have the temperament to be a justice, despite the fact that it is well-documented that he has shown an exemplary judicial temperament for his entire previous career as a judge.​

They don’t call it “Kafkatrapping” for nothing.

 

To claim that all accusations are coordinated that takes khutzpah.

 

Egoboy, either you are playing games or you did not listen to the Kavanaugh hearing. Here:

source: https://www.wral.com/kavanaugh-back...of-flying-in-bid-to-discredit-story/17877801/

There you have it, Prissy "The Loose Goose" Ford LIED, which by the way LYING under oath is CONTEMPT!

 

Just because such activities do take place at some parties doesn't mean that is why this 15 yr old girl went to parties. I've been to many mixed parties with both alcohol and drugs where no one was having sex. For you to reach this conclusion is really bad logic. Of course I'm not sure this party even took place as it may have been just something falsely remembered under hypnosis.

 

Call it bad logic all you want, but it is known about females and sexual exploration. Beside, Loose Goose Ford was not fifteen, who is the focus of discussion which does not negate what I have previously stated. I will leave this example for clarification: "Show your and I'll show you mine". who are the initiators of these incidents? Boys or Girls? BTW, I already know the answer, because girls become physically aware before boys.

 

You are a lost puppy and need a good home....

 

Haven't seen this here yet

Looks like he knew about one of the coming allegations prior to its public release

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/poli...e-it-became-public/ar-BBNOH2l?ocid=spartanntp