Kim Dotcom: "Let Me Assure You, The DNC Hack Wasn’t Even A Hack"

Kim Dotcom: "Let Me Assure You, The DNC Hack Wasn’t Even A Hack"

Well now, I wonder if there will ever be any followup on this. Certainly seems to be something that should be looked into.

 

Really old story.

 

Another day, another bit of right-wing disinformation, probably originally disseminated by a Russian troll somewhere.

 

Ah, so no one should follow up on it because it goes so far back as 18 Feb 2018. Alzheimers?

 

Translation - It might make your irrational Red Scare look silly.

 

Seth Rich/Wikileaks conspiracy theories go back to 2016.

 

KimDotCom's statements on this are 18 Feb 2018. He says he has proof. Not interested in proof anymore?

 

Kimdotcom has been bragging that he has proof since May of last year. Never produced a shred of evidence back then, either. It's just click-bait for trolling people like you and Hannity.

 

He would have to come here to testify and that is a problem for him so he wants assurances that he will not be put under arrest. Those that are not interested in proof will keep it that way.

 

So I see you've dropped your claim it is a new story. Good for you.
The "proof" is still just click-bait material. Kimdotcom thanks you for your duplicity.

 

Translation - anything to ignore the story.

You think proof just goes away because you ignore a story?

 

I think proof is proof when it is ACTUALLY presented - not when it is just click-bait. He's been claiming he has "proof"
since May of last year to get people like you to keep him relevant. You even thought this was a new story. He's playing you for a fool.

 

In other words, you are not interested if it is fact or not.

 

Asinine response on your part. If I just said that proof is proof when it's ACTUALLY presented, not just used a click-bait - how did you pull "not interested" from your ass?

 

ONly takes 10,000 hours or so to become an expert in anything. Even hard stuff like pulling idiotic responses out of one's arse.

 

So, he's claimed he has evidence and has provided nothing. Meanwhile, Russians were reaching out to the Trump campaign offering dirt on Clinton, including hacked emails, before the hack was public knowledge. So . . .

 

Oh, wait, no . . . he did finally release FBI documents about Seth Rich in 2017 . . . which he was later forced to admit were fake.

https://gizmodo.com/kim-dotcom-says-fbi-file-about-seth-rich-is-fake-but-h-1795646891?IR=T

 

When Amb. Murray of the UK claimed russia was not the source of wilkileaks, and that he knew who was, the media blacked him out. The same man who won an award for integrity and honesty in a public servant. When VIPS got access to some data, and proved it was in insider who got the DNC emails, nothing came of it. There was not even an attempt to debunk either Murray or VIPS. That should tell you something. Especially given the integrity involved in both Murray and VIPS.

Assange basically implied Rich was his info source. Crickets. He even put up a reward for info that would help out in the case to find the murderers. Not something he would do if Rich was not the leaker.

Of course if we had a real free press today, all of these people would be involved in news stories and investigative journalists digging into what these 3 people tried to tell us. Instead, we got black outs. Nothing to see here, move along.

 

Assange is explicitly pro-Russian. He releases dirt on other countries, but buries dirt on Russia instead of leaking it, even going so far as to actively try to discredit it. The man had a show on Russian government propaganda television. Russians reached out to the Trump campaign offering hacked emails before the DNC hack was even public. Kim Dotcom has already been caught "releasing" fake information about the hack.

 

I bet the russians hacked hillary's private server given state dept info would have been on it.

I bet the DNC had an insider like rich who downloaded those emails on something like thumb drives and Amb. Murray of the UK was the man who gave them to assange. VIPS presented the evidence for the inside job. And early on, Murray announced russia was not the source, for he was probably the guy who took the thumb drive back to the UK to turn over to wilkileaks. Of course Murray was then blacked out in the media. Our CIA does not all of the time. For the truth will set you free and we sure as hell cannot have that happening, can we?

Too bad russia did not turn over those 30 thousand emails hillary had bleached out from her server. Perhaps they held them back in case she won so they could blackmail her? Perhaps they still have that info in the hole? To use later on if need be? Otherwise she might be in prison now.

 

I'm thinking of taking up yoga and I want to learn the 30,000 yoga positions.

 

You know, if there was not something in those 30M emails which she was scared for them to be seen, using the delete function would have sufficed. That a bleaching software was used means, logically that she wanted nothing left of those emails. So, an extra step was taken in order to destroy them, for some info would be left on the PC if only the delete function was used, which could be retrieved by law enforcement or intel. And they were bleached out, after she had received the order to turn them over. The FBI didn't see anything suspect about that, nor anything else she did. And now perhaps we know why given who was involved in that with the FBI.

Can you imagine if trump had did any of this? Can you imagine if the RNC had helped to rig it so trump would win the repub primary? And the details had been turned over to wilkileaks to be published? Hell, just look at how the dems used a charade, a ruse, a lie about trump putin conspiring against hillary in order to distract away from their anti democratic banana republic behavior in the primaries.

It is just too bad that the democrat voters did not learn a thing about the DNC and the party, thanks to an insider who leaked to wilkileaks. The only thing they seem to have learned was believing a lie about russia beating hillary. I just hope there are enough sanders voters who will make sure this corrupt party of the elites will not win elections in the future, until they reform and divorce themselves from the elites and represent the common man again.

 

How to Delete Secret Emails from Microsoft Exchange Server .


Do you have private, secret, or confidential emails on your Microsoft Exchange server that you do not want someone else to see? One user of BleachBit seems to have mixed success with this task: on one hand some emails have been found, and on the other emails were deleted "so that even God could not read them."

To maximize the destruction of sensitive information you must physically destroy all storage devices that may have stored the information. Examples of physical destruction include thorough magnet degaussing followed by use of a hammer and blow torch, or just give it to a young child.

There are some scenarios where physical destruction is not possible or desirable such as: there are some emails you want to keep about yoga and wedding plans, you do not want to reinstall software, or you want to make it less obvious that you removed any information.

Assuming physical destruction is not possible, follow this guide to improve your results:

1. Shut the doors and curtains, and turn on loud music.
2. Using an email client such as a Blackberry smartphone delete the confidential emails. From the trash too.
3. PROTIP: After you think you are done deleting emails, double check. Do a search for the keywords classified, secret, and Benghazi and the top-level-domains .gov and .mil.
4. Wipe or destroy all BlackBerries and all other devices that were ever mail clients for the affected account.
5. From a separate computer download portable BleachBit for Windows. The download is anonymous, free, and leaves no money trail.
6. Unpack it onto a portable storage device such as a USB drive.
7. On the email server:
   1. In Microsoft Exchange run a Page Zeroing operation to hide traces of the deleted emails, though this may still leave some traces.
   2. Connect the portable storage device to the email server.
   3. Disable and delete the Windows page file.
   4. Stop the Microsoft Exchange and other network services.
   5. Close all applications.
   6. Start BleachBit.
   7. Click File - Wipe Free Space, and use it for each fixed storage device. This will help eliminate residual traces of secret information on parts of the server's storage device that are marked not in use.
   8. Wait a long time.
   9. While you wait, clean the server's case, keyboard, and screen "like with cloth or something" to remove any fingerprints.
8. Destroy the portable storage device.
9. Destroy the replicated copies.
10. Delete all backups.
11. Do likewise on all remote email servers for all emails sent. For example if you sent emails to someone at state.gov, then you need to clean that email server too.

Because you probably do not have access to other people's email servers, the last step is the most difficult. It depends who you know.

Consult your Microsoft Exchange administrator for help. PROTIP: Consider what kind of witness would this person make.

Next time consider if you do not want someone to see private information, do not record it in the first place, and play by the rules.

https://www.bleachbit.org/news/how-delete-secret-emails-microsoft-exchange

 

Those Russians! Aren't they just the handiest thing since sliced bread?

 

Here's a recent update from Kim.

Kim Dotcom has called on Twitter to stop 'censoring' tweets, saying he’ll create an alternative to the social network if it continues. Dotcom told RT he believes Twitter is targeting tweets about late DNC staffer Seth Rich.
Tweeting early Saturday, the Megaupload founder urged Twitter’s Jack Dorsey to “stop messing with our free speech” and warning that if Dotcom creates an alternative platform, “Twitter could be toast within a year”.

Dotcom had earlier tweeted about Seth Rich, the DNC staffer who was murdered in July 2016. Rumors that his death was in some way connected to the hacking or leaking of DNC emails during the US presidential primaries have circulated since he died. Dotcom maintains he knows who passed the DNC’s emails on to WikiLeaks, and why.

Dotcom told RT many of his followers had shared similar experiences with retweeting, saying that it seems the platform “is actively targeting accounts that talk about the Seth Rich case.”

“There is a large number of Twitter users out there, especially Trump supporters, who claim that they sometimes cannot even retweet the tweets of the President,” he added. “I’m thinking this isn’t just a bug. I think Twitter is proactively interfering with free speech because of the political bias of its leadership,” Dotcom said. “And if that is true then the time has come for a Twitter alternative, a neutral platform without censorship.”

https://www.rt.com/news/420428-twitter-censorship-kim-dotcom/


Something smells rank with this. The DOJ should offer Kim Dot Com amnesty to come to Washington DC to testify with supporting material. This is yet another thing Mr McGoo has failed to do.