So you are contending that only "convicted felons, foreign tourists, illegal aliens and other assorted non voters" supported ending the oppression of gays in 2003? Those people make up 54% of the population?
They harm themselves. Perhaps the poster you responded to supports what he supports for the lgbtq's own good.
And those non-voters make up 54% of the population? BTW, thank you for admitting illegal aliens don't vote.
People who drink and smoke are harming themselves. Should drinking and smoking be made illegal? Should the government put someone in prison because they had a cigarette?
You realize that @Mac-7 believes sodomy laws should be on the books and that gay and trans people should be imprisoned and oppressed to the point where they return to the closet, right?
Wow! What happens when lesbian feminists find out they have dropped in the SJW hierarchy of victims? And what happens when normal blacks or hispanics find out how far they have dropped below lesbians and people with "gender disphoria". Have the SJW leaders put out a top ten list in the victim hierarchy so we can all know who is absolutely the tippy top victim and who is an also ran who will get a voice mail when phoning in an offense complaint?
Yeah, look at how white men aren't even allowed to go to college. If they attempt to they are beaten and killed, or put in prison.
I don't follow other posters nor see any such post, but I notice he supported my post simply calling for them to keep their sex lives private. It's what I do and I recommend it to everyone. I have a problem myself with anal sex, no matter who practices it: hygiene. Not, again, if it's consensual and private ... no, even then I find it objectionable. It has accounted for lots of illness and death. Read a book called "And the Band Played On." People like me were called sexual nazis by people who then died of AIDS. What are you gonna do?
Except if gays do any normal every day stuff like holding hands or kissing their SO in public (stuff that heterosexuals do all the time) anti-gay bigots call that "throwing their sexuality in their faces". You realize that more than half of homosexuals do not engage in anal sex, yes?
Look how they have to attend indoctrination classes on "white privilege", are protested from occupying offices on certain campuses, are denigrated, shamed in class by progressive teachers. For some it would be a short ride to the gulags if the fat tattooed, pink hair, lezzy professors had their druthers. Look at "diversity and inclusion" departments that put out guidelines for hiring that effectively exclude white men from even applying for positions or achieving tenure.
Yeah, 70% + of the vote in many of the 34 states that attempted to preserve marriage as between normal people. Including CALIFORNIA where 52% voted to preserve normal marriage before activist judges overrode the will of the people . 54% of Californians were "old bigots"? Sure. Uh huh, yee.
I don't like to see people slobbering all over each other in public, straight or gay, sorry. I'm not crazy about watching grown men hold hands in public. There was a more civilized period in history when it was frowned upon, and with good reason.
Except that isn't what we are talking about. We are talking about Lawrence v Texas and the unconstitutional sodomy laws that bigots enforced via law.
"More civilized period" aka back when gays could be locked in prison or mental hospitals. You might think oppression is civilized but I don't. I bet you'd prefer North Korea over America though. They have lots of laws against gays.
Half of gays are lesbians and a significant minority of homosexual men do not engage in anal sex at all. Statistically, there's WAY more heterosexuals that engage in anal sex at least once.