Lesbian Feminist: Trans Is a ‘Misogynistic Trojan Horse’

Read some history on Lawrence v Texas and how the incident was a set up by activist lawyers and judges. Just like members of the Massachussets Supreme Judicial Court (one of whom was married to an NYT columnist who was a propagandist for the cause) conspired with activists to eliminate the ban on homosexual marriage in contravention of the will of the majority of normal people.

 

You shouldnt make up quotes I didnt say

I dont want to see homosexuals locked up

In fact I think opinions are evolving much to my dismay

And we will just have to live with the consequences of that

 

The majority of people do not have the right to deny freedoms to others unless they have a compelling reason to do so.

 

Just stay away from other people's anuses and we'll be cool. If you are referring to blood transfusion recipients like hemophiliacs, they are blameless. If you mean drug addicts, I'm against that too. I hope I don't have to spell that out.

 

So you do not want to see the "will of normal people" respected and for sodomy laws to be on the books and enforced?

 

Well I'll be damned. He owes you an apology.

 

I'll give him one if he can truthfully answer my direct question.

 

More like devolving.

 

Yes, to the bigot, more freedom is a devolution to their fascist dreamworld.

 

There are health benefits to red meat, though I condemning the consumption of meat out of sympathy for animals I certainly respect. But again, anal sex is just unhealthy. Condoms break. Rectums tear. Is this really hard?

 

Freedom to engage in anal sex? Oh, brother.

 

With lube, the chances of either of those things happening massively drops.

 

Yes. People are allowed to do what they want with their bodies and the consent of another person that they wish. I think its funny how you can always tell the real libertarians from the Republicans who just hate taxes the instant you bring up drugs, anything to do with sex, or freedom of movement.

 

And therein lies the conundrum. Who defines the compelling reason? The situation has so suddenly reversed that the people who requested tolerance of their perversion are today denying the right of those who don't approve to speak or hold an opinion. The founder of Firefox was forced from his company when it was discovered he contributed $1000 to the campaign in California to preserve normal marriage. Speakers who hold an opinion that even Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton claimed to have held as late as 2013 are denied forums or shouted down. People are denied employment for believing in marriage preservation or that there is no such thing as transgender.

Those who requested "tolerance" are completely, tyrannically, fascisticly opposed to tolerance of views that were (and I suspect still are) mainstream just a few short years ago. The homofascists don't think there will be a backlash to their tyranny. Donald Trump was the first step in the resistance to their tyranny. He isn't the last.

Normal people have been so shocked at the suddenness and severity of the attacks by the speech tyrants they have had to have a little time to get their bearings. It was hard to believe the ferocity of the attack on our freedoms of thought and speech. The continuing advocacy of more depraved perversion (desire of parents in some communities to mutilate 5 year old CHILDREN to the cause of "transgenderism" and there are more advocates of pedophilia than ever) is showing who those who demanded "tolerance" from normal people really are. They are storming the castle of the sane and normal. They will find out in the near future how small their numbers really are and their loud voices won't be the winning factor in ruling the 97% of people who are normal.

 

This is like saying Jews should be tolerant of Nazis. Anti-gay bigots want to force gays into the closet, they want to make them into second class citizens at best. When one side wants to destroy the other side and one side just wants to be equal and treated as equals, there is no equivocation.

 

In your native Liberish maybe

But that does not apply to any conservatives I know, all of whom speak English

 

I think society has taken an unfortunate turn for the worse

The consequences of which have been all downhill

 

I don't see any desire of the various versions of sexual perversion just wanting to be equal or treated as equals. They are demanding normal people not only tolerate them but to CELEBRATE their perversions. They want normal people to occupy the closet, to not have the natural reaction of disgust, disdain and revulsion at some of their demands ("gender fluidity" anyone?) Look at what is happening to Chik-fil-A. Derided as a hate group because its OWNER supported traditional marriage, not for any actions the company itself has taken.

Imagine, just expressing the idea that marriage should be reserved for normal people in a man - woman relationship is now considered "hate" when that position was the law of the land and the opinion of the President of the United States in 2013 (want to see the videos of Obama, Clinton, etc,.) The Family Research Council is the victim of an attempted mass shooting because the corrupt SPLC put them on a list of "hate" groups.

Your argument that homosexuals just want to be treated fairly, live and let live, is not the extant model in today's progressive milieu. Had they stuck with that model, there would be far less hostility between normal people and sexual deviants today. They did not, they want to punish and silence us. There eventually will be conflict. I don't know what form it will take, but the more the fascists and tyrants rule among progressives and the more they suppress and attempt to oppress us (getting people fired, businesses shut down - the Colorado Baker,e.g - churches excluded from public activity, etc.) the more severe the response will be.

 

What are you talking about? I told you I object to it. That doesn't mean I want to outlaw it. I also object to Instagram, Madonna, and rap music.

And if you have to lubricate to insure against tearing, that sounds pretty unnatural to me. Unless you mean saliva, and I don't even want to know how that got down there.

Hiw about just keeping your pecker in a more hospital location? For the sake of your and the boyfriend's health. Mutual handjobs and you can get back to non- sexual activity, if you can think of anything else.

 

Well, yes, I actually do say that, if all the Nazis want to do is march and have meetings. It's their right. Intelligent Jews like Alan Dershowitz understand this. Why can't you?