The Hebrew in the passage is quite obscure, it is interpretation to insist it means male homosexuality. It could simply be saying that male homosexuals should not have sex on a woman's bed.
Every living person has a lifestyle, please review your faulty grammar False, newborns cannot deny the existence of a God, to claim they can is patently absurb bullshit.
Atheists do not deny existence they do not believe because there is no evidence Newborns also do not believe Very similar
no knowledge if in fact that is the case is not "do not believe", puhlease...... atheists cant acknowledge the existence of God and be atheist so of course they deny, no one cares about their reason, or lack thereof.
That is the case. Newborns have to be indoctrinated . Atheists reject the indoctrination. Very similar
Then they are not atheist yes you prefer they are indoctrinated to the atheist religion so they can grow up to be like the atheist god, Josef Stalin.
Atheism is not a religion. That has long been proven. You do consistently fell flat and lost that argument as you well know Babies are atheists because they do not believe
Citation? bullshit, if you want to get into that foolishness, then they are agnostic because neither do they 'disbelieve'.
All of threads where you were debunked and proven wrong in your arguments That is not an accurate description of agnostic
just bait, no citations, as expected, plonk! (thats the sound of your claims just made as they hit the bottom of the trash can.)
Yes plenty of citations The many threads where you made the same claim and got destroyed which is not my opinion but fact and you know it
NO one has the "same desire" to "know" imaginary unicorns which is why the "suppression" allegation is utterly BOGUS. Belief in an imaginary deity is entirely LEARNED behavior ONLY. Sexual attraction is an inbuilt desire that applies to both heterosexuals and homosexuals.
It's the same reason that kind of relationship between unmarried heterosexuals is a sin, they wr If homosexuality is genetic why is it increasing?
?? That's certainly not how one goes about determining questions such as the one you point to. And given social pressures, expectations, developmental age, etc. it's pretty common for many not to know their sexuality when they are school kids. Besides, one must assume your friends are from a like minded community, incuding those steeped in the direction of abstinance outside of marriage and the sinfulness of thoughts outside the one direction considered to not be sin. Then, you want to believe they should have known? And, if they DID know they would have told YOU???
Gays and lesbians having a different word existed before ancient greece. Lesbians aren't gay. There is no gay gene in women
Abstinance is antithetical to being a human. But, you did't get it. When following abstinance it isn't likely a teen is going to gain a full understanding of their sexuality. And, I'd guess you would be the LAST person withwhom someone would discuss their sexuality. Why would they volunteer to get crap off of you? Do you think they somehow don't get enough crap off your type without going in search of it?
This is NOT about words. But, as for words ... Using "gay" to suggest same sex orientation is something that came about in the mid 20th century and meant "same sex oriented", not specific to male. Besides being confused about terminology, you're still TOTALLY confused about biology.
It referred to other immoral behaviors before that time. The word homosexual didn't exist during Bible times but there were words that had the same meaning. The word gay community on Wikipedia refers mainly to male homosexuals and the lgbt community term exists for similar reasons. I'm not confused about biology. Wikipedia's article on sexual orientation says in males it has more biological non social causes.