Liberals are like abused women

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Spooky, Apr 24, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's not a paraphrase. "to contribute more" is not the same as "get more".
     
  2. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice try.
     
  3. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyway, the top quintile contributes the lion's share of the nation's income
     
  4. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Your assertion is based upon an inference you are making without evidence, support, or even rational argument, that the income someone gets is equal to the contribution they make, because it suits your political ideology.

    You've utterly failed to show any prove or evidence that your inference is accurate.

    Your assertion that the "rich are contributing the lion's share" to the nation's income is thus shown as nothing more than unsubstantiated, baseless say-so based on partisan ideology.
     
  5. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The nation's income is the sum of all individual incomes. The higher one's income, the more one contributes to the nation's income. It's basic math.
     
  6. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Your assertion is based upon an inference you are making without evidence, support, or even rational argument, that the income someone gets is equal to the contribution they make, because it suits your political ideology.

    You've utterly failed to show any prove or evidence that your inference is accurate.

    Your assertion that the "rich are contributing the lion's share" to the nation's income is thus shown as nothing more than unsubstantiated, baseless say-so based on partisan ideology.

    How many times to you want to repeat the same thing over and over?
     
  7. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, I'm not inferring that. I'm not saying that at all.
    Maybe it would help if you gave your own definition of "the nation's income"
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2018
  8. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let's make it easy.

    We'll take *your* position, that "the amount that someone contributes is always the same amount they get, and the amount they get is always the same amount they contribute."

    With that position, we can rephrase your statement to be: "top quintile gets the lion's share of the nation's income."

    And with that, we can all agree.
     
  9. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Contributes, not gets.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2018
  10. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Using your position and inaccurate definition -- same thing:


    Top quintile gets the lion's share of the nation's income.

    Yep.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2018
  11. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's backwards. The nation's income is the sum of everyone's individual income. Each of us contributes to this sum. The rich just happen to contribute the lion's share.
     
  12. Lee S

    Lee S Moderator Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    10,647
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Trophy Points:
    113
    THREAD LOCKED - Rule 3 - Flamebaiting

    This thread was locked because the OP engages in flamebait using an extreme example of domestic abuse to describe members of this forum's motivation in dealing with trade policy.

    The thread was not deleted in its entirety because intelligent discourse on trade policy did eventually emerge.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2018
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page