Uneducated america supported Trump and a large chunk of Educated America refused to vote for her because they wanted to cry about not getting 100% what Bernie said he would do when she met his policies half way. 12 minimum, reduced tuition, cheaper healthcare is better then the trash we have now.
Like what, how is that going to show up in his tax returns. That would be evident in his financial more disclosures he has filed. What conflicts of interest are shown in those.
Which demographic is the least educated in this country. Which demographic voted over 90% for Clinton? Define "uneducated", anyone who did not go to college is "uneducated"? That would be laughable.
However, Bluesguy does not know what he is talking about in terms of massive conflicts of interest by Trump or by who the most educated voted for.
I've said nothing about the law but you seem to think that is what you are going to find it his returns. Why hasn't the IRS found this illegality? Still waiting what do you think they are going to find in his returns that is already in his required financial disclosures he has already filed? And you do realize that even if the Democrats in the congress file to get them you won't be told what is in them.
Again thanks for proving it is just a witch hunt. You can't even clearly and concisely state what might even be in them that would have anything to do with his being the President. You do know he filled out a 90 page financial disclosure form as a candidate and filled out the required one as President last February, they are public record. What is it in his tax returns that would be so damaging to him that is not in those financial disclosure forms?
I'm all ears please fill me in, what conflicts on interest and how would they be shown on his tax returns but not his financial disclosure forms?
The rural Americans. and those who live in empty middle america or the south east, (outside of the city) who fail to have a grasp of basic critical thinking, commonsense and knowledge.
No, seeing the presidents' tax returns is about transparency. Thats why everyone else releases them. Very simple. What's embarrassing is that they have to be pried from him, and you should feel embarrassed for covering for that.
I think you are bitterly clinging to this. Acting AG Whitaker Pretty Much Tells Dems To Shove It: No Recusal From Overseeing Russia Probe https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...-shove-it-no-recusal-from-overseeing-n2535587
Oh ... he figured it out and he's been constantly reminded. Basically his "style" is to mutter snide remarks under his interwebs breath.
YOU are not going to see them even if the Democrats in the House somehow obtain them. And that you are left with the "transparency" thingy and can't even state what it is you are even looking for proves it is just another witch hunt. What's in his tax returns that is not in his financial disclosure forms that you are looking for?
That's not true try again. Which demographic in the Southeast has the lowest educational achievement and who do they overwhelmingly support? And define "uneducated"
It will prove some important things Is he a real billionaire. Who has he defrauded Is he profiting off of the government
Really? How so? Which line on your 1040 says how much wealth you have? Really? Which forms list the people you have defrauded? Really which for shows that? And you realize you will never see what is in his tax forms even if the Democrats get them from the IRS.
Democrats have won 33 house seats and with 13 seats still undecided but at least seven of them tilting to Democrats which would give Dems. a 40 seat pickup the largest number of gains since Nixon and Watergate,it would constitute a Democrat wave.They also picked up seven state governorships.
No you want and if any one on the House committee releases anything from them they will have committed felony and should go to prison for it.
