Being born, a person does not have too many 'choices' they can make. They are born within 'standards' of the place they are in. Different places have different 'standards'. And to live within these 'standared' places, it would seem pretty clear to stay within the 'standards' so as to not fall below or behind. But there are also the other places of 'higher standards'. And to live within those places would also require the upholding of those 'standards' to not fall below or behind. And as an adult, a person can choose to 'move' into different 'standardized' places for their well being.
The reason I say this is because if fights and wars are going to ensue because of certain things which God, Himself, has provided, then the fights and wars would be about God and not personal choices. So maybe, the 'standard' of places are and can be different from the Law(s) of God, which members living in that society might be held 'responsible and accountable' for. 1 community might have standards towards hygiene. Whereas another community might not have those standards to hygiene but to something else. So for a person who does not 'fit' or 'upkeep' those 'standards' due to any reason, that adult does have the right to relocate into a place where he or she is more suited for. An example of how someone might not fit into certain 'standards' could be a person who was raised in a certain way but suffered from a stroke and who was in a coma. And as this person may have suffered from amnesia of sorts, all of his/her past ways of keeping to the 'standards' were forgotten. And so to remain in that place, the 'standards' would need to be relearned from the very beginning. But given the person's age and circumstances, relearning for this person might mean an over filled life of stress.. First to have been placed in the coma and second to need to relearn and regain the life that was lost before he or she lost their previous identity. Alot of persons who go through this and rehabilitates usually has family there to support their rehabiliation. For those who may not, their rehabilitation to 'standards' can be more complicated and could be seen as unnecessary if there is no further use of his or her skills, as far as job skills, knowledge, might be concerned.
If everybody started working towards 'peace' wouldn't all the delusional things, regardless if from God or man, stop? And so the delusions that cause anti-God are coming from the ones who are anti-God to begin with, right? It's the anti-God's who are contrary to having peace formed. And the ones who allow subil anti-God sentiments to be kept preserved.. Such as: 'peace can be given by man without God needing to be within it'. Rather than just 'promoting peace' with a good willed sincerity, they promote a false sense of peace which allows for persons to be anti-Family and anti-Ruler. And they are claiming that this 'anti-family', 'anti-Ruler' way is a U.S.A way to the entire World. But with no other counters to this, the U.S.A begins to become known to be a Country to represent this, while using the Constitution as the giver of this right. And they would be pleased at this also, since they enjoy the 'fight' between the Godly and ungodly, to begin with.
There are supposedly 12.5 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. https://www.fairus.org/issue/illegal-immigration/how-many-illegal-immigrants-are-in-us But although they might be illegal, most other Countries have their Religiosity within it. Middle Eastern Countries are Islamic legislated, many in Asia have their 'set of standards' which are not contrary to family or rule, many European Countries also have their 'set of standards' which are also not contrary to family or rule. So where could these fighters against family and Rule come from? Where are these 'anti-God' persons coming from?
The major religions of the world: Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, etc... and then there is Secularism. Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, etc.. all promote family values and proper Rule respect. Secularism does not promote such things to family or respect to Rule besides to the person's individual choice within family and under Rule. If I was unhappy with my family or the One in Rule, I'd want to be a secularist also maybe. But God, as The Rule, would allow for these secularists to be free enough to pursue their goals. So why would they be contrary to that? It might be the 'standards' they are having a difficult time with while pursuing their goals to which a compromise might be demanded of for change. They have left family life thinking they know how public life ought to be. To them, the older generations will be gone soon, and they will be the ones to rule. From the older generation's point of view, it's their own heritage/last name, that is being jeopardized. The faithful know which group God prefers, but to these new secularists, they don't care too much what God prefers as long as their own joy and happiness can be free to not be infringed upon while living on the land they were brought into life on. They want to be 'free'. Some are in their 20s and 30s and 40s. The newly born ones, still are being slightly influenced by these adults... Why was same sex sexual practices 'needed' to be taught to grade schoolers? IF surveys show that less than 4 percent identify as being LGBorT? This 'mandatory' subject was even being taught in some European Schools. A 'mandatory' subject to teach of personal sexual activities of those who identify themselves in a less than 4 percent population??? What good would that serve? Of course there are those gatherings and parties which do not require LGBT status but 'free sex' for and among all and any.. but such persons do not need to have a particular 'orientation' as far as the traditional concept of LGBT is concerned.. there are supposedly non gay, hetero male 'porn' stars who participate in 'gay pornography' both as giver and recipient, yet they do not identify themselves as being 'gay'. It might have something to do with their delusion that God spoke to them that they were being non-macho or 'insecure' in their maleness. Delusional voices which they took to be God's. The entire 'war against God' could be the result of hearing 'delusional voices' they claim to be God. And so they lash out to do exactly what God made 'fun' of them on.. such as insecurity to their sex at birth. For those who are a little more idealistic to Who and What God IS, they take the door that leads out of such voices into a place where they can not be a part of that war, which they themselves are not really in until they are forced into it by being attacked by such 'Your God is a sh**' commenters which soon seems as if they can't or won't stop their attacking God. Which means that they themselves do not take an active role in realizing that God is not a piece of sh** for themselves IF they are rebutting the delusional voices they claim to be God.
Allow me to give you an example using Hawaii. Hawaii was at one time, only 1 Island. It was among a chain of Islands that many today call Hawaii. But then Hawaii was only 1 of those islands. After the unification of the islands, the chain of islands became to be known as just 'Hawaii'. And during that time, they had their own ways of doing things. Women were not allowed to eat in the same room as the males. etc... they had a set and structure of living that accommodated their lifestyle. Even their religion which was practiced was somewhat the same as it was before the unification. It changed in ways after the illegal unification of the islands but still, under the 1 monarch, he changed the religion around a little. After the lines of succession came to the Kingdom, Missionaries arrived because it was a new formed Nation. This new nation needed to be properly guided into the Nation's regristrar of nations and to do this, they needed to have commonalities with the other nations. And the Monarchy soon began to accept and learn the standards and morals of other Nations and their forms of Rule to citizens as well as their standards and rule to the other Countries. Now, it is said that Hawaii wants to break all of this to reenter into the Monarchal system under the very first illegal King of the islands rather than seek to continue where the last Monarch left off. Because of this, they have begun attacking the God of the last Monarch. And is trying to reestablish the faith the islands had prior to the unification.
If Hawaii is concerned with the illegal overthrow, they should still not neglect nor disrespect the last Monarch's personal choosing of God for her own life. Once again, it's not that difficult. If a set of youths or adults is trying to get back the islands so that their parents and grandparents can live more at comfort today, and if they want the islands back to themselves so that their own children can live in that way, the others, the residents and even the Government should assist.... seeing in fact, that the overthrow was illegal and should not have happened. Matthew 7:18 "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit." And if Hawaii is a product of a corrupt tree, how is it expected to even bear any good fruit? And this alone could be a reason why the entire United States is in the condition it is in.. Because number 1: Even after the Natives were dealt with, 2: The Constitution, which was formed as a 'good tree' is beginning to be cut down. The Natives may or may not have forgiven the 'corrupt tree' invasion. Hawaii may or may not have forgiven the 'corrupt tree' invasion. But the Constitution which was built up as a good tree is beginning to be cut and hacked upon. If a good tree is hacked down, how will it produce any fruit? So is the anger, enough to hack down the good tree(s), due to the illegality of any 'illegality' in the past? If so, doesn't individuals have a right or a duty to make the wrongs correct in one way or another, if it is up to current day citizens to make right the past mistakes? Because if there is a 'war' going on over illegal overthrows or illegal possession or illegal repossession, then who is to assist those who have not been involved in such illegalities to begin with; such as the upright in the way and righteous ones, who may have lived their life in accordance to Godliness and not according to the world of man. Why would there be any possibility of them being made to be involved in a 'war' they had and have nothing to do with? But if they are under any Government and that Government is being attacked and disrespected, then that might trickle down to them, as well.
To me, the dragging on of this matter when life can be made better even within illegal overthrows, is a waste of time and a vanity. Psalm 2:1-3 "Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? 2The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.' Psalm 2:4-5 "He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. 5Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure."
Who, but the unGodly pranksters, do this to begin with? Church shootings is seen by some as very evil while others see Church shootings as a 'prank'.
A possible solution to this is alot easier than difficult. A separation of the pranksters and the non pranksters.. To not keep intermingled, the pranksters and non pranksters. Deuteronomy 7:3-4 "Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly." But keep in mind that this was to have been practiced from within their Given and Allotted Land. Not upon someone else's Land which The LORD God did not give to them.. God gave this land to the Sons of Jacob and so the responsibility towards the 'natives' who may have suffered pains and damages is within God's responsibilities to which HE repays.. But as Jesus' Commission to "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen." in Matthew 28:19-20 was being done, they were also given the Commission to do so. And the United States was a Nation to which this Commission was brought in the very early years of it being a Nation. All it would take, if there is any doubt, is to do some library reading and research into the subject matter rather than taking every person's word for it. But isn't it strange how even some Government officials have not done this either but are just going with the flow of things?
