Lock her up! ... Lock her up!... Lock her... oh oh...

So they introduced the bill because Hillary committed an actionable crime.

Priceless!

Desperation and human reason are never friends.

 

They say exactly why they introduced the Bill - because the Gov't was arming and supporting the radical Islamist Jihadists waging war on Syria - Jihadists which included Al Qaeda and ISIS.

You know this because I have posted it twice - after which you started screaming "Russian Bot .. Russian Bot" in a desperate attempt to make the bad thoughts go away - followed by projecting your desperation onto me - in a desperate attempt to demonize the messenger - because your mind can't handle the implications of the message.

So once again

https://gabbard.house.gov/news/StopArmingTerrorists

Now do you know why they introduced the "Stop Arming Terrorist Act" ? Perhaps it was to stop our Gov't from arming terrorists

Lock Her Up !!

 

Why would they introduce a bill to make it a crime if, as you imply, what she did was already a crime?

You have proven both that that your desperation is pathetic and also that all of this is absolutely irrelevant to this thread. Which is, as stated on the OP, that Hillary is exonerated of yet another actionable crime she was accused of by the right, and by yet another government agency. And, worse yet, by yet another Trump administration government agency.

In other words, no "lock her up". None of the "you'll see when the report comes out" that Republicans announced on this forum.... And I also say again: she has the honor of being the most exonerated politician in History. And I'm talking about multiple bi-partisan exoneration.

 

You are on denial pills - The stated reason for this bill is what it is. I did not write it - you calling me desperate for delivering the message - is what is desperate.

Why they stated - "US was arming terrorists in Syria" - does not change the fact that they stated "US was arming terrorists in Syria"

I is this reality that you re desperately trying to deny in this 'thought avoidance' dance you are doing.

 

Wnen somebody commits a crime, you don't write a bill. You lock them up.

Hillary is free.... What else did you want to know?

 

Not all criminals get locked up - Hillary is proof of this. The Nazi's did not lock Hitler up - but this does not make him any less of a criminal.

 

Nobody in Germany spent millions of taxpayer money over almost 30 years trying to pin Hitler down on some crime with investigation after investigation carried out by those who opposed him, all of which concluding that he did not commit any crimes.

Republicans of this era will go down in History as the only ones ever who have made such fools of themselves at such a high cost to taxpayers.

 

Hilary is guilty. There is no doubt. Any of us peons would have been locked up for doing the same thing.

 

Thirty years of right-wing media telling right-wingers that Hillary is guilty of.... something.... Though nobody knows exactly what.... is not something some people can let go just because yet another investigation carried out by the Party who has been after her all this time proves that she committed no crime.

 

Following this logic, you must also think that Al Capone did not commit any other crime besides tax evasion. Jeeze, for someone who supposedly, according to their signature, takes a lot of time in thinking about their arguments, this one is as deep as a kiddie pool.

 

Read the FBI report. It discusses the classified documents found on her server. The server was not certified for classified information and that is against several federal statutes.

 

What nonsense! Al Capone was in prison many times before being convicted for tax evasion. He had multiple trials and was convicted multiple times.

Your "logic" is rewriting history. But you won't correct your statement anyway, will you? Facts are not something that interests the right.

 

yeah.... read the FBI report, the IG report, the DoJ report, the State Department reports, the many Congressional and Special Committee reports... What do they have in common? No actionable crimes.

So... whatever she did.... it was clearly just not an actionable crime. Period!

 

That has nothing to do with the point being made - and this is all just another avoidance tactic on your part - because you can not deal with the truth.

Congress has stated that the US was arming the radical Islamist proxy army in Syria - including our friends Al Qaeda and ISIS - supporting the mission to turn Syria into a strict sharia totalitarian wonderland.

Have you no sense of right and wrong ? or do you just lose that sense when your partisan blindfold is on ?

 

Weren't you even a bit curious about what that post you are quoting was responding to? Hint: Not to anything you said. Why didn't you find out before you responded to it?

It's clear that you pay attention to what is going on in the thread with the same attentiveness you use to analyze political events. And that's why you fail.... in both.

 

I am curious - about your continued denial of reality - Lock Her Up !

As per your comments about wasting tax dollars on pointless investigations - May I present to you "Russiagate"

 

Again the deepness of your thought is measured in shallow depth. The point I was making is that the government could not get Capone on the string of murders he was responsible for. Instead, they were able to get him on tax evasion, as opposed to, say, the Saint Valentine's Day Massacre. In other words, just because the government has not yet found enough evidence to prosecute Clinton, it does not mean she is innocent. Further, even if they have enough evidence for a probable conviction, Clinton, a former Secretary of State and wife of a former president, is not your average joe. As you know, or should know, the laws work differently for someone of such political prominence. Your argument is based on the assumption that Barr truly cares about carrying out justice by treating Clinton as a someone like you or me.

 

That's a lousy point. Because you are comparing him with Hillary who has never even been charged with any crime to somebody who died in prison. And who was tried many times... sometimes found guilty, sometimes not....

The comparison is idiotic. And it underlines the fact that when somebody is investigated as many times as Hillary has, chances are that, if they are guilty of anything, something.... even some smaller actionable crime, it would have at least been shown in any of the reports. And then they leave it up to prosecutors whether they want to take it to trial or not.

In case there is any doubt, Trump has shown us that many times over....

The fact that Barr doesn't care about justice and is there only to protect Trump does not change any of the reports. The reports are not saying "Hillary committed a crime, and it's up to the AG to prosecute". They're saying she committed no actionable crimes.

I'm not a Hillary fan. But the dirty moves that Republicans have used are astounding. Starting an investigation only because her poll numbers were too high, as Kevin McCarthy admitted. Extending the Benghazi investigation so they would not have to issue a report that exonerated her before the elections. The idiotic Uranium scandal. Smearing the Clinton Foundation, which has been responsible for much good and which has always kept their books wide open....

There is obvious obsession with Hillary. But she's not the only one that the right has fabricated scandals, with full congressional and Government agency investigations on things that, from the start, are obviously ridiculous. The right needs to stop that. And if ridiculing them, and those who fell for their nonsense, helps even a micro-smidgen to stop the nonsense... I'm all in. It's certainly worth it to try.

 

Comey said himself she lied and lied. Had classified mail on her phone. Destroyed 32,000 E-mails she was to turn over to the FBI. You think she should have been exonerated? Do you think Trump could get away with that? General Flynn lied once, when he didn't have to and had the book thrown at him. She committed plenty of crimes. Why she hasn't been charged is the question to ask. She must have dirt on all of Washington.

 

If you believe that lying is a crime, then I'm sure you'll be first in line at the "Lock Him Up" rallies that will be held against Trump when he leaves power.

And then you just repeat the nonsense of which all reports exonerate her.

 

Lying is a crime - and lying to congress a Felony - about arming radical Islamist Jihadists (aka Al Qaeda) in Syria (which was also a crime at the time) Guilty - Lock her up !!

 

Should be. Trump's count is at almost 17 thousand since his inauguration.

 

Shoulda woulda coulda - Lying is not a crime - except in certain circumstances - Like Hillary lying to congress about arming terrorist groups - Lock that door behind her - Pinstripe suite !

 

#221

#223

Let me know when you're done debating with yourself. Play nice!

On second thought... don't!

 

Funny the nonsense one can come up with when cherry picking phrases out of context

Even funnier when someone is reduced to such tactics - in an attempt at thought avoidance - because their perspective can not handle the factual information presented