Sir...in your book "The scamming of America" (9/11 Conspiracy), you accurately point out that a 757 hitting the Pentagon is a ridiculous concept from start to finish, and on page 54, you raise many interesting points concerning the absurdity of the idea. You write that theories including the plane (supposed plane) "bouncing" off the ground, cartwheeling, etc., (that were floated at the time) would be ludicrous. You accurately indicate that there was no massive debris like luggage, seats, engines, wings, a tail section, or even bodies present at the scene. You reference "modus tollens" (that if p=q, but not q, then not p, and if q must be true when when p is true, but q is NOT true, then p is NOT true either), which confuses me a bit. You state that it's it's an elementary rule of deductive reasoning, and the employment of it being fundamental to scientific investigations. Could you expand on this a bit please? I've read and re-read it several times and I'm confused by it. Thank you ahead of time Sir, and keep up the good fight and ignore the interference attempts of certain folks. The intelligent reader appreciates the effort I'm sure (I know I do).
Like I said..WASN'T Mr. Fetzer. Whomever is pretending to be Fetzer doesn't know how to respond specifically to what is in his own book.....therefore, he doesn't....because well,...IT ISN'T FETZER.
And once again we see the standard truther tactics at work. Don't like the truth? Ignore all the evidence, bury your head in the sand and sing "LA LA LA LA LA" as loud as you can until the truth goes away. In this instance a truther "hero" is exposed as a fraud and a liar. What do other truthers do? Face the truth? Nope. They claim he isn't who he claims he is even though he has been confirmed as the real deal. To fix this, the truthers are given the contact information so they can prove it to themselves or, if they are right, have the "real" Mr. Fetzer come on and defend his "good" name. Apparently that is too hard when it is so much easier to just deny the truth and run away.
Here's that contact info for you again. contact Jim Fetzer by email at jfetzer@d.umn.edu or by phone at 608-835-2707 You're starting to remind me of that other guy who would never contact the direct source.
Not Fetzer. He could have answered the question very easily...he chose not to. Specifics are often a problem with imposters.
Did you confirm that? Or do you "just know"? And contacting a direct source for verification is often a problem for truthers.
So he's an imposter because you say so?? My point is not moot unless you sent him an email and he replied saying that the "Jim Fetzer" posting on PF is an imposter. Have you done so?
Maybe he saw that you were the poster of the thread and decided not to read it. Gee, I can't imagine why anyone would want to do that... How do you even know he saw the thread?
Have you considered the possibility that he just didn't just care enough to respond to you? Maybe Jim is just unaware of how important you really are. You should contact him immediately and rectify this error.
Well, that's one point of view. Another is that the Mr. Fetzer here is just a creation by a shill entity (that lacks the ability to state what the ACTUAL Mr. Fetzer would be able to answer very easily from a book HE wrote) to further undermine the truth. All depends on what the agenda is I suppose.
The agenda appears to be hypothesis preservation. Someone who watches the following with an open mind might have an awakening. http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_harford.html Just in case you missed exactly which hypothesis I'm referring to, it would be this one:
So I've noticed an interesting point with truthers. When confronted by easily verifiable evidence that they can actually do themselves, truthers run away. Why? Is it because they already know the truth and don't want to have this excuse for lying taken away from them? Is it because they are afraid of the truth and don't want the possibility of the truth being confirmed? Is it because they are too lazy and are hoping someone spoon feeds them the answer they want? Is it because they just don't really care because it is just about the agenda not the truth? Food for thought as we watch truthers run from the truth.
I HAD an open mind following 9/11...until I explored the details and discovered they were mostly false. An awakening? I'm not the one sleeping.
So now you admit you have a closed mind? Wow. I guess you wouldn't want to debate you either given your statement in your other post. Just a reminder of what you said about debating closed minds.
Closed to a degree...yes. I've had over a decade to study the "official" story and find it to be dishonest. However, I'll consider proof that I'm incorrect at any point. I've seen none to date though. I see "enthusiastic" advocates, but little in the way of actual proof. The inconsistencies are all over the place though. There ya go...now attack.
You watched an 18 minute Ted talk in 10 minutes? Wow. Have you contacted Fetzer to see if your hypothesis is correct yet?
No need to attack. You do a fine job of proving the irrelevancies of your own posts. As for proof to the contrary, why is it you won't address the glaring inconsistancies in your own posts like claiming it was only two people behind all of 9/11 yet the one part of the theory you've claimed is what you believe would involve hundreds if not thousands of people. That doesn't even cover the rest of 9/11, just Shanksville.
Time, like many other things like truth, honesty, and the facts, are irrelevant to truthers, thus truthers can watch any video in any amount of time and still have the same closed mind to the truth. Mind altering concept, isn't it!
So you don't consider any of the information from the following page as proof that you're incorrect? https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/flight93page1
