Look who doesn't accept the result of the election

Not according to many expert.

 

Is defeat the new liberal euphemism for cheated? Seems as much. I saw that 89% of Wisconsin voters voted. And most of them were from Milwaukee. Gosh, the coincidence... AZ is a free for all now. PA looks like Democrats are still trying to rewrite the law as they go. GA looks like they are counting behind the curtain. This is like Eastern Europe kind of corruption from democrats. Poll watchers excluded. Poll watchers threatened on the street.

I suspect that liberal folks just thought they could bluff and that their machine would fill up the appropriate buckets of ballots and no one would notice.

As far as accepting the election results, when these states are certified, and Trump in fact does win, Guess you'll have to revisit your thread and explain how you will now accept the results of the elections.

 

What does that even mean. The post you cited was a prediction of what Democrats voted for. This response entirely misses the point. It's like it was written by code or something...

 

Van Jones seems to disagree with you. Perhaps your team need a huddle or something to get your talking points back on track...LOL

 

I don’t have a team. I speak for myself.

 

ONLY because it hasn't been INVESTIGATED! Are you AFRAID of it being INVESTIGATED? Like by AUTHORITIES maybe?

 

Your "eggsperts" on MSNBC are bs'ing you.

 

AND you want to elect a woman who withheld evidences of innocence and fought tooth and nail to deny DNA tests for a BLACK MAN on death row! Sweet bit of hypocrisy ya got goin' there.

 

Threads with proof have been posted here. Catch up.

 

Actually, he's on the republican side. Thank you, come again.

 

I don't want to elect anyone. Personaly, I've too much fun seeing you crash and burn.

 

Almost like Democrats have the capability of independent thought and don’t rely on talking points like many on the right do. This is much more of a mandate than the one that was given to trump... what was it you called it? The “trump mandate”

I would say over 4 million votes is much more indicative of the voice of the people than negative 2.5 million — but yrmv.

 

Lame, jus' lame.

 

But true nonetheless

 

The claim was that fraud has been PRIVEN TO HAVE OCCURRED. Proven. You seem to be suggesting that the lack of investigation amounts to proof that fraud has occurred. Which is kind of a strange approach to the burden of proof.

I’m not afraid of anything being investigated.

 

As interesting assertion. I have't seen independent thought in democrats for a really long time. Especially within their political mouthpieces. And when it was non stop marketing for a blue tsunami, or whatever variation of that, the chorus was lock step with that narrative. I would also point out that if the chorus was correct, the margin would have been well over 15 Million votes, not the +/- 2million currently being discussed.

But, as we so often have to re explain to folks on the left, apples and hand grenades. The election is always decided by the electoral college, which doesn't give a crap about the actual vote total nationally. However, given that Trump had 306 last time, that's about as wide a margin in modern history, and his mandate was massive given that perspective. Or at least, wasn't that what some of your other cohorts were spinning about when it was Bush by 1?

The discord in your tent seems indicative of the unwieldy nature of your party. But, sure, spin a web of mandate. We'll see how that works.

 

They found 138,000 "mail in" ballots at 4:30 in Michigan that ironically, 100% of those were for Biden setting him over top of Trump.. Seems legit.

 

Do you also call out Republicans for believing that a “landslide was going to occur, they seemed to happen with the same level of frequency

In the off chance that Biden gets 306 (or more), would you deem that a mandate?
You don’t have to incessantly reexplain that you believe the mandate comes from basically vacant land and not the people — that is evident.

Let’s watch what happens over the next few days / weeks and reevaluate. trumplicans are not going to enjoy the platitudes of “**** your feelings” and “you lost, get over it” that will absolutely be thrown in their faces. “Your president” is going to be my personal favorite.

 

Can anyone explain to me Trump (and Guiliani's) comment that they've already won?

 

Withdrawing from Syria has been called one of the worst acts.

https://apnews.com/article/3d9c19166a1c4283bb6533e30ec546dd

 

Who is "they"? Don't election boards involve both Dems and Republicans? Where were the Republicans when all this alleged "fraud" occurred?

Second, if Dems would be able to count votes without Republican input, doesn't the reverse hold true that Republicans could do the same? If they could, don't you think they would?

 

All curious questions for sure.

 

How is that graphic generated? Think man!!

 

So, you can't answer those questions, but just claim fraud based on feelings. OKAY!