Lower standards to allow white men into special forces

Pathetic.
So you get caught lying once again and this is the best you can come up with. If you had any proof of your claims we both know you would pay it. But you don't because you are doing nothing more then lying.
Run awa. Run away clown.

 

Believe me, there is nothing to debate.

 

Buy a better phone to post with.

 

Yeah, you like to egg on the newbie? I'm not the one going over the edge in a tizzy fit.

 

Still waiting for you to back up your claim. Actually I am not as we both know you can't otherwise you would but as appears to standard with you, you simply continue to lie like the dishonest clown you are.

 

No you are the one making up lie after lie. It's as obvious as it is pathetic

 

As I stated before, I would have guessed you are much younger than in your profile. Your writing style is juvenile and demonstrates mental laziness for lack of even minimal proof reading..

 

Women tend to be more emotionally mature than men. Maturity of mind is important in combat roles as is emotional control.

 

heh, actually you are! You've been emoting all over this thread.

 

Your problem if you can't handle emotis.

 

And I figured that someone who is as old as you claim to be would not still have the need to continuously lie and make up stories to try and support your nonsense argument but apparently you do.

 

I have no words.

 

Finally, the truth comes out.

 

Actually, standards change all the time. It depends on the needs of the military at the time.

At this time, waivers (lower standards) are increasing, ironically as the standards to stay in (RCP or "Retention Control Point") remains at the Obama levels. This has an interesting effect. Those that are on their 2nd or more enlistment are pushed out, as new people are being brought in.

Yea, I get it. You think that those who join are idiots and the uninformed. That is obvious in your words. People like you will never really understand those of us who serve.

 

Not as a response to the debate between the two of you (as my view is "thank you for your military service to our country, those who served in the military have served us all very well"), is it just people like him? Or all people who never served in the military - including spouses, parents and children of those in military service and everyone else who never served can not understand you or understand the military?

If you think the later, that only people who were in military service can understand people like you who did serve or the military, would then be accurate to say that people like you who did serve can not understand anyone who did not? That those who were in the military and those who were not can never understand each other?

 

Do that "you can't understand because you were not in the military" generally apply?

You complaint about the IRS and you have ways you want it changed, for which anyone in the IRS can claim "you never worked for the IRS so you just don't understand either IRS agents or how the IRS works." Thus, your view is uninformed, likely wrong and should be ignored? Or any other organization, governmental institution, agency or office that you were never employed by?

For example, a woman whose father was a colonel, her mother also in the service for 4 years - thus her a true military brat, with a grandfather who was career and 2 children current in the service for career, knows less than someone drafted to Vietnam for 2 years of service nearly 5 decades ago?

 

Sometimes, in a humorous sense - and not caring for the song at all - messages on this military thread seem like guys playing the role of the first 2 1/2 minutes or so of this video. Song then not worth listening too.

 

Good flash back, one of my D.I.'s at MCRDSD

 

IIRC, most special forces slots are already filled by white men.

And white men are not physically weaker or slower than black men on the average. As a football coach I can explain why it sometimes seems that way

 

Put them on compass course and see what happens.

 

Stipe Miocic would probably dispute that...MMA heavyweight champion.

 

It should be pure competition, not 'standards.' If you need 50 more spec-ops, test everyone who wants to try and take the 50 best, whether they're white, black, men or women.

Anything more complicated than that is sacrificing competency to acheive bureaucracy.

 

I am sorry but this post proves that you really don't understand this topic very well. Standards are how you ensure only people who are qualified to do the job are getting through the assessment courses of various SOF units. There are always more SOF personal needed then can pass the assessment.

 

The best solution is forming all-female special forces as it has been done in Norway. Israel also has a light infantry force that is made up of 70 percent female soldiers. All-female combat units should take on less dangerous tasks than men do.