Major Jewish Group ‘Appalled’ by Russian Bishop’s Blood Libel Accusation

If they prove an extreme high % of Jews were behind it in a country where Jews were a total minuscule minority, than this will lead to obvious conclusions.

 

LOL given the amount of pogroms the Jewish population had suffer under the then Russian government let by the Royal family I do not see the royal family being very popular with Jews but somehow given their position as victims I do not see them being in a position of leading any great rebellion at one percent of the population that was almost under constant attacks for the crime of being Jews.

 

The start of them pogroms was the murder of the Russian Tsar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesya_Gelfman

 

Sorry not true as the pogroms was ongoing way way before that time period and his death just another excused to killed/murder Jews by the villages worth.

Of course blaming Jews had always been ongoing from the Germans blaming Jews for the Reichstag fire to the nonsense we are seeing in postings on this website today.

Hell even outbreaks of the black death was at times blame on Jews poisoning the water supply.

Being a Jew had just had not been a lot of fun for the last two thousand years.

 

You mean properly indoctrinated.

How dare he not succumb to the marxist indoctrinated schools of the edjewcation system.

You sure about that, skippy? You MAY want to double check its story. There are phony holohoax survivors being vetted quite regularly these days.

 

I sourced that it is true.
The importance of Gelfman's role in the assassination was undetermined, and her Jewish origins stressed during the pogroms that followed the assassination.

 

I would had love to had seen you questioning/challenging the old woman account to her face of her losing not only her family but her whole small village.

Of course the whole holocaust is a made up story right my 'friend'?

 

If you look at the names of many Jews in Russia, rather than the name they adopted later to hide their identity, you will see that they are German not Russian. They came in from Poland with ideals stemming from the Enlightenment, which would have benefited them and given them more opportunities, but threatened the stability and cultural and religious identity of the Russian state.

Had the majority of the Russians at that time been Christians, there would have been no pogroms since passions are the antithesis of the peace given by the Holy Spirit, but they were not... and that's why Imperial Russia fell. Other than the immediate family of the Tsar who were very devout and suffered dearly for it, the majority of the nobility, (which was one tenth of the population), were heavily into the occult... and the outcome was 70 years of slavery. 15 thousand churches were destroyed, over 20 million Christians killed and among them 20 thousand priests, bishops and monks.

In Tsarist Russia there averaged about 1,000 terrorist attacks a year... and almost all the terrorists were Jews. They killed dignitaries and people in authority, and the Russians reacted with pogroms.... (which I'm not excusing believe me). The Russians wanted the Polish Jews to leave since they threatened the state... (the Tsar did give them a homeland in the East, which they still have). This would be the equivalent of having 2,000 of our senators, representatives, governors, police chiefs, mayors, etc., killed each year. Had that happened in the US, I think the American reaction towards the Jews or anyone would have been the same as that of the Russians. One author said that the mistake the Russians made was that they killed the terrorists immediately, rather than having them investigated to find their cohorts.

As an example, Tsar Alexander III had super human strength, and when a bomb went off in the train his family was in, he saved them by holding up the roof single handedly. He also witnessed the death and suffering of his father by a terrorist, and after his death his brother the Grand Duke Sergius was killed by a terrorist.

What is not known today, is that many of the social institutions attributed to the Soviets came from Tsar Nicholas II, and were brought about by his Minister Stolypin ...who of course ended up being shot by a terrorist in Kiev. Tsar Nicholas' major mistake was that he allowed a free press, which the Bolsheviks used to spread falsehoods and lies in basically the same way that the MSM is doing today.

Lenin with his support from the west, turned a nation that had the fastest economic growth in the world, into a system of government where millions ended up dying from civil war and starvation. The internationalist system in the Soviet Union, also gave rise to the opposing nationalism in Germany, which caused the deaths of many more millions in the world.

Evil begets evil. I see it no different from today, and what our future holds.

 

Your list is a teensy, tiny fraction of 1%.

I could list page after page of long gun murder victims. But the truth is there were just 358 long gun murders in 2010.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

 

Ah good. Well in the US it's widely known that a certain ethnicity punches above their weight with their contribution of violent crimes. Good thing you're kind of bringing that up. With facts like that you can make policies. And it starts to look like the Jews have punched above their weight in Russia.

 

You seem determined to reason from the specific to the general.

 

I made a link to crime and ethnicity in the US with crime and ethnicity in Russia. And I add, it's rather well accepted to keep track of ethnic statistics in the US. Maybe it has to do with black community looking bad. But when the Jews look bad in Russia, than suddenly this becomes a taboo.

 

Well one conclusion I come to from your question is that your simplistic heavily biased "interpretation" of history is classic bigotthink.

Banking and turning a profit know no ideology, if history is any teacher. In fact, banking wars for european leaders was one of the reasons jews were tolerated to the extent that they were. Seems all those good ol blubluds thought banking or "money lending" if you will, was not only beneath them but up until the 16th century catholics couldn't charge interest.

 

Wut? I'm all for it to find out if this Jewish conspiracy is true or not true, or to what extend it's true.
Seems a lot of people take offense to historic research out of ethnic/religious pride.

Right. You call my view simplistic. This banking nonsense is just totally irrelevant to the subject.

 

The point sails over your head... again.

 

It was you who brought in US statistics of gun violence.
I just turned this back to the topic with adding the statistics of violence, ethnicity punching above their weight in RUSSIA.

And at that point, you went blanc

 

So you're saying that it's wrong of me to start threads about news stories that involve jews because it might lead to another holocaust? And you know this because you've talked to a woman who claims to be a "holocaust survivor"? Man, I can't believe we're having this ridiculous conversation.

You mean like Irene Zisblatt, the "holocaust survivor" who claims that diamonds came out of her anus over and over again while she was in the "concentration camp"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irene_Zisblatt

Good grief...

 

You turned it back to your generalizing from specifics. I don't think you "get it."

 

If they want to make it a billion + 1, so what.
I dont even know if there was any research on this topic.

Exactly what is simplistic? Me not minding some ppl do some research? Good grieve.

How on earth is it relevant? lol

 

Going for crime committed by ethnicity on the topic of the OP,.. I indeed wouldn't know how this is not specific.

 

So you didn't know anything about it? Interesting that you have an opinion of researching settled history without having a clue that its been settled for decades.

Simplistic as in your one dimensional interpretation that as you have just informed me is based on an absence of actual knowledge of the topic to begin with

[quoteHow on earth is it relevant? lol[/QUOTE]

The OP claims that jewish new york bankers bankrolled jewish bolsheviks to murder the non jewish rulers of russia. I hope you can make the connection. Are you also ignorant of the protocols of zion and the global jewish conspiracy that jew haters just luv to regurgitate?

 

Who am I to judge that enough research has been done.
Even better... who are YOU to judge enough research has been done?

You're no expert either. So you're just as simplistic as I am. Thanks for playing.

well I can't find that in the OP.

 

Ah yes, the usual ad hominem.

This is a typical example of how you refuse to consider anything that doesn't fit your (extremely pro-jewish) narrative.

 

Refuse to consider? NONSENSE. I am intimately familiar with the jew hating propaganda you indulge in, and in the kinds of characters that inhabit such space.

You confuse my refusal to accept bigoted storytelling as fact, with my refusal to "consider" such crap.

I also find your characterization of my "extremely pro jewish narrative to be another total misconception. My narrative is ENTIRELY oriented to rejection of bigotry and its regurgitation of age old hateful memes and themes. Since you seem fixated on ethnic misconduct its not surprising that my rejection of your nonsense is considered typical by you.

 

Enough research? You think research results are judged on volume? I prefer hard evidence and truth.

Has enough research been done regarding the fact the earth is flat?

funny but it isn't me that has demonstrated a simplistic one dimensional interpretation of history. In this instance a history that has been thoroughly researched for at least 4 generations.

this is from post 42 from forumposter.