Creating the 'Hockey Stick' by eliminating cooling data and playing with inaccurate graphs is faux science.
You are not interested in serious. You are interested in advancing an agenda of denial and conspiracy theories. That only works on the feeble minded. I'd like to see you present your "findings" to a panel of climatologists and meterological experts. I imagine you'd wilt.
Scientists should run their data pass you to see if it qualifies as valid. Deniers are a funny bunch. Like point ans laugh at funny, but funny nonetheless.
Instead of displaying your prowess over Climate, you simply do your best to denigrate me. Were you good, you would stop insulting me and flex your climate muscles. - - - Updated - - - Well, blame your side. They can't prove man causes climate. If we caused climate, explain the great lakes and glaciers and why NY City was once ice covered. Explain the 3 past glaciers that carved Yosemite. Where the heck were humans?
I don't mean to insult, but what you call a source of information on climate is nothing more than an uneducated talking head who makes a living off of stealing ignorant people's money. I'll leave you to wallow in your conspiracy theories, I feel my intelligence being sapped away even engaging you.
Denier is the new heretic. Lefties use it in their pseudo-religion as a way to marginalize anyone who dare think outside the hive mind.
It sure is a shame. I challenge them to show us facts but they talk and talk and talk. Nothing but talk. [video=youtube;RZlICdawHRA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZlICdawHRA[/video]
It seems a shame that they keep accepting NOAA fiction. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-global-warming-slow-down-in-the-2000s-or-not/ - - - Updated - - - Don't fret over the sapping. It seems it never was there to begin with. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-global-warming-slow-down-in-the-2000s-or-not/
