Marrs proves that Oswald not only did not Kill Kennedy,but did not kill Tippet as wel

There was a shot which hit over the right eye. Mocking jokes for the sake of the reality. Alan Smith saw the President's forehead get hit with the bullet that killed him. That shot was fired by Greer.

33) Alan Smith---"…the car was ten feet from me when a bullet hit the President in the forehead…the car went about five feet and stopped." [Chicago Tribune, 11/23/63, p. 9; Murder From Within by Fred Newcomb & Perry Adams (1974), p. 71]; Kennedy's Limo Slowed After the Assassination Shooting Began

 

There was no shot over the right eye and bullets travel too fast to be seen.

The photograph you posted shows no bullet hole proving you wrong.

Mockjing is proof you have lost and resort to childishiness

 

Alan Smith saw it hit. The circled area over the right eye was the entrance wound.

 

SMith did not see it hit and the circled region is a minor drop of blood and not a hole of any kind

 

Greer fired the fatal shot and pointed over his right eye as the entry point.

 

Greer did not fire any shot.

There was no entrance wound over the eye

 

Did Alan Smith mistake the back of the head for the forehead, is that what you're saying?

 

Read what I said it is not ambiguous and one witness does not refute the evidence.

 

That's something that cannot be explained away when so many others including Dr. Humes, who removed bullet fragments behind the right eye.

 

Yes it can be in fact.

There were many witnesses and in such cases some always get it wrong.

Smith simply got it wrong.

 

He got it right. It's consistent with fragments being removed just behind the point of entrance, the right eye.

 

Nope he is wrong and all of the evidence proves it.

Frgaments behind the eye do not support him.

In fact if they were left there by a bullet which entered from the front his eye would be gone and it was not.

No entrance wound in the front destroys all of your claims. And proves Smith wrong

 

In fact if they were left there by a bullet which entered from the front over his right eye where two fragments were removed.

No entrance wound in the back destroys all of your claims. And proves Smith right.

 

There was an entrance wound in the back of his head and none in the front.

 

Was the hole on the rear an exit wound?

 

Answered already.

 

The hole was on the rear.

 

Yes an entrance hole

 

So, the big hole was an entrance wound and exit wound?

 

Answered with evidence already

 

Was the hole on the rear an entrance wound? If so, how is that possible? Show what page you posted the autopsy report? You posting nothing but nonsense.

 

I posted facts with evidence which you ignore.

 

somehow witnesses and what the dallas doctors say as well as the laws of physics mean totally NOTHING to him.only what the lamestream media and our government say matters.

- - - Updated - - -

you mean Marrs FACTS have never been proven by him or anyone else.

 

Yes I prved many of Marrs claims to be outright lies and you ran away for a few weeks to avoid the embarressment of addressing THAT fact.

The laws of physics do not oppose the fact proven by evidence that Oswald shot Kennedy.

The witnesses and Dallas doctors do not prove otherwise either

 

what a joke, he also said he had proof that aliens live here, among us

of course he didn't have any real proof, only a bunch of conspiracy theory malarkey