Martial Law Will Be Broader Than I Originally Expected

That last paragraph came from this same section in the link I provided:

​

 

We are seeing a PATTERN, as the PHILIPPINES ALSO has had to put army troops, yes army troops, on the street against Islam. These are not Muslim-majority hell-holes that are doing this, these are NON-Muslim-majority nations doing this! They don't have as many Muslims as nations will have in the future, so this situation will only get worse. CAIR and other Muslim groups offer no solution - their only solution is to work against the measures that reasonable people put in place to try to contain the Jihad.

 

Evidence that the Royal Crown considers the District of Columbia to be one of its "territories" is all over these documents and apparently, all it took was somebody working in a US Embassy, to keep it all together:

​

Timothy E. Deal, a Bush 41 appointee:

 

The link from US Social Security and the Queen of England is abundantly clear and the District of Columbia is considered a territory of England. Any doubters? Or, should we just write such connections off as mere tin foil mad hattery.

How can you go on knowing full well that you are not fully sovereign and that you are still under the control of the Crown?

 

Okay it is now time to move this to the wacky conspiracy theory section. Adios, au revoir, parting is such sweet sorrow ..... not.

 

A quick google search shows the agreement makes sure that U.S. citizens living in the U.K. get their benefits and visa versa. What do you think it means?

 

Primarily an urban problem, so primarily will effect liberals in their utopias, they are welcome to it...

 

What people "believe", especially the right, IS the problem. They "believe" that Mexicans are the problem, and that a Wall will solve it. They "believe" that Muslims are the problem, and banning them will solve the problem. And they "believe" that guns will solve their problems.

In 1929 this country figured out that Republican "beliefs" were the problem, and got rid of them for 40 years, and this country boomed until Nixon, Raygun, the Shrubs and Trump. And the national debt went from less than $1 trillion to almost $20 trillion with republican "beliefs".

And don't point your finger at Obama....He was digging us out of the collapsed economy that Shrub Jr. left him, and you know that's a fact too. Shrub left Obama with a $1,2 trillion deficit for Obama's first year, along with the collapsed economy....and a collapsed global economy too.

 

Oh come on man Hoover was as much of a progressive as Roosevelt. The only difference was that Hoover didn't believe he had constitutional authority, which he didn't, to do the stuff he wabted to do by law so he tried to do it on an ad hoc informal basis. And Sorry Bush didn't cause the problem and Obama didn't end it. The country was in the Doldrums when Kennedy took Office after running well to the right of Nixon. It wasn't Republican beliefs but Democratic spending, enabled by the Republican establishment, that drove the deficit. The economy was back in the crapper when Nixon took office and he tried every leftis quick fix their is from wage and price controls on down and they all failed. By the time Reagan's first budget began to take effect in late 1982, we had a misery index well into the thirties. Reagan's tax cuts combined with the much smaller regulatory state of the period produced not only the greatest economic growth since the Roaring '20s. but a doubling of federal tax receipts. Against that compare Obama's anemic 2% growth over 8 years marking the worst recovery in decades reflected in the lowest worker participation rate since WWII.

 

This looks like someone having a conversation with themselves.....