Mass Vaccinations Trigger a sharp spike in cases and deaths

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Eleuthera, May 17, 2021.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Seth Bullock

    Seth Bullock Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    Messages:
    13,625
    Likes Received:
    11,934
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,694
    Likes Received:
    11,760
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Today's doctors are trained and conditioned to follow various official narratives, generally described by Pharma. They are not conditioned or trained to be independent thinkers. The 'M' in MD stands for Medicine.

    They are taught to follow the dictates of pharma and government at the expense of the Hippocratic Oath. I guess that's why so many are administering the jab to their patients.

    Those urging caution are harassed by the various medical boards. It's a mess.
     
    Matthewthf likes this.
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf likes this.
  5. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf likes this.
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf likes this.
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf and Eleuthera like this.
  8. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf likes this.
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf likes this.
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf and Eleuthera like this.
  11. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/principia-scientific-international/

     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not in a position to know whether this is true or not. It may turn out to be true in which case this article would just be damage-control by some public-relations agency.
    https://www.politifact.com/factchec...s-deaths-were-not-connected-fake-news-websit/

    I never heard that the FDA said that but I've seen a lot of doctors saying that vaccines can cause serious harm.
    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-after-receiving-pneumococcal-vaccine.587131/

    I've never heard that a company that makes vaccines said that but doctors have been saying that on the internet.
     
    Matthewthf likes this.
  13. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf and Eleuthera like this.
  14. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Matthewthf and Eleuthera like this.
  15. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Cosmo likes this.
  16. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,280
    Likes Received:
    18,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As long as it triggers you probably indefinitely.
     
    Matthewthf likes this.
  17. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,280
    Likes Received:
    18,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why would there be wackadoodle's that lie what do they have to gain from it?

    What do you think someone is gaining by stating something with regard to covid that doesn't affirm byour particular belief?
     
    Matthewthf likes this.
  18. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It isn't aimed at me, so that is an absurd statement.

    Well duh. I refer you to the post of mine above - Mike Adams, who controls large swathes of alternative crap websites and who runs a business on crank medicines with crank claims. As long as he can generate distrust and controversy in the medical profession, he automatically sucks in eager clueless customers. Go and look at all of these doctors, none of whom are virologists most of them with sidelines and payment buttons on their crazy websites.
     
  19. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,280
    Likes Received:
    18,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're just saying people you don't like are cranks and that's just narcissism.

    Come at me when you can disprove things.
     
    Matthewthf likes this.
  20. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm saying it because the cranks who behave like cranks, spout crank nonsense and have crank websites are actually cranks. I have no like or dislike of them. It is nothing whatsoever to do with narcissism. Did you find a new word and didn't quite understand what it meant?

    Whoah there, you seem not to understand things here. I have no duty to disprove your, or any one else's idle claims or conjecture. YOU have the burden of proof.
     
    Cosmo and fiddlerdave like this.
  21. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,280
    Likes Received:
    18,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But you're just claiming it's crank nonsense because you don't like it. It isn't an argumentative proposition it's just an opinion.
    Thinking your opinion dictates what is it isn't "crank nonsense" is precisely what narcissism is.


    The attack on others to dodge supporting your claims is a classic narcissistic move.
    I didn't make a claim. You did.
     
    Eleuthera and Matthewthf like this.
  22. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're just claiming I don't like it. I have no idea why but it most certainly is bullshit. I'm saying it's nonsense because it has no verifiable citations, no corroborating evidence,
    and distinct and highly suspicious connections to money making websites and people.

    You're not very good at this are you. The source of the crank articles is the opinion, unsourced, uncited and generally unsound. Mine is the objective pointing this out.

    I strongly suggest you learn to read the description given to you from online dictionaries. You are completely clueless on understanding what the word narcissism means, what denotes an opinion (ie. the source material!) and what pointing out the deficiencies of that source material amount to.

    Since I am not doing that, it is actually neither. Once again you appear to be blundering along oblivious to what a simple word means, whilst being hopelessly inept at understanding the nature of debate.

    I made no claim, I observed that the claims I responded to lacked any credence by virtue of the items listed above.
     
    Cosmo likes this.
  23. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,280
    Likes Received:
    18,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Without evidence that it is crank nonsense, that is just your opinion that it is.
    How do you know magical elf tell you?
    That you are aware of. Still uninformed opinion unless you can produce your magical elf.
    Cherry picked of course.


    I'm holding my own here.
    You haven't proven anything to be crank articles.


    Standard personal attack from the losing position.


    Personal attacks... Yawn.

    False, you claimed that articles are "crank nonsense."
     
    Matthewthf likes this.
  24. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wow, this got tedious quick - in response to me stating I do not dislike something you come out with that non sequitur. I just gave evidence it is crank nonsense. The source of the crank articles is the opinion, unsourced, uncited and generally unsound.

    How do I know whether I like or dislike something? Shakes head, wonders how to get away from this.

    In every single sourced article it contains citations and corroborating evidence. There lies the area of best scientific practice. To suggest there actually IS citations, corroborating evidence, peer reviews etc. and I am unaware of it, is a colossally ignorant thing to say. The whole point of science is to back up what you write WITH all that. The objective being to come close to offering sufficient evidence to back up your claims!

    Well I didn't need it to determine whether I like or dislike something, so I still don't need it to comment on ACTUAL uninformed opinion and point out such.

    An absurd statement. I gave a website linking the owner of numerous websites, peddling this anti establishment crap with the root of it his "alternative" medicine for the hopelessly gullible. There is nothing cherry picked about a direct link to most of the articles being posted!

    Sure you are.

    And once again you fail to understand how things work. There lies the burden of proof in the claim that disputes cited, corroborated, peer reviewed evidence. It needs the same level of detail to at least challenge it. In effect, the crank articles are bare assertion with in some cases the appeal to authority.

    Bare assertion. You have shown quite clearly that you don't understand how things work.

    You think that is a personal attack? Identifying that you are making blunder after blunder is nothing of the sort, it observes your failure to understand basics.

    Then detailed why.

    Humans Are Free - RationalWiki

    READ THIS PAGE!!
    Mike Adams Is Building an Alternate Reality Online | Office for Science and Society - McGill University
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2021
    Cosmo likes this.
  25. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The peers who do the peer-review can be corrupt so the fact that a bunch of peers reviewed it isn't conclusive proof of anything.
    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...ht-kill-us-eventually.590227/#post-1072800266
     
    Matthewthf likes this.

Share This Page