Massie To Garland: Did Any Federal Agents Or Assets Enter The Capitol Or Incite Riot On January 6?

Subscribe to kook claims?

New York Magazine, MSNPC and The New Duranty Times are RW publications?

Some troof you've got workin' there....

Not at all. Massie did Pedo Joe's hack at the DOJ and the American people a favor by bringing the curious case of Ray Epps to everyone's attention.

Anyhoo, I guess it's good to know that federal agents were inciting the riot on 1/6 and the DOJ is investigating them, but that still doesn't explain why an individual directly involved in "the most dangerous threat to our democracy" has escaped arrest and prosecution in his "sweeping" probe. I guess he missed a spot.

 

They are?
Since when?
I hadn't heard about the ownership transfer.
I will Google it ASAP.

Totally DEBUNKED.
In case you missed it:

Sullivan is not a "known antifa member,"

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-antifa-member-jan-6-capitol-riot/5405679001/

You're welcome.

 

It's hilarious you're even asking that question.

LOL - You do that.

In the meantime you can keep pretending MSNPC and The New Duranty Times aren't LW propaganda bullhorns...

 

Great deflection from your absurdly misguided claim about the "Antifa Guy"

Totally DEBUNKED.
In case you missed it:

Sullivan is not a "known antifa member,"

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-antifa-member-jan-6-capitol-riot/5405679001/

 

Sure, like the Federalist, the N Y Post and American Greatness, gee can you get any more Liberal than the federalist?
The fact that you have to misrepresent such extremely radical Right-wing publications like the Federalist as "notorious LW nut job publications" only proves you know RCP is a GQP hack publication funded by GQP dark money.
Thank you!

 

The misrepresentations are ALL yours.

I never stated or suggested that the Federalist, NY Post and American Greatness are LW publications - I pointed out the fact that New York Magazine, MSNPC and The New Duranty Times are "notorious LW nut job publications" (Post #122).

The fact that you had to misrepresent what I posted proves you can't support your ridiculous claim that RCP is a hack RW site. The fact you thought you could get away with misrepresenting what I posted is an even bigger joke.

 

In other words, you STILL got nuthin'...

Anyway, was does that off-topic rant have to do with Massie and Garland?

Anyway, back on-topic to Massie.
The guy is obviously delusional.
Has a bad grudge against Garland, and on top of that he hates Israel.

In September 2021, Massie was the only Republican to vote against $1 billion of funding for Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system

 

As I have proven so many times before, when the Right get caught in an untruth, they simply cover their untruths with more untruths.
Here is the list of "Left wing nut job publications" you posted which included the Federalist!

 

The Constitution and Bill of Rights is NOT a dead horse and the person with I was having the conversations ran away from it in the previous thread when it could not be refuted.

Show me where a judge can send you to jail for a crime you did not commit and were not charged with and were given no opportunity to defend yourself.

 

By asking that question, you have shown that you completely misunderstood the sentencing hearing.

I have been over this several times.
One either gets it or they don't.

Further engagement on my part would be unneccesary and a waste of time.

Unlike some others, I have never been a fan of going around in circles, beating a dead horse, just to up my post count.

That said, I hope you find the answers that will lead to a greater understanding of the Judge's actions.
Best of luck and Godspeed.

 

As you proven many times in this thread, when you get caught in an untruth you simply cover your untruths with more untruths. Perhaps we should expand that to include that you have proven many times that when Leftists get caught in an untruth, they simply cover their untruths with more untruths.

Again with the untruths.

Reading Is Fundamental. Look at the big words in my post:

Wrap your brain around the difference between "a lot" and "all".

Furthermore, there remains the inconvenient fact that the only outfits I have singled out as "left-wing nut job publications" are New York Magazine, MSNPC, and The New Duranty Times.

I think we're done with your Foray of Failure, which has nothing to do with the subject of this thread.

 

Deal with my words not other words............


RealClearPolitics media bias rating is Center.
Center bias. RealClearPolitics' AllSides Media Bias Rating™ is weighted; its homepage content affects this rating by about 60%, as its homepage includes content curated from across the political spectrum. Content in RealClearPolitics' "Articles" section may display more of a Lean Right bias. Note: This Media Bias Rating reflects the bias of RealClearPolitics, not other RealClear sections such as RealClearInvestigations, RealClearEnergy, RealClearHealth, etc.

• July 2021 Independent Review: Fact Check Review Also Shares Center Bias
• Sept. 2020 Editorial Review: RCP Has Mostly Center Bias
• April 2020 Independent Review: RCP Has Center Bias
• AllSides Community Feedback
• Third-Party Claims of Bias
• Philosophy and Bias of RealClear Founders
• About RealClearPolitics
• Funding, Financing and Ownership

RealClearPolitics fact-checking section has a Center bias, according to a July 2021 independent review by AllSides staff.

Editorial Review of RealClearPolitics. Overall, readers will get a mixture of left-wing and right-wing views when visiting RealClearPolitics.com, so the site gets a Center bias rating; however, the team agreed that content on RealClearPolitics' "Articles" section has more of a Lean Right bias. During the Editorial Review, there was a general consensus among the AllSides team that RealClearPolitics' homepage of curated articles is very balanced, featuring an equal number of stories (typically, opinion pieces) from left-wing media outlets/writers and right-wing media outlets/writers. RealClearPolitics does not hide or obscure the left-wing or right-wing view, and displays content from both sides very equally. RealClearPolitics frequently showcases opposing views side-by-side. At the time of review, content from Elle Magazine (rated Lean Left at the time of review) appeared right next to content from The Federalist (Right); commentary from someone criticizing the Black Lives Matter organization appeared right next to a video of Bernie Sanders criticizing President Trump; an article about critical race theory activists "destroying STEM high school" (Asra Nomani, Quillette, Lean Right at the time of review) appeared right next to an article declaring "Telling the Truth About Slavery Is Not 'Indoctrination' (Clint Smith, The Atlantic, Lean Left); an article about "How Louisville Can Still Get Justice for Breonna Taylor (Travis Waldron, HuffPost, Left) appeared right next to a piece declaring "Breonna Taylor Grand Jury Simply Followed the Facts" (James Gagliano, DC Examiner, Lean Right at the time). AllSides rates the bias of as many individual writers that appear on RealClearPolitics as possible so that readers can more easily assess the bias of individual articles.


The New Yorker, CNN Opinion, The Federalist, The Nation, and the Washington Times.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/real-clear-politics

When you have something of merit to add let me know.

 

How does he know, he doesn't seem to know anything about anything else to do with the protest/riot. Can you cite him addressing Antifa and Jan 6?

 

"We're equal opportunity in looking for violent extremism of any ideology," FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday morning about the bureau's investigations since the deadly violence at the U.S. Capitol. "We have not seen, to date, any evidence of anarchist violent extremist or people who subscribe to Antifa in connection with Jan. 6."

Chris Wray

 

Can’t see much when you ain’t looking.

 

Out of the 12 publications you listed you could only find 3 Liberal pubs, 3 out of 12 is hardly a "LOT."
But keep piling on the untruths and proving me right!

 

Interesting. Many on the right said we don't need a committee to investigate Jan 6 because the FBI was adequate. Now the right says they aren't looking. So which is it?

 

Sorry confused your statement with Garland as he is the subject here.

 

It goes hand in hand. The right wing for months tried to pin it on Antifa. Then when that fell apart, they moved onto the FBI.

Let's say the FBI did attend the rally. Why would you reveal that right wing terrorists groups have been successfully infiltrated, and this goes for left wing groups too. Would you tell a country, "hey we have spies living in your country that have penetrated your government and terrorist network." Wouldn't that endanger the lives of agents?

It seems republicans are trying to root out potential moles in extremists groups.

Is there a single piece of evidence pointing to the FBI inciting the riot?

There's a lot of protection and pandering to extremists groups and it's disgusting.

 

I said I confused your comment about Wray's statement back in January about it, before the huge investigation that has been going on, and Garland giving testimony today and last week and I had not heard HIM say that. That is why I questioned. My mistake

And yes there are some questions about whether any FBI plants in these groups took part. Garland could have denied it that the FBI had any one there, unless he couldn't without blowing any covers. A question has been raised about this person in the videos that have been posted. Has he been arrested, who is he.

I don't put anything past this FBI when it comes to Trump I've seen enough of what they were involved, I don't give them any leeway. The best they could do would be to release ALL the evidence and be transparent. They have not been nor has the Capital Police.

 

You mean another congress critter clown show.

 

Dirtbag Garland has proved himself unfit for Supreme Court — but he shouldn’t be AG, or entrusted with any other federal position either.

Unfit for any Federal Office.​

"There was no justification for" Dirtbag "Garland’s move, which was political thuggery at its worst. The disorder at these meetings mostly involved people shouting and talking out of turn, with the occasional scuffle. (One arrest, at a meeting of the now-notorious Loudoun County, Va., school board, involved the father of a girl raped in a bathroom by a boy in a skirt — a rape the school board attempted to cover up. The boy has since been convicted.)"

But, it didn't work because no one is intimidated by these lying Dirtbags anymore. "The politicized Justice Department and FBI have become national laughingstocks due to their behavior of the past few years." The more that comes out about the Capitol protest the bigger the FBI and DOJ will again be shown to be dishonest dirtbags.

It's time for the GOP to resume the majority and clear all the Dirtbags.

 

Ray epps. He owns a wedding venue in Arizina, but its odd how Republicans are trashing their own due to paranoia. Any videos of this individual actually entering the capital? What would he be arrested for? Has anyone been arrested for inciting? Remember the legal barometer for inciting is very high as it must be balanced with first amendment rights.

Did he tell people to do X then Y after entering the capitol? If not his statements are very vague considering hundreds of people were doing it already on their own.

 

Then you will have to settle for the FBI because that's all that's needed.

"We don't need congress because the FBI is on it!"
*FBI can't find proof of antifa causing capitol riot*
"Deep state!"

Did I cover it?

 

Also no conspiracy.