This (OP) is how you fight abortion. ...not with restrictive laws that degrade the individual's sovereignty over their own body.
Partly by informing...... under-informed women who may eventually face the possibility of having an abortion.......... and hopefully of informing the fathers as well so that they also make more well informed decisions regarding pressuring the mother into having an abortion ....... or adoption...... or raising their child themselves.
What do you want them informed about? That YOU will give them $250,000 to raise the kid if they have it? How "under-informed" do you think women are that they don't know they have two choices, abortion or gestation?
Actually... I was thinking that the State of Utah..... perhaps in cooperation with my province Nova Scotia.... could in theory hire Mrs. Anne Romney..... to play the role of the White Horse First Lady....... and she could become arguably the ultimate example of Lioness Arising.... and yes..... it is theoretically possible for the White Horse President and his first lady to come up with two hundred and fifty thousand dollars for moms...... who decide to keep their babies....... becuause USA central banking policy is significantly smoke and mirrors..... a cruel joke on 326 million terribly under informed Americans......... who know almost as little as my own ancestors did back in the years 1750 - 1783....... as to what was really happening at the "top!" Among the elite capable of affecting central banking policy / Monetary Policy.... at that time.... and now in 2018! Do we Canadians owe America an apology for 1750 - 1783?
FoxHastings said: ↑ What do you want them informed about? That YOU will give them $250,000 to raise the kid if they have it? How "under-informed" do you think women are that they don't know they have two choices, abortion or gestation? WTF ? Do you READ the posts you respond to ? What has all that gibberish got to do with the post of mine you quoted ?
Yes, perish the thought of an unborn child surviving a medical procedure. If a woman has sovereignty over her own body, she won't let anyone inside it whose child she wouldn't be happy to bear.
A statement entirely ignorant of the fact that humans have an instinctual need to procreate regardless of whether their conditions make it logical or pheasible to do so. Humans arent machines. They make mistakes.
That is one of the silliest things any Anti-Choicer has said in here and that's saying something.. The idea that women should only have sex to breed strengthens my contention that Anti-Choicers want to lower women to the status of cattle. If a woman has sovereignty over her own body she sure doesn't have to care, or adhere to, what you think ….. Women have the power over life and death...and you don't....isn't that the real problem?
No reading comprehension issues, I just know your MO....and the post you quoted did say : ""These "survivors of abortion" are always pretty white women. What are the odds of that?"" No answer there from anyone...
Oh sure, look at all the people who die from failure to procreate. People have an instinctual need to eat, and an instinctual desire to copulate; and if they are in thrall to that desire, clearly they have no sovereignty, corporeal or otherwise. I wonder if you understand that. More to the point, Homo Sapiens is the only species that not only repeats its mistakes, but glorifies them so as to preserve the illusion of sovereignty.
LOL, well most people would consider this to be a blatantly obvious example of what’s referred to as a rhetorical question, but heck, I’ll play... Melissa was born in Iowa where 76% of abortions are committed against white unborn babies. Claire was In Oklahoma, where 61% of abortion’s are committed against white unborn children. Gianna was born in California, which doesn’t keep records of race in regards to abortion, but if we where to go by the national average it would be somewhere around 58%. I’m still waiting for you to back up your claims that “ women won’t be allowed to travel freely in their own country” I’m still waiting for you to back up your claims that “ pro lifers will cover every inch of state borders, slavering to inspect women that try to pass through” I’m still waiting for you to back up your claims that “ the government will be able to do anything that they want to a women’s body” And just for the record, my questions (the ones you constantly avoid), are not rhetorical.
In other words, pro-choicers say women don't want to be treated like animals but then turn around and claim they can't help themselves, because of their animal-like nature.
I don't see why these things wouldn't happen if abortion is banned... They would have to do these things if they want women caught and punished for murder!!!!!! Why ban something, make it illegal, IF the government isn't going to do anything about it??? Do you LIKE BIGGER government with no purpose??
NO, humans , women AND MEN act like humans, that is how humans , female AND MALE act.... I didn't say women were animals, it's Anti-Choicers think they are.. And again, your comment is so illogical as to be in another universe..
I was assuming that what you said reflects who you are, which, if you were being honest, it does. If you are such an elitist, I'll happily disregard you as an unreasonable fringe minority.
More accurately, you didn't like what I said, but couldn't find fault with it to save your life; so, true to your pharisaical inclinations, you contrived a fault in me to divert attention from what I said. Then presumably I'll no longer find my Alerts graced with any quote notifications from you, so happy trails.
