Men/Women are 1 Soul

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Til the Last Drop, Oct 15, 2017.

  1. Til the Last Drop

    Til the Last Drop Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    9,069
    Likes Received:
    384
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I turn 40 years old here soon, and have been a bachelor my whole life.
    I was raised by a single mother, a sister, a grandma, and 2 aunts.
    Of course, I was "taught" by the female dominated public school system.
    And since that means I dropped out, I had to have jobs around females my whole life.

    Whether wanting or not, my entire life has been an experiment.

    I truly believe that men and women are half of a solid soul, and if you wanted to destroy a nation, you would make them think otherwise.

    What is the best way to do this?

    What if you could change language in a way that would make a logic oriented sex incapable of honest communication with an emotional sex? Stripping them of ever being a whole, all the while, you and yours never stray from the old ways you know are true?

    This will not seem as if its a political post. But I promise you, this is the very heart of it all.
    Even if it just helps you to be happy on a personal level, it was worth posting.


    ---
    I have come to the conclusion that women don't consider a man to have "feelings" for them unless he's possessive.

    You can be romantic, passionate, sexy, kind, caring, sensitive - or any of their antonyms. The question is, in what way are you expressing these emotions?

    Only possession will make that realization set in.

    Examples:

    Kindness:
    1. A back massage. Non-possessive.
    2. Offering to pay her water bill she's "sad about". Possessive.

    Why then does she even waste time acting sad around the man whom she's around only through her own efforts?

    Anger:
    1. Throwing a wrench at a wall because she made fun of you. Non-possessive
    2. Throwing a wrench at a wall because she looked at the other guy. Possessive.

    Why then would a "flight if feelings" type force you to be in situations where you have to fight for her to keep her?
    Is this a passive aggressive form of "scared of commitment"?

    Or is this the war between evolution and social engineering waging in the soul of every modern woman?

    I'll use the "get the milk for free" analogy to keep a common denominator.

    Social engineer an evolved farmer, capable of logic, and you get wives who can go to work and daughters who can got to college.

    Social engineering a cow is to destroy the cow, and its limited known resources of survival - that took thousands of years to program. The cow no longer knows how to eat grass - so you could have it play the trumpet.

    The cow must be able to grasp logic in order for social engineering to be of benefit.

    Sadness:
    1. Disappointment over not being able to see her on her terms. Possessive.
    2. Disappointment over not being able to see her on your terms. Non-possessive.

    You invite her out and she can't make it and you're bummed about it. Non-possessive
    She says she wants to come over and then has to cancel and you're mad. Possessive.

    Sadness is the trickiest one to wrap one's head around, hence the tradition of avoiding it at all costs around a female.

    But on a 'Hannibal Lector pimpin' level, an omega male still lapping in the depredation of carnal sin could use this to his advantage to achieve serious levels of emotional manipulation.

    ----

    Possession equaling "he has feelings for me" in the brain of a female isn't applicable here and there. This is a rule.

    I could, as I'm sure many, list off the 50 obvious ways this realization could help you fight the biological programming of evolution to optimize levels of omega type manipulation. Lets go deeper.

    Do women know this?
    Do men?

    And if we don't know this, do we have free will?

    The animal we grew from knew this on a programming level. The programmer being nature. And on that level, it was robotic.

    Either at some point when we were turning grunts into language we misconstrued our own organic wants, or after language had been developed, someone came along and started playing with definitions, using culture control to implement a way to strip of us being able to communicate our very own evolved programming of personal understanding. Basically, they stripped men and women of the common denominator that allowed their hearts to communicate.

    Men must regain a working knowledge of what "feelings" truly are for women in order for us to regain their hearts.

    Whether they want us to stay - or they want us to go.


    Til the Last Drop
    Nationalist Capitalist
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2017

Share This Page