Microbiologist: "They are Killing People with these COVID Vaccines" to Reduce the World's Population

As usual, you have nothing of substance to reply with regarding this topic.

 

without the vaccine, many many more would have died, thus if the goal was to reduce the population, they failed

 

~ Sadly there is more evidence being exposed that this may actually be true. However network "news" omits any of this information. This could be an experiment that backfired unexpectedly and governments must do what they always do — cover-up and mislead the public .

" The worst is yet to come ... "

 

Whatever their agenda, the bottom line is that ALL vaccines are toxic & have killed vastly more than has been reported. The following research (PDF) illustrates details about the VAERS data that most people are not aware of.

Vaccine Death Numbers - Evidence of millions of deaths and serious adverse events
resulting from the experimental COVID -19 injections
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/en/vaccines/vaccinereport.pdf

 

the vaccines have been given to millions around the world, it's proven to be safe and effective

 

Among other notable whistleblowers, you should really listen to Dr. Suzanne Humphries. Vaccines have never been demonstrated to be safe, nor effective.

 

the anti-vax stuff is getting old, millions worldwide have had the vaccine, they have demonstrated to be safe and effective

but if you want an old fashioned vaccine, looks like one coming out

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/t...me-in-weeks-11653578153?mod=mw_more_headlines

 

It appears you repeat the propaganda as well as you absorb it. Not much to be proud of there....

 

From "stop world control dot com"?

Where do you guys find this crap?

 

Well there's some irony...

 

the facts are the facts, your argument might have worked right after the vaccine was released, but not now

 

It's an expose of the under-reporting of vaccine injuries/deaths.

Did you even review it? If so, are you refuting the data & whistleblower/insider testimonies presented (not including the "conspiracy" stuff near the end)?

And did you seriously expect to see this posted on such sites as the CDC, NIH, FDA, the WHO, pharmaceutical sites, or even CNN/FOX News/MSNBC/BBC/etc?

I'd also like to ask, where do you get your medical information from? From organizations that promote & benefit from the sale of vaccines/medical drugs and medical equipment/supplies?

You may also look up the following sources which keep track of Covid-19 adverse reactions:
* OpenVaers (US)
* EudraVigilance (EU)
* Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)
* Yellow Card (UK)

Further reading...

Federal Govt Whistleblower Goes Public with Secret Recordings: ‘Government Doesn’t Want to Show the [COVID] Vaccine is Full of Sh*t’; ‘Shove’ Adverse Effect Reporting ‘Under the Mat’

 

Actually, the pro-vax (and "germ theory") stuff is what's getting really old.

The world's populations have been forced to endure these toxic cocktails, and have suffered & been killed by them for generations (not to mention their long-term adverse effects like auto-immune diseases, autism, irreparable neurological damage, etc.).

The anti-vax stuff isn't going away for one single reason: vaccines are a deadly poison to the body, without exception. The growing vax skepticism is a step in the right direction. Sometimes it takes a long time, but the truth ultimately finds its way through the fog of BS.

 

the real cause of those things is metabolic disease which is caused by a high carb, low fat diet

antibiotics and vaccines are real proven science

 

It's a conspiracy theory from a conspiracy theory site. Nothing more.

 

~ For more "conspiracy " check out the Pfizer records and data just released.
There is a reason that groups of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force release of documents related to licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.

 

Twaddle.

 

Facts that frighten you, so you describe facts and data as Twaddle. Cognitive dissonance in full bloom.

 

Conspiracy theories do not frighten me. Simply put they annoy me as they do anyone with a smattering of intelligence.

 

Yes, it's pretty clear that you positively adore Official Conspiracy Theories.

It's the facts and evidence that contradicts those Official Theories that repels you.

 

Twaddle

 

The future mutations become less lethal, as we see with the current one. A "vaccine" or in this case, and "anti viral" mRNA shot can be designed to induce certain behavior in the host. If that behavior remaps, say antibody production to always be X, and doesn't allow the body to react in another way, future infections would make the host vulnerable. The pioneer and likely inventor of mRNA modifications has made this point. The OP is making this point.

There are a lot of very rich folks who think they are "helping" by creating policy, methods to significantly reduce human populations. Folks, like Bill Gates have stated as much publicly.

What is the moral thing here? Some say they understand and can effectively manage populations. Does that make it moral for them to do so? If self determination is a natural right, can folks who think they know best be trusted not to F up? And does it make sense to allow them to have this kind of power over so many they can't ever know?

 

Metabolic disorders are caused primarily by non-native electricity (electric fields & wireless radiation). The adverse health effects of electric fields have been observed since the days of the telegraph. Exposure to electric fields compromises the body's ability to metabolize fats, sugars, and proteins. And this occurs at the mitochondrial level. As an additional result, oxygen starvation/hypoxia is a common adverse effect of electricity, leading to both respiratory & cardiac disorders (which underlies the epidemic of chronic fatigue). Interestingly, cardiac symptoms, such as heart palpitations, shortness of breath & pain/pressure in the chest are used in diagnosing "anxiety disorder". And acute "anxiety attacks" can resemble a heart attack.

Thus, despite the growing interest & shift towards healthier dietary & lifestyle changes, diseases such as diabetes, obesity, and heart disease continue to skyrocket. Many people have had to resort to a restrictive "keto" diet just to survive these metabolic disorders. Our bodies could easily handle fats, sugars, and proteins if we didn't have to contend with the persistent effects of electric fields & wireless radiation.

Electricity is also a major cause of neurological, bone, muscle, and mental disorders, as well as cancer and all the major "flu epidemics" since the expansion of telegraph lines.

Vaccines, medical & recreational drugs, pesticides, GMO's, artificial food additives, over-processed foods, municipal water additives/contaminants (fluoride, VOC's, pharmaceuticals, etc.), plastics, man-made environmental contaminants, and stress only add to the assault of electricity.

 

lol, sure ok, it's not the high carb\low fat diet, it's the electricity in our homes

funny the issue against speed when the government dietary recommendations came out in the 1980's

 

If a high carb/low fat diet was so bad, billions of people would've experienced rampant diabetes, heart disease, obesity, neurological diseases, weak bones, and mental disorders long before the industrial/electrical age.

With the exception of Inuit tribes with very limited food choices, in no region or culture in any part of the world has a keto diet existed. In every traditional diet lasting thousands of years the staple has always been some kind of starch (eg, rice, yams, potatoes, grains, etc.). With this comes an assortment of veggies, fruits, nuts and, when available, some animal protein & fat.

So tell me, why have the world's people suddenly become stricken with an epidemic of metabolic disorders shortly after the introduction of electricity without any change in diet? Why do many now find that they must revert to a high-fat/low-carb keto diet just to normalize blood-glucose levels, lose weight and reverse heart disease? (Note: Many also have converted to a vegan, raw vegan, or vegetarian diet for the same purpose.)