Despite the fact this is an example of yet another Liberal attempting to cloud the issue - a form of logical fallacy in a debate - I'll address your claim. Since when has the Right ever advocated against the natural right for innocent persons not to be killed? Or is this yet another absurd mis-logic coming from danielpalos?
There'd still be a sign WARNING them what would happen if they crossed that fence and entered across no-man's land; just like there's a sign warning women what can happen if they take it up the vag and get inseminated (they can make a baby).
