Topic says: Moon landing (singular), but there were three Moon landings (plural) So the 'Moon landing conspiracy' is made up (by whom is the question, for what reason too, but clearly ideological, all comes from this system and it's mass media/propaganda) That would be the 'Moon landings conspiracy', because if one was fake then all three landings must have been faked by the same logic, but the facts proof all three Moon landings happened, also the multiple other landings (landers, rovers and probes) on many celestial bodies happened and are currently happening (why should only one Moon landing be faked and all ofther space explorations and launches and space technology not?) If humans can live in the ISS for a year a man could also walk around on the Moon for a couple of hours per day. Tens of thousands saw the rockets being launched (in reality) from Cape Canaveral, FL, and so on.
The difference between the two cases is probably the level of radiation that's under the Van Allen belts and that that's in and beyond the Van Allen belts. There's some alternative info on space radiation at the bottom of this list of info. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&p=4001964&viewfull=1#post4001964 The anomalies in the video prove the missions were faked. Now we just have to figure out why they had to fake them. I think space radiation is the most likely explanation.
Hate to break it to you, but there wasn't three lunar landings. There were six. If they were faked, each would involve hundreds, if not thousands of people and run many risks of being exposed. It might be possible to fake one for a while, but six? No way. As for Scott's absolutely retarded claims about radiation, they have been disproven time and time again. I would have to find it, but at one point Scott's claim would require a six foot lead shield to protect the astronauts! How, then, does Scott account for the Russian Zond program which successfully put animals into orbit around the moon before bringing them back to Earth unharmed?
There's some info on how information is controlled in this post. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&page=37&p=4731597&viewfull=1#post4731597 The anomalies show the missions were faked. There are several plausible scenarios that would explain why they were faked. I just think space radiation is the most likely one.
You can keep repeating your lies as much as you want. Nobody is buying it despite your ridiculous claims. So how do you explain the fact there were six moon landings? Why risk it all over again and again and again and again and again if it was all fake and it only takes one mistake to screw up the whole conspiracy? You can't even defend your supposed "anomalies", much less give a real common sense answer that exposes your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) for what it is.
I don't understand your logic here. If radiation would prevent us from going through the VA belts, then it would prevent everyone else, too. Thus it would have put an end to the "race to the moon", and we wouldn't need to fake it, because the Russians weren't going to beat us there.
The real conspiracy, to me, is not whether we went to the moon but the cancellation of several missions and whether they were truly cancelled. The larger overall conspiracy with NASA is their supposed knowledge of extraterrestrial life.
What 'anomalies'? You are aware that moon kooks' perceived anomalies are perfectly explainable without resorting to some hoax theory, right?
These anomalies. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&p=4001964&viewfull=1#post4001964 Explain these anomalies from the above list. ------------------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymwE1sNm82Y (If this link doesn't work, do a YouTube search on "Apollo 15 flag waving") At the 2 minute 35 second mark of the video the flag is still. When the astronaut goes past it, it starts to move even though he's not close enough to have touched it. Air made it move so they were obviously in a studio. ------------------------- ----------------------------------- Watch how the corner of Collins' jacket moves in this clip. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fqdB1b53jc (00:52 time mark) The corner of Collins' jacket swings back and forth the way it would in gravity. Look at the corners of the jacket the woman astronaut is wearing in this clip. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4 That is real zero-gravity and they behave quite differently. The movement of Collins' jacket corner is very different from that of the straps in this clip which is in zero-G. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ofwzby1c7o (3:17 time mark) It looks the same as the movement of this guy's jacket corners in gravity. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTNGNW5Evs4 One possible explanation is that they were trying to fake zero-gravity in a diving plane and the plane wasn't diving fast enough at that point. ------------------------------------
Before I put in a bunch of effort that's likely to be wasted, please read through http://www.clavius.org - do your homework. Then, if you still have questions/concerns, ask them here specifically and tell us what you have found or not found about it and why you're not satisfied with it. I'm sending you back to elementary school here.
The Clavius site is a government damage control site and all the pro-Apollo posters on its forum know the moon missions were faked. Here's a discussion about that. http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=125628 I'm the OP on that thread.
a;ll I saw was you getting your ass handed to you by the other posters scott/cosmored/fatty88/david c.....apparently they are as sick of your unsubstantiated spam as we all are
This guy is trying to sway those viewers who don't take the time to read the thread by misrepresenting what happened there. I urge all viewers to actually read it before deciding who was right.
How arrogant of you scott/cosmored/fatty88/david c.....I read your drivel,and it's the same old spam you keep posting. And I leave it to the other posters......did I misinterpet anything in scott/cosmored/fatty88/david c's post?
It was put together by Jay Windley (as I recall his name), and is full of good information that easily debunks a long list of silly hoax claims. Since your response is to automatically attack the site and dismiss what it says, I can only assume I was right that I would be wasting my time and effort to address your list of "anomalies." Hoax declaimers' "anomalies" are the product of bias and ignorance. I think it's sad that you shut your mind off to discovering things about moon and space because you're hell-bent on believing in a conspiracy. How unfortunate for your intellect to be so wasted.
This thread shows that Jay Windley and the rest of the posters on the Clavius forum know as well as the hoax-believers that the moon missions were faked. http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=125628 I urge the viewers to actually take a look at the posts on that thread before passing judgement. These guys are trying to sway those viewers who don't take the time to look at the discussion.
No. By lying about what happened on the thread. The people who take the time to look at it will know you're full-of-it. The people who just read threads without clicking on any links won't know who's version of what's in the links reflects reality. Some of those people may be swayed by rhetoric. Some of the younger viewers may simply believe the side that has the best rhetoric. Misrepresenting what's in a link to sway those who don't take the time to click on it and look at what's really there is a tactic that should be added to this list. http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222
Hate to break it to you, scott, but they're right and no matter how butthurt you are over the truth, the truth remains the same. You lie on a constant basis and this latest post is no exception. A good example of your constant and deliberate lying is proclaiming that nobody who reads your crap could help but be convinced you're correct.... yet not one person has ever come forward to proclaim you are right. Not ONE. How can that be? Oh right. You lie your ass off to promote your bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
You lied when you said this on page 2. Anyone who actually reads the thread will see that they have strong attitudes and weak arguments. I urge the viewers not to be swayed by the rhetoric of the pro-Apollo posters here and to actually read this thread and decide for yourselves. http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=125628
So you're going to claim LoneStrSt8 lied about his own opinion? WOW! I knew you had a huge, overblown ego, but (*)(*)(*)(*)! Claiming someone is lying about their own opinion as if you actually know what the opinion really is is a clear sign of an out of control ego and a childish need to feel right about something.... ANYTHING at least once. It doesn't look good, Scott. Not at all. Why won't you address your own lies like the claim nobody could read your crap and be unconvinced, yet not one person has ever been convinced by your crap? Seems to me you should be more concerned about your own dishonesty rather than lying your ass off about the opinions of others.
I would urge the viewers to review all available information and arguments about the hoax claims and the reality of the Apollo missions before making any decisions, and to still be open to changing their minds also once they have already made a decision, regardless of what that decision is. Don't ignore information for the sake of a belief. Let the facts speak for themselves.
