More European Countries Refuse Migrants

The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia have said they have had enough migrants and are shutting their doors.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ungary-slovakia-refusing-eu-imposed-migrants/


Of course these are Eastern European countries, that do not have the money and job opportunities like Western Europe. But I am thinking it might not be two or three decades until the West becomes equalized with the Eastern half of Europe.

 

The question is, why is Western Europe still taking those gypsies? They are nothing but trouble.

 

Granny says, "Dat's right - we got more dan any other country...

World has 258 million international migrants: UN
Wed, Dec 20, 2017 - CONTRIBUTION: The US hosts the largest number of migrants with 49.8 million and, without migrants, the population of Europe would have declined, a UN report said

 

Blimey I'll bet the lefties here will throw a self-righteous wobbly at that!

 

Because the alternative is killing them.

 

Well, then I suggest they keep it in their pants and stop having 6-7-8-9 children and later on wonder how to feed them. Or may be just use a condom.
It's their fault their countries are ****-holes. Perhaps you would like to see the West turn into a oriental ****-hole as well?

 

Taking in the gypsies is what is killing us.

Good, that means they're not stupid, at the opposite of western Europe.

 

I catch you killing immigrants and I'll put you down like a dog in the street. I will not blink.

You have identified a problem but you have not discovered a cure that isn't worse than the disease.

 

You send them back in their countries or you get partnership with african countries so they keep them.

 

Tell ya what, if immigrants come to my country and try to take it over, I'll be only happy to put them downby the thousands. And I would not blink an eye!

Their problem is for them to solve, not take over infidel's countries.
But hey, that is what their Holy (?) book teaches them.
To each their own.

 

Immigrants have come to your country.
But you haven't killed any of them.

Since that is exactly what we already do, the problem has been addressed to your satisfaction?

People are remarkably hard to control.

 

No, a lot of them stay on the french ground unfortunately, it provoked death of innocents.

 

I think in the end you have to accept practical realities.
There will be immigration. There always has been. People won't do as you tell them if it is not in their best interests.
Prisoners will escape prisons. Where there is a will there is a way.

So immigrants will head to safety. And the only way you can prevent this is to make it more dangerous for them in your country than it is in theirs.
At which point, who is the biggest medieval society of hate? To win that game, it has to be yours.

 

There are plenty of 'useful idiots' lefties who would.

 

But not on this scale and at this intensity. There's the difference.

 

I'm not against immigration, I'm against illegal immigration and most of muslim immigration. Some countries have already shown you can prevent undesired immigration. You have to show firmness.

About prisoners will escape prisons, nobody escape ours prisons for years, the only way to try to escape is permission.

You have to show to illegal migrants that they're criminals and invaders, I don't speak of shooting them, but treating them harshly.

 

Fascism then!

 

You're paying your internet by words your writting on it or you're to lazy and not respectfull enough to write full sentences to the people you're trying to communicate ?

 

I'm not a fascist. If you want to pretend otherwise, please try

 

I was not pretending you were a fascist, and never it was my intention, I don't even know you. I was pretending that you weren't actually trying to communicate.

 

Think more. You support fascism

 

Yes and I eat babies on a daily basis too. Do I support an authoritarian governement ? No. My ideal is more the swiss democracy than Mussolini Italy or Pinochet Chili.

 

Actually Pinochet had it right, but I'd better not go off topic.

 

Then how is one supposed to take this phrase? Firstly removing the hyperbole, illegal immigrants generally go through a process established by law which allows them to either leave on a voluntary basis or go through a legal process in order to establish their claim as to whether they can stay or should ultimately leave. This process takes a little time so during this process you are suggesting they should be hashly treated, waterboarded, fed on bacon and made to listen to Luc Abrogast albums? Or at what point in their process should they be abused and how should they be abused?