Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Scott, Jan 21, 2016.
It doesn't concern me in the least.
Translation: If I agree with Betamax's analyses*, I'll look silly so I can't do that but I can't disagree with him either so I'd better avoid the issue.
Your avoiding the issue makes you look silly too.
No, the translation is.
It doesn't concern me in the least.
I am not the least bit interested in your insane theories.
There comes a point when the most obvious things you can present are put in his face and he still denies them. There are a number of possibilities:
He is either investing in some money making venture associated with his crazy claims.
He is an obsessive forum troll.
He is quite mad.
I favour 3 at the moment.
I lean toward 2 and 3.
Heavy on 3
Nobody look as mad as you! You've completely outdone yourself in the past few days. Clear evidence that your spacewalk in water and dust free jump have been destroyed. You simply have nowhere to go. You will now attempt to bury them and I will not let you do that. I will "thwart you".
You are the archetypal Monty Python Black Knight, laughed out of the debate hall and your success rate is zero in everything you do, accept breathing.
Considering that it took the Russians 6 tries before they even HIT the moon! --- China is WAY more advanced... In fact, here is their latest model of the three stage rocket that will take them to the moon:
no ... I believe it's number 1 as evidenced by his constant posting and posting and posting of the same old debunked 9/11 vids ... these is money in clicks ...
I don't believe that Scott believes in his own bullshit as he buys into every silly conspiracy theory always backed by vids without an original thought .... also, he doesn't use internet cafes as he claims ... the economics do not add up for how long and the frequency he has been doing this ...
although different in style, he reminds me of another prolific conspiracy poster well known, that I cannot remember the name of (dammit) that claims the government is out to get him ... all over many forums ... someone help me here ...
The video in post #1 that went offline is back. Here it is.
Physics of the Apollo Moon Walk
Appalling spam - also reported.
Previous answer from years ago!!
Another totally inept video with a whole list of ignorant observations:-
1. His first point is that in the Apollo 11 DAC video "there is no evidence of lunar gravity". That is because this is a sequence of frames taken every 1 second and put together! Such ignorance.
2. His second observation is that they are walking upright all the time. What complete bullcrap. We can see quite clearly that they are leaning forward almost the entire time. If we look at the actual video footage, and pictures, this is even more obvious. The elevation of the camera doesn't help.
3. Idiotic observation number two, again looking at this series of spliced photographs is that there is no loss of balance etc. Well, maybe they spent hours and hours on harnesses and in 1/6th gravity flight airplanes, during the exhaustive training routine.
We then have nothing but patronising crap "educating us" about center of gravity until 7.40. Followed by a claim that the weight of the PLSS was more than the published figures because of the weight of liquids and battery. That is incorrect. The total weight of all consumables is included in the final 120lbs figure. He arrives at a figure of 180lbs total for just the PLSS which is a complete fabrication. Any total would include the spacesuit (34kg) as well, which is NOT on his back and further adds to his total vertical centre of gravity.
That seems to be enough. If you put it on half speed, it looks just like movements on Earth. What exactly are we missing because it's only a frame per second?
It gives no indication of the terrain and the orientation from the LM
No it doesn't and what moronic world do you live in where motion is accurately captured the way this footage was?
You tedious joke. You answer your own question. And YOU are not a we!
YOU miss everything because you are a layman in every subject and refuse to be educated by people who know 50 times more than you.
You must have taken a degree in irritation because you are so good at it. You post a link that answered your spammed crap nearly five years ago! Get a life, find another "hobby" - are you paid to do this - they should ask for their money back.
You've already shown yourself to be a sophist.
Nobody who sees some of your lame explanations for obvious clear anomalies is going to take your word on anything.
You are an ignorant spamming layman who is dishonest. You have shown this on virtually every single post you make.
You are not the spokesperson for others concerning your own inept and ignorant claims. There are no "clear anomalies" - there are simple explanations for your incredible gullibility.
There are lots of clear anomalies.
There's a ton of evidence that the missions were faked and zero evidence that they were real.
There are no clear anomalies.
Do shut up spammer.
Here's why NASA pays PR agencies to obfuscate the anomalies in the Apollo footage.
Click here on the bottom of that page.
Lunar Geology and Ionising Radiation
Having maintained its Apollo hoax for half a century, NASA is faced with two options. The first
option is to admit the hoax, be denied any further funding and be dissolved. Among further
measures, any Apollo participants or organisers still living should be stripped of all scientific,
academic and military honours, and all their pensions and other benefits revoked. Any perpetrators
of on-going NASA hoaxes should resign forthwith. Any and all scientists who wasted their time
and energy working on fabricated Apollo data or fake lunar specimens should sue NASA
accordingly. Planetary scientists will have to acknowledge that fifty years of research has been
corrupted to the point of uselessness by NASA's false data and specimens. All scientific works
using Apollo data, and all NASA publications on the missions will need library reclassification.
Review committees comprising non-NASA personnel should be established to oversee the
bankruptcy of NASA in every sense – political, scientific, legal and financial – and establish
whether there is anything at all salvageable from NASA's legacy. From the detritus – from the flyash
– something better could in time emerge. That's the first option.
The imbeciles at the Aulis money making site, feeding off morons and gullible conspiracy theorists. You are well at home there. I have a line for you taken from another forum - you are so very easy to follow, leaving faeces wherever you go:-
"It's possible that your sites are genuine and it's possible that some public-relations agency created them to help fool the public. Something that may or may not be bogus can't be used as proof."
Showing quotes out of context or with no context is a classic tactic that disinfo agents* use to distort what a person was saying. Please link to the whole post so that we can see the referred to sites.
The quote was in perfect context. It was made by you on another forum. YOU used it to dismiss evidence presented to you. Clearly yet another of your disinfo and dishonest tactics, since you make zero attempt to hold your own idiotic websites accountable to the same "standard". Aulis is a money making website designed to suck money from gullible and stupid people who cannot take time to verify, that everything they say is either a lie, a deliberate omission, blatant stupidity or irrelevant.
I believe you qualify in both categories and you possess the very helpful attribute of being able to dismiss without reason, every thing that dismantles that useless website. Their whole website is bogus, so cannot be used as proof. Your words.
There is no context. The only thing there is the quote. If you remember where you found it, please link to the page of the forum and the post number so that we can see the context.
Sure there is. You were given some links concerning transmissions received by amateurs and you gave that moronic dismissal. Kind of like an ad hominem for a website!
From you and a stupid one too.
Who is "we"? Find it yourself jackass, you said it on one of your other spam sites.
If you know where it is, why would you hesitate to post the link to it? It would probably take me over an hour to find it. I googled the quote between quotation marks and nothing came up.
I think it will be obvious that you were trying to distort what I was saying if we see the quote in its original context. That's why you won't show us where you found it.
Here's a question for you. How do you keep an idiot in suspense? I find it both sad and laughable that you the comedy troll hasn't worked out where you left your mess.
Separate names with a comma.