Mueller indictments prove Trump won fair and square.

Time for libs to come up with a new boogeyman..........Russia "collusion" didn't work out to well.



The very good news for the president is that the indictments are firm in saying that any Americans contacted by the 13 charged Russians, including Trump campaign associates, did not know they were dealing with Russians.

The indictments also state forcefully that despite their social media efforts, which ranged from creative to clumsy, the Russians had no impact on the election results.'''


https://nypost.com/2018/02/16/russian-indictments-prove-trump-won-fair-and-square/

 

Everyone's pretty well conceded on "collusion" ... "Meddling" nice and ambiguous ... that's the new buzzword. Frankly, we might as well compare US super-PAC's to the Russian FB trolls Mueller indicted. Laughable.

 

The whole Russia line was made up to excuse Hillary's 1.2 billion dollar campaign loss. The only people dumb enough to believe it are brainwashed liberals and the Russian trolls who jumped at the chance to feed their dilutions.

 

Hopefully we can finally put the RussiaRussiaRussia hysteria to bed.

The comparison above of our super PACs vs Russian FB trolls was pretty apropos.

 

The only people who "conceeded on collusion" are the same people who denied it in the first place.

Collusion remains on the table.

We are still waiting to see what hte Mueller probe may find regarding the infamous Trump Jr meeting (and the possibility of other such meetings that the public does not know about yet), why Don Jr took $25000 from a Russian backed Syrian front group to speak in Paris before the election, what went on with Jared Kushner's repeated attempts to thwart US foreign policy by trying to set up secret back channel communications with Russian intelligence, whether Carter Page or Flynn were the Trump campaign officials that were discussed in the current Mueller indicatment, or who those individuals might be, what involvement did the Trump campaign have with the Wikileaks e-mail dumps of DNC material obtained by Russian hackers, and what role Roger Stone played in that. We also don't know that role the Russians played with Cambridge Analytica. And we have seen no public discussions regarding Trump's financies and his long history with Russian money launderers and oligarchs.

We will see all of these things, in due course.

But enjoy your wishful thinking! You've been saying "case closed" for months now.

And you wish has yet to come true.

 

Ever notice that the only people still talking about Hillary Clinton's loss are Trump and Trumpsters?

 

Keep the faith!

 

No I didn't notice that. You're posting about it. Libs are still talking about how crooked Hillary ran a billion dollar campaign and still managed to lose a fixed election.

 

Kinda have too. Her campaign came up with the Russia lie to excuse their 1.2 billion dollar campaign loss. Doesn't your hero, the most prepared person ever to run, deserve credit for the Russia lie?

Are you a believer? Did Russia hack the election with a handful of ads and cost Hillary her landslide?

 

What's interesting here is that Mueller is going after Russians who placed ads - something any one of us could do - which would violate our own 1st Amendment if he was going after Americans. While I do not want any outside influences on our elections, it's our own media who does the most influencing. It was our own media who pushed the narrative that Trump is a racist, a homophobe, etc, and the low info voter ate it up.

Personally, I like to see news outlets fined and have their license put in jeopardy if they KNOWLINGLY report bogus news regarding political candidates because the only point in knowingly reporting bogus news would be to influence the minds of the voters. Off the top of my head, the "Romney didn't pay any income taxes' should have been a wake up call for us to do this years ago.

 

You're right if your mind is slow enough to believe the New York Post over the legal indictment.

 

The collective acts like the internet is only for Americans and foreigners that support them. After that, free speech stops.

 

And so has your wishful thinking have yet to come true....

 

I'm posting in response to you.

And you don't have to look far on this forum to see that the only people still talking about Hillary Clinton are Trumpsters. That's obvious.

Of course, you're dishonestly trying to pretend otherwise. Pathetic.

 

I will. It has proven so far.

 

Like the Republicans and Benghazi, the Democrats overplayed their hand with the "Russian collusion" meme. OTOH, as the indictments start flowing, obviously there were a few things amiss. This isn't over, but I doubt the Democrats will see Trump forced to resign over this.

 

Oh really the investigation ended?

 

Wrong. There has been no Trump/Russia collusion proven. These indictments say just the opposite, in fact.

 

They talk about her like she was president and had tons of influence or something I don't understand where they are getting it, Alex Jones and his huge red face must be working overtime.

 

For those particular indictments, has nothing to do with the scope of the entire investigation. Trumpers keep assuming this statement is saying the conclusion of the investigation it's not at all. Talk to any lawyer you know they will clear it up doe you. The heat is still on.

 

He so wants to believe the Russian trolls so he can have an excuse why he was so humiliated predicting Hillary's landslide. The Russians see humiliated leftist as easy targets and fuel their dilutions to divide our country.

 

Do you know what the word "unwitting" means?

 

The other Russian trolls are pushing the lie that Mueller is going to get Trump for money laundering now. They just keep feeding the delusional minds of our leftist friends and our leftist friends "unwittingly" do Putin's bidding.

 

It's really beyond hopeless. You can't control what's posted on the web, any more than you can control how people react to what's posted. At best you succeed in giving Putin "internet censorship", and "thought police" internet memes, right ahead of 2018 mid-terms. It's a foreign policy nightmare. Kim Jung Un, Xi Ping, and Rouhanis oppressive regimes flourish under censorship, and we criticise, actually condemn it every day. Dems have lost their collective senses.

 

They don't state that forcefully, or at all.

According to R Rosenstein: “There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”

That is a long, long way from a conclusion that the Russians had no impact on the election results. The absence of a positive allegation in this indictment is not the same as a determination of the negative.

This indictment also does not allege that the Democrats colluded with Russians. Do you think that means that the indictments state forcefully that it didn't happen?

Your post is a non sequitur.

But, on the positive side, at least you are living up to your screen name.