Discussion in 'United States' started by chris155au, Apr 25, 2019.
So the dems want it for the taxpayer?
I want it for me. Are you afraid of it?
that is not full access, and if they read it, they can not repeat it as it' classified.... they need their staff to comb through it with a fine tooth come
and of course the public should also have access like they did with Clinton
fact is, once Trump is out of office in 2020, dems will release it... the public will see it
Isn't that the definition of "making **** up" ...
or is it the definition of "Seriously super secret if I told you I had to kill you and your entire family"
Hope Hicks and someone else on the plane with Trump.
You should download the report and read it. Some of them are searchable - then you can just plug in Hope hicks and see her testimony.
Did you forget that you already responded to this?
What are you talking about? What are you saying is "searchable?"
What did the public have "access" to with Clinton?
Do you really think that there will be anything 'bombshell' about the few redacted lines?
Not at all. It doesn't bother me in the slightest if Trump gets a life sentence!
You're going to read through millions of pages?
I thought you forgot you already ask the question.
Are you in a loop now?
I'm sure it is very well organized. I might search, for example, for Hope Hicks testimony.
I'm sure those investigating Trump would like to read McGahn's exact words. Fun reading. You should try it with Mueller's report.
What are you saying is "searchable?"
Didn't you say that YOU want to see the evidence?
the star report
I do. But I'm not the only one.
But did you notice they are releasing some of it?
So again, you're going to read through millions of pages? To confirm, you want ALL of the evidence released to the public?
What are you referring to?
I guess you missed this. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ws-some-things.554756/page-12#post-1070596108
No, I don't need the secret stuff.
Some intelligence reports are being released to the House.
Mueller report: It doesn't tell us how it knows some things.
That's because it's been redacted.
Search on what?
I received a reply alert to this. What happened? Didn't you think your reply was good enough?
You mean releasing the unredacted report for Democrats to view if they wish? And giving certain members copies of their own? Yeah I knew about that. If there was anything 'bombshell' in it we would know, right?
When did I ask it a second time?
Separate names with a comma.