Johnson isn't a bad guy, I liked him. I didn't vote for Trump myself, nor do I support his tweeting, but the more the left attacked him with baseless claims, the more I liked the way he called them out on their behavior. I think it's ashame they are such babies, because rarely would they have had a chance to have a President open to some of their ideas. But their sore losing got in the way.
he was looking into Russia trying to hack our election, and also if Trump had any involvement, he found Trump attempted to collude with Russia but was a failure at it and got nothing, like a failed bank robber.... then Trump obstructed the investigations into it... again... attempted, but failed, even though he fired Comey, Mueller just took over not being a good criminal doesn't mean what you did was not wrong
Because he wasn't driven by politics like Ken Starr. And if you bother to read his repirt you will find his reasons why he could not find enough evidence to conclude that criminal conspiracy occurred. You will also note that he didn't say it didn't occur. Things like key witnesses being overseas and others lying or not furnishing information or rather conclusvly Trump's failure to meet with Mueller and Trump's thirty plus I don't recall answers to the written questions.
hahaha i get that he didn't say crimes were committed that's my point. He doesn't have to say it "didn't occur" he only needs to provide the fact he didn't have enough evidence to support prosecution....hence why Trump remains innocent....Trump didn't have to meet with Mueller...that's not how it works here, a request was made to answer written questions, he did. You obviously didn't read the report, Mueller goes to great lengh descrbiing the massive resources, and depth of this investigation: 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, intelligent analysts, forensic accountants, more then 2800 subponeas, nearly 500 search warrants, more then 230 orders of communications records, 13 request to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed 500 witnesses.....now not only won't you accept the report, you are saying he didn't do his job! hahahah
false, Muller was not allowed to indict Trump, only Congress can review the facts from the Mueller report and decide what actions to take against Trump's bad behavior
they have not got the full Mueller report yet, they are in no hurry if Trump wants to slowly pull off the band-aid, dems will let him dems want to impeach him, but want the Senate to fight it, that way they can go to the voters in an election year and say, we tried, it's up to you... get out and vote this pig out of office
Yes, the precedent set by Clinton with Chinagate, Bill had learned from his perjury over Paula Jones.
The copy with fewer redactions that Barr just made available has only 4 remaining redactions. No reports any (D) has or will go look at that new unredacted copy. Why bother, if your going to contradict it and investigate without cause anyway right?
once again, who said anything about indicting him? Starr didn't indict Clinton, and the lawyers involved with Watergate didn't indict Nixon...however they recommended them, first however impeachment has to happen. Here, you have none of that....because they couldn't establish a high crime or misdemeanor took place. Please actually read the Report...it's laid out there clearly
we will see, and Mueller has yet to appear before congress, much to occur before an indictment, prob happen around march 2020
We've seen. All 4 (D) committee chairman refused to go look at the unredacted report. Mueller is expected to appear by May 23. (D)'s aren't questioning the delay either. Jackasses are braying that Mueller would have indicted Trump if he weren't POTUS. Mueller has only 1 question to answer then doesn't he? I assume Mueller has a telephone. The answer doesn't need to given under oath. Enjoy your delusions, but don't expect many sane people to share them with you.
they want the report sent to them, Congress has a right to this report, that said, we have much to do yet, like interviewing Mueller, ect... many investigations still on-going I want everyone under oath, including Trump, the liar in cheif
I'm assuming they're willing to read Mueller's report. Of course, many of those who don't care what the report says won't bother to read it.
